Connect with us

Politics

Al Franken Accused by 9th Woman of Sexual Assault: He Put a ‘Little Squeeze on my Buttock’

Franken is hoping to rehabilitate his political career despite being accused of many improprieties.

Published

on

Disgraced former Sen. Al Franken from Minnesota is hoping to rehabilitate his political career after he was forced to resign in disgrace in late 2017 following multiple allegations of sexual impropriety, another casualty of the #MeToo movement.

However, his comeback is going to be a bit more difficult to pull off after a ninth woman has emerged to accuse him of inappropriate behavior.

The alleged victim, who has chosen to remain anonymous and now works at a progressive political organization, claimed she was groped by Franken in 2006 when she worked for Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) after graduating from college.

Trending: Twitter Censors Audio of Detroit Poll Workers Being Trained to Lie to Voters, Destroy Ballots, Stop Challengers

“He’s telling the photographer, ‘Take another one. I think I blinked. Take another one.’ And I’m just frozen. It’s so violating. And then he gives me a little squeeze on my buttock, and I am bright red. I don’t say anything at the time, but I felt deeply, deeply uncomfortable,” the woman told The Cut.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two years ago, I would have sworn that I’d never done anything to make anyone feel uncomfortable, but it’s clear that I must have been doing something. As I’ve said before, I feel terrible that anyone came away from an interaction with me feeling bad,” Franken said to The Cut, in a non-apology of sorts.

These allegations come at a particularly bad time for Franken, right as the liberal fake news was beginning to rehabilitate the man.

HuffPo published an article about Franken’s “career comeback” just last week after it was announced he was being given a radio show on Sirius/XM and would be covering the 2020 presidential election:

Franken will host a weekly radio show premiering Saturday on SiriusXM, the network announced Wednesday, with guests including actor and comedian Chris Rock, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and actor and comedian Patton Oswalt.

He will also contribute to SiriusXM’s coverage of the 2020 presidential election, the network said in its press release.

The announcement calls Franken “an important and influential progressive voice, whom many have missed.” It makes no direct mention of the allegations, which included him groping and forcibly kissing women, allegedly telling one of them it was “my right as an entertainer” to kiss her without consent.

Franken’s return to the spotlight continues a pattern of accused or admitted sexual predators getting career comebacks, an opportunity almost never afforded to their accusers.

In recent months, he appeared to have been gearing up for his return, gradually making more public appearances and rallying his supporters through an email list, website and podcast.

Last summer, he told a local news station in Minnesota that he has not ruled out the possibility of running for office again. In July, he told The New Yorker he “absolutely” regrets resigning, questioning some of the claims.

In lieu of his latest accusation, Franken’s return to the political scene may be in jeopardy as the former “Saturday Night Live” writer continues to rack up assault claims.

Campaign 2020

USC Experimental Model Polling Calculation Forecasts Donald Trump Election Victory

They’re accounting for what they call social desirability bias.

Published

on

A polling method utilized by the University of Southern California’s Dornslife College is predicting that President Donald Trump will secure an electoral college victory, deviating from many polling models produced by corporate media in accounting for what they call a “social desirability bias.”

USC’s polling model seeks to account for what they’re citing as shy Trump supporters by asking poll respondents how they believe that those in their own immediatel social circles will vote. The theorists behind the poll argue that such a line of questioning allows respondents more inclined to disclose information to reveal how so-called shy Trump supporters will vote.

“To evaluate the potential impact of the shy voter belief on the responses of poll participants, we asked them three questions: What percent of their social contacts might be embarrassed to admit to pollsters their opinions about Trump or Biden, what percent might fear harassment if they admit these opinions, and what percent might want to obstruct polls by misreporting who they will vote for?

On average, our participants believe that people in their social circle might be more reluctant to admit their support for Trump than for Biden.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

When the presence of socially identified shy Trump voters is accounted for, the USC pollsters ultimately make a cautious prediction that Biden will fail to secure 270 electoral college votes.

When we calculate how many electoral votes each candidate could get based on state level averages of the own-intention and social-circle questions, it’s looking like an Electoral College loss for Biden.

Read the entire USC/Dornslife prediction of the 2020 election, how they account for shy Trump supporters, and what they’re defining as social desirability bias here.

Jim Key of USC points to previous correct predictions of the USC/Dornslife polling model in support of the method’s veracity. He argues that the polling organization correctly predicted the outcomes ofthe  2016 U.S. Presidential election, the 2017 French Presidential election, the 2017 Dutch Parliamentary election, the 2018 Swedish Parliamentary election, and the 2018 U.S. election for the House of Representatives.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending