Before the Election, DHS Set Up ‘Sector Coordinating Council’ with Dominion and Smartmatic Reps to Oversee the Vote
Shane Trejo
|
After the election, many so-called national experts have proclaimed that the 2020 vote was the most secure in history as they plot desperately to avoid legitimate inquiry.
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” the members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee said in a statement.
“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections,” they added.
However, it has been revealed that Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) literally partnered with executives from Dominion and Smartmatic to form the Elections Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) to “protect” electoral infrastructure prior to the dubious vote.
“The Sector Coordinating Council would like to assure the public that the SCC is working collectively to cooperate, share and exchange information with DHS and the nation’s intelligence community to ensure the integrity and security of our nation’s critical voting infrastructure,” the SCC executive committee stated prior to the election.
The SCC executive committee members included Chairman Chris Wlaschin of Election Systems & Software, Vice Chair Bryan Finney of Democracy Live, Kay Stimson of Dominion Voting Systems, Ericka Haas of the Electronic Registration Information Center, and Edwin Smith of Smartmatic. They operate in a dual capacity with the GCC, which were both mandated into existence in Jan. 2017 by DHS before President Trump could even be sworn into office.
Big League Politics reported on a survey of tech professionals indicating that a strong majority of them had major concerns about electoral integrity shortly before the vote took place:
The Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA) released the findings of a survey months before the election of the opinions of tech professionals, showing that a majority of them had deep concerns with electoral integrity heading into November’s election. The fake news media, of course, swept this crucial survey under the rug.
The professionals who were surveyed in September listed the rankings of their concerns as follows:
“1. Misinformation/disinformation campaigns (73%)
2. Tampering with tabulation of voter results (64%)
3. Hacking or tampering with voter registration rolls
Hacking or tampering with voting machines (both 62%)”
Retired Brigadier General and ISACA board director Greg Touhill was alarmed at the findings, hoping to throw cold water on the legitimate concerns of the tech professionals with regards to the voting process.
“The overwhelming majority of localities have sound election security procedures in place, but the public’s perception does not match the reality,” said Touhill.
“This means that governments, from the county level on up, need to clearly and robustly communicate about what they are doing to secure their election infrastructure. As the study indicates, the most real threat to the election—impacting all candidates from all parties—is misinformation and disinformation campaigns,” he added.
Tech professionals suggested the following remedies to allay election concerns:
“1. Educating the electorate about misinformation (65%)
2. Using electronic voting machines with paper audit trails (64%)
3. Increased training for election and election security personnel (62%)”
Unfortunately, none of those recommendations were ever put into place, and America had to deal with third-world nightmare on election day.
Even though the process has been rife with fraud and abnormalities, China-owned politicians and bureaucrats have championed the process anyway as they hope the dubious media-ordained outcome can be finalized as quickly as possible.
These so-called experts are desperate to gloss over the incredible fraud that happened during this year’s vote. They will seemingly make up any lie to avoid being held liable for their seditious actions.
Share:
