Connect with us

Tech

Amazon Hiring Private Intelligence to Target Enemies Like Political Dissidents and Labor Leaders

This is scary.

Published

on

The private corporation Amazon is hiring intelligence goons to target their enemies like political dissidents and labor leaders.

Amazon removed the job posting from their website after anger began to build about the tech monopoly’s brazen maneuver to target its enemies with its immense power and wealth.

The job posting requested analysts who could focus on “sensitive topics that are highly confidential, including labor organizing threats against the company,” and “establish and track funding and activities connected to corporate campaigns (internal and external) against Amazon.”

Trending: #StopTheTires – American Truckers Halt Shipments Citing Voter Fraud, Elite Disrespect, Joe Biden

They said that the work would be used to formulate “restraining orders against activist groups.” Amazon made their intention clear for their opponents to be jailed, saying that “intelligence assessments are used by Legal to demonstrate to court of law that activist groups harbor intent for continued illegal activity” with regards to the company.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The original job posting can be seen here:

The groups on Amazon’s hit list seemingly include “hate groups, policy initiatives, geopolitical issues, terrorism, law enforcement, and organized labor.” They are looking for “previous experience in intelligence analysis and or watch officer skill set in the intelligence community, the military, law enforcement, or a related global security role in the private sector.”

Big League Politics reported on how Amazon founder Jeff Bezos rubbed elbows with dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell long after it was widely understood that she played a major role in Epstein’s illicit operation:

Amazon founder and Washington Post kingpin Jeff Bezos is one of the most influential globalist oligarchs in the world, and he invited Ghislaine Maxwell to a meeting of his secret society for influential writers last year.

VICE has discovered that Maxwell, who has been fingered in civil court documents as the long-time accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, was invited by Bezos to his Campfire meeting in 2018. She has been called out by many of Epstein’s alleged victims as the fiend who helped the late Democrat-affiliated predator groom underage girls for his sex trafficking operation.

Bezos holds his annual Campfire, a gala meeting where he invites Hollywood celebrities, tech moguls, top authors, and other influential figures to mingle under the cover of darkness. Two different attendees confirmed off the record that Maxwell appeared at the 2018 event. She did not appear at the 2019 event that convened last month, following Epstein’s mysterious death that was ruled a suicide by the authorities…

Bezos, whose messy public feud with President Donald Trump has become headline news in recent years, sees himself as the new master of reality. He very well may be allying himself with some of the world’s seediest actors in service of Moloch toward the ends of a satanic one-world government.

Amazon is one of many Big Tech monopolies that needs to be broken up immediately to stop the Orwellian Nightmare from coming to fruition.

Tech

Twitter Suspends Election Whistleblower After Giving Riveting Testimony in Arizona about Mathematical Fraud

This isn’t the first time.

Published

on

Throughout the day in Arizona, many credible whistleblowers have stepped forward to give testimony about the multitude of irregularities that occurred during the election.

One expert witness, Bobby Fiton, attested to mathematical fraud during the election that casts serious doubt on the vote totals as they are currently reported. He made a particularly powerful statement with regards to Gov. Doug Ducey, who certified the dubious vote while whistleblowers were going on the record.

“If I was an executive at a publicly-traded company, I would never sign that because I risk jailtime and having all my money taken from me in lawsuits,” he said.

“I would have never, ever certified. I would have rather resigned than certify those results… I believe they’re fraudulent based on the data,” Fiton continued.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“And my sister asked me a simple question this morning, she goes: ‘How sure are you?’ And my sister’s a pretty stubborn person like me, and I said: ‘I’d be willing to put my life on it.’ I’m that sure about the analysis assuming that the data that I got from the state and everything else was accurate,” he added.

A clip of Fiton’s testimony can be seen here:

Immediately after he issued his testimony, Fiton was banned on Twitter to prevent his analysis from being widely understood by the masses:

Twitter had previously done this to the personal account of state senator Doug Mastriano to stop his anti-fraud efforts from gaining momentum immediately after similar hearings were held in Pennsylvania last week.

“We move heaven and earth with American dollars to secure elections in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere. We can’t do it in our own state?” Mastriano said at the hearing. “There’s people in Pennsylvania not interested in safe, secure elections.”

Big League Politics has reported on Twitter’s assault on conservatives, which includes a recent hire of an extreme far-left activist as head of conversational safety:

The media company Protocol, a sister site of Politico, recently published an article about Twitter’s new “head of product for conversational safety,” Christine Su. It claims that Su, a “young, queer Asian-American businesswoman,” is revolutionizing what “user safety” on social media means.

Twitter hired Su around six months ago to be in charge of “what might be the most difficult task on Twitter,” despite having no apparent experience in politics, programming, and media relations. But Twitter seems to like her for her “creative” and “somewhat radical new ideas” about user safety.

“As a queer woman of color who is an Asian American in tech in rural America, that experience is a very intersectional one. I’ve had plenty of experiences moving through spaces where I wanted more safety,” Su said.

Protocol writes that Su’s vision incorporates “transformative and procedural justice.” Transformative justice ostensibly refers to a non-retributive form of repairing harm done to someone and preventing it from happening again; procedural justice to enacting a set of rules that “make harm rarer in the first place.”

This all sounds nice and dandy—but beware. So-called transformative and procedural justice will not benefit you, but will crush you. Anything that’s perceived as “harmful” against “women and people from marginalized groups” can and will be used to censor you. Christine Su may reassuringly claim that “the point is not to make the entire world a safe space,” but she’s open about the fact that she will help give the Coalition of the Fringes more control over what people are allowed to do and say on Twitter.

Big Tech has emerged as an existential threat to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. If they succeed in validating Biden’s electoral fraud, it will mean an end to America and a death sentence for Western Civilization.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending