Connect with us

Fake News Media

Before Andy Ngo Was Brutally Assaulted by ANTIFA, Mainstream Media Promoted ‘Milkshaking’ Extensively

The fake news has spent weeks promoting “milkshaking” as a hip new protest against right-wing bad guys.

Published

on

Journalist Andy Ngo of Quillette was viciously assaulted by a gang of left-wing ANTIFA terrorists in Portland, OR on Saturday.

One of their weapons of choice was reportedly a milkshake filled with quick-drying cement. Ngo was forced to go to the emergency room as the result of the attacks.

Trending: Snopes Covers for Bill Gates’ Wife for Wearing Satanic Inverted Cross During Media Appearance

Before this violent incident, the mainstream media had promoted the act of “milkshaking” as a trendy form of protest against right-wing individuals for weeks. This form of political violence initially gained popularity in the United Kingdom, where Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage along with political figures Tommy Robinson and Sargon of Akkad were targeted by the violent attacks in the lead up to last month’s European parliamentary elections.

The mainstream media was thrilled to cheer on this practice at the time.

“There should be no debate over the importance of eradicating fascism, and of confronting its agents when they poke their ugly heads out into the commons. That the latest means of doing so involves both the public humiliation of racists and one of nature’s most delicious frosty treats is pure poetry in motion,” wrote Kim Kelly for VICE.

“The milkshake knows no triangulation. It has no truck with ‘legitimate concerns.’ It reminds everyone that these grotesques aren’t ‘normal’; that they are purveyors of hate and guzzlers of largesse from the transnational rich,” wrote Aditya Chakrabortty in The Guardian.

“Getting doused in a milkshake robs far-right figures of the air of chauvinistic invulnerability that they spend so much time cultivating,” Matt Ford wrote in his article, “Why Milkshaking Works” published by The New Republic.

“The target of said milkshake attack, which conservatives are already bemoaning as a sign of the end of civilization, was Rep. Matt Gaetz, who was pelted with a shake in his Florida district on Saturday, according to WKRG. Don’t worry, there’s video,” wrote Sophie Weiner for Splinter News, celebrating the first time a milkshake was thrown toward a right-wing politician in the U.S.

CBS This Morning co-host Tony Dokoupil laughed about the incidents: “In the latest of a series of attacks on right-wing politicians, Brexit Party Leader Nigel Farage was doused with a milkshake yesterday. That was actually salted caramel if anyone is wondering.”

“I’m sure it feels great. I’m sure people love the feeling. Pictures fly around the world,” he added.

Pro-censorship Vox blogger and LGBT activist Carlos Maza issued a ringing endorsement for milkshaking as well:

Some journalists are even apologizing for the violence that Ngo endured at the hands of the ANTIFA domestic terrorists.

Quillete published an article demonstrating the ties between ANTIFA domestic terrorists and mainstream media journalists in May. The ties couldn’t be more obvious in the aftermath of the vicious left-wing assault against Ngo.

Fake News Media

VILE: New York Times Claims U.S. Military ‘Celebrates White Supremacy’ on Memorial Day

The fake news hates America.

Published

on

To commemorate Memorial Day, the New York Times published an op/ed claiming that the U.S. military celebrates white supremacy.

The op/ed was signed by the entire editorial board of the Times, showing how this view is ubiquitous among everyone on the fake news rag. They argue that the U.S. military celebrates white supremacy because they have not sufficiently pissed on the graves of ancestors deemed to be racist by Cultural Marxists.

The editorial board claims that “innocent intentions cannot obscure the truth that secessionists embarked on the Civil War to guarantee the rights of some human beings to own others, or the fact that the Confederate banner represents the same white supremacist values as — and is often displayed in tandem with — the Nazi swastika.”

They are pushing for the U.S. military to rename their bases that are named after Confederate generals, as the leftists march to degrade American culture in their relentless push to transform the nation.

take our poll - story continues below

LOCKDOWN POLL: Should America reopen for business?

  • 🔒LOCKDOWN POLL🔒 Should America reopen for business? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“This same toxic legacy clings to the 10 United States military installations across the South that were named for Confederate Army officers during the first half of the 20th century,” the Times editorial board wrote.

“Apologists often describe the names as a necessary gesture of reconciliation in the wake of the Civil War. In truth, the namings reflect a federal embrace of white supremacy that found its most poisonous expression in military installations where black servicemen were deliberately placed under the command of white Southerners — who were said to better “understand” Negroes — and confined to substandard housing, segregated transportation systems and even “colored only” seating in movie houses,” they added.

The cultural genocide is not just extended to Confederate ancestors, but also to the Founding Fathers as well. The Times has pushed revisionist anti-American history through the 1619 Project, which has stated blatantly false claims about America seceding from the British to protect the institute of slavery.

Big League Politics has reported about how the Left is coming after all symbols honoring American heritage and the founding-era revolutionaries who put their lives on the line to establish liberty:

After a San Francisco school board voted to paint over a mural depicting the life of George Washington, over 500 academics signed an open letter urging the board to reverse course.

This decision was made after accusations of the mural traumatizing students and glorifying “slavery, genocide, colonization, manifest destiny, white supremacy, oppression.” USA Today reported that hundreds of educators are protesting this decision, calling it a “gross violation of logic” as the mural actually represents “a significant monument of anti-racism.”

The mural was created by Russian-American painter Victor Arnautoff in 1936, according to a report from the Richmond District Blog. Some of the mural’s images were attacked during the civil rights movement over its portrayal of slavery and Native Americans…

Rachael Z. DeLue, an Art History and American Studies professor at Princeton University, told USA Today that the mural shouldn’t be removed:

“If we cover it up and we whitewash it, not only are we doing a disservice to history, but we’re also doing a disservice to those who suffered at the hands of European-descended Americans: slaves and Native Americans who were traumatized and killed.”

DeLue added, “It’s also the case that this isn’t simply of the past. The legacies of slavery and federal policy about Native Americans live on in the present.”

Paul Von Blum, a senior lecturer in African American studies and communications studies at University of California, Los Angeles, suggested that students become more mentally tough.

“I know it causes students to cringe, but that’s the function of art,” Von Blum said to USA Today. “And art should never be censored.”

The New York Times openly hates America and wants the nation to be destroyed and its people to be subjugated. The fake news is the enemy of the people.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending