Swedish Member of Parliament Linda Snecker has been called out for her recent statement where she declared that women “assume that all men are rapists.”
Then she said that “the violence of men must be stopped” and urged that men take “collective responsibility” for perpetuating rape.
In a speech about the rising degree of violent crime in Sweden, Snecker said “Men’s violence against women governs the entire world structure.”
The member of the Left Party then capped her speech off with, “That is why the struggle of feminism is everyone’s struggle. The violence of men must be stopped.”
A report from Sputnik revealed Snecker’s belief that “sexual oppression cut through all layers of society, with the culprits being men of all possible backgrounds and positions.”
Snecker’s statement received considerable pushback from Sweden Democrat Party member Katja Nyberg who said “Linda Snecker assumes that all men are rapists and says that all men must take their responsibility.”
Nyberg, however, thinks there’s more to Snecker’s antics than meets the eye. She said, “It is a smoke screen to cover up the real causes of the sex crime epidemic.”
She continued, “They desperately deny the consequences of their own mass immigration policy and instead blame all men, only to hide the facts of rape.” In this case, Nyberg alludes to migration policies that have created no-go zones and have turned Stockholm into the rape capital of Europe.
According to the Swedish Crime Prevention Council, 2018 was a record year with 7,556 reported rapes. Official statistics don’t include ethnic background, however certain independent reports point to immigrants dominating these statistics. Indeed, this raises concern because immigrants make up a quarter of Sweden’s population.
Sweden is not the only country subject to this trend. BLP reported how Germany is now witnessing the rise of no-go zones as a result of mass migration policies that Chancellor Angela Merkel has pursued in recent years.
These policies are generating backlash. BLP revealed that leaders like Matteo Salvini and Nigel Farage have become some of the most influential populists in European politics thanks to their hardline stances against mass migration. As a result, their parties are expected to perform well in the upcoming European elections.
Globalist advocates of mass migration will definitely have their hands full in the May elections.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Did Bernie Sanders Just Endorse a Neocon Regime Change Foreign Policy?
Is Bernie Sanders the anti-war candidate that many non-interventionists are making him out to be?
Journalists Jacob Crosse and Barry Grey presented some interesting observations about Sanders’ foreign policy views.
Sanders criticized the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani in January and also stressed his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
During the Iowa presidential debate, Sanders loudly boasted, “I not only voted against that war, I helped lead the effort against that war.”
However, Sanders changed his tune when chatting with the New York Times.
The answers the Sanders campaign gave the Times showed its flexibility when it comes to foreign policy.
In other words, the Sanders campaign signaled to the military and intelligence apparatus that Sanders won’t present a threat to their interests and may actually carry out their interventionist agenda.
One question in the survey that the Times sent the Sanders campaign stuck out above the rest.
The third survey question asked, “Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?”
The Sanders campaign responded, “Yes.”
Based on this response, Sanders’ is signaling that he’s willing to continue Bush-era policies of “preemptive war.”
Like Obama, Sanders’ opposition to the Iraq War was a matter of politics rather than a principled opposition to regime change wars.
His campaign was also asked, “Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?”
Sanders responded, “Yes.”
Some of the wars that the U.S. carried out in the name of “human rights” have been the Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia in the 1990s along with the aerial campaign against Libya in 2011 and the Civil War launched in Syria.
All in all, Sanders’ pro-peace/non-interventionist image is at best window dressing.
Under a Sanders presidency, the interventionist status quo will likely stay in place.
News3 days ago
Bernie Sanders 2020 ‘Win’ in NH Netted a LOSS OF 80,000 VOTES from 2016
News3 days ago
Virginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
Violent Left2 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
Tech3 days ago
More Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
Violent Left3 days ago
New Hampshire Thug Arrested After Assaulting ‘MAGA’ Hat-Wearing 15-Year Old at Polling Site
Deep State3 days ago
Bill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
Violent Left4 days ago
Wife of ‘Proud Boys’ Member Imprisoned for Self-Defense Pleads for Help for Their Three Children
News2 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
Culture2 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
The Swamp2 days ago
SWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
News3 days ago
GUILTY: Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Convicted in Extortion Trial
Politics3 days ago
MIT Warns That Voting App Used in Several States is Vulnerable for Hackers to ‘Alter, Stop or Expose’ Votes