Connect with us

Culture

ABC Attacks Judge Candidate Over Twitter Jokes

Published

on

One of the major propaganda arms of the DNC is intent on taking down a potential nominee for the soon-to-be vacated Supreme Court seat over dad jokes made on Twitter.

“Legal scholars say there’s no legal provision prohibiting Supreme Court justices from sharing their opinions online or in speeches,” wrote ABC’s Adia Robinson. “The Supreme Court has maintained that the strict code of conduct that applies to lower court judges does not apply to them, but that doesn’t mean that the legal community looks favorably on justices making public comments.”

What controversial opinions was she referring to? United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Don Willett’s musings on Twitter, of course.

Trending: BETRAYED: How Parler Sold Out to the Globalist Establishment to Get Back Online

“When you’re tired of cornbread shaped like Colorado and Wyoming,” Willett tweeted in December, attaching a picture of cornbread shaped like Texas.

Apparently, ABC thinks that a photo of cornbread shaped like Texas should disqualify a candidate from the Supreme Court. But Willett’s offenses do not stop there. Willett once rick-rolled his followers – a capitol offense for potential Supreme Court Justices.

He even made a dad joke about puppies:

This is the perfect reminder of the absurdity of the destroy-Trump media. ABC and Adia Robinson are trying to impugn wrongdoing on a potential Supreme Court nominee, not because he actually did anything wrong, but because he could be nominated by Trump.

In reality, Willett has a goofy personality. He might even be a likable person – a foreign concept to Democrats.

Free Speech

Trump Preparing Case Before “Facebook Supreme Court” to Restore Platform Access

Why not just get on Gab?

Published

on

President Donald Trump is slated to present an argument before a self-appointed ‘Facebook Supreme Court’ of sorts, seeking reinstatement to his page on the platform after being indefinitely suspended following the raucous January 6th US Capitol riot.

The Facebook Oversight board is almost exclusively composed of left-wing neoliberals, many of whom are affiliated with global tech corporations and leftist oligarch George Soros. It’s highly unlikely that the board is going to allow Trump to restore his presence on Facebook, raising questions as to the merit of the appeal.

The judges on the platform are employed by Facebook itself, serving as a de facto kangaroo court to justify the platform’s censorship decisions. The case regarding Trump’s account is the first time the court has been utilized to judge a case of censorship.

When Trump was suspended from Facebook on January 7th, Mark Zuckerberg had claimed “the risks of allowing the president to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” revealing he’d be suspended until the end of his presidency at the very earliest. Twitter has confirmed that Trump’s suspension from the platform is permanent.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The approach of asking left-wing oligarchs permission to use their poorly administrated, invasive and censorious platforms has proven to be a waste of time and a dead horse for the America First movement. Instead of asking to get back on Facebook, President Trump should take custody of the large Gab account already reserved for him, and invite his tens of millions of followers to join the free speech platform.


Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending