Connect with us

News

Ben Sasse Gets Roasted By Pro-Lifer for His Weak Leadership

Published

on

Pro-life advocate Hadley Arkes Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act is disappointed with Ben Sasse’s spineless leadership.

Arkes is the mastermind of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, legislation that protects babies who survive abortion.

In Arkes’s view, Sasse and other establishment Republicans failed to follow through with his original plan and punish Democrats for their pro-abortion efforts.

Trending: Leftist Thug Targets Roger Stone’s Handicapped Wife for Vicious Attack in Own Neighborhood

Arkes expanded:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“That has been my complaint about Ben Sasse, is he didn’t stick with it. Timidity or want of imagination is why … people [have] been so slow with picking up the fact that this kind of thing really resonates with the public.”

Sasse introduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act earlier this year and Senate Democrats stopped it in its tracks last month.

Arkes said the legislation should have included a preamble that he originally drafted. In Arkes’s view, this legislation would function as a vehicle for Congress to assert its power over the issue of abortion. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would be the first step, as Congress would gradually assert its right to regulate all forms of abortion.

According to Arkes, he had lobbied the senator to have his preamble language added on to the bill, but they did not want to derail Sasse’s version of the bill, which left it out.

Arkes drew up the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act in 1988 and it gradually made its way into Congress. It finally became law in 2002, but it did not have much teeth as far as penalties were concerned.

According to Princeton professor Robert George, who is a friend of Arkes, the 2002 bill was a compromise that threw a bone at pro-lifers and provided cover for moderate Democrats who wanted to avoid being seen as being pro-infanticide while avoiding attacks from pro-abortion groups like Planned Parenthood and NARAL.

There has been little traction to pass penalties since the 2002 version of this bill was passed.

However, a tougher Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act has gained a resurgence ever since Virginia Governor Ralph Northam endorsed the ideas of allowing abortions up to the point of birth or not protecting infants born alive. Sadly, this bill died on a 53-44 vote.

Arkes still wants Republicans to use his legislation to attack Democrats and keep the issue alive.

Sasse, who’s a seasoned defender of legacy institutions like the military-industrial complex and a favorite son of legacy institutions, is no threat to the political establishment. For these reasons, pro-lifers would be wise to not put meaningful pro-life legislation in Sasse’s hands.

All too often, establishment Republicans water down their bills or make half-hearted efforts to pass meaningful legislation. However, their efforts are always lauded by naive political gatekeepers and make for good fundraising material.

This is how the DC swamp and its access-based lobby appendages operate.

Pro-lifers should look for another champion in the Senate. Ben Sasse simply doesn’t cut it.

 

News

Marjorie Taylor Greene Plans to Introduce Articles of Impeachment Against President Biden ON DAY ONE

She’s citing Biden family corruption.

Published

on

Georgia freshman Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene is planning on introducing articles of impeachment against President Joe Biden the day after he’s inaugurated.

Greene made the announcement on Wednesday.

Greene is citing Biden family corruption, accusing Biden of standing by as his own relatives enriched themselves through business deals with foreign oligarchs, using the former Vice President’s family name.

Biden game-planned on messaging to dismiss his son Hunter’s involvement with corrupt Ukrainian oil company Burisma, receiving advice from the State Department while accusing the company’s oligarch owner of criminal activity. It didn’t occur to Biden to address the fact that his own son secured highly lucrative employment with Burisma until the topic became a point of political contention in the 2020 election.

MEMO: Biden Was Briefed on Burisma’s Corruption Weeks Before Demanding Ukrainian Prosecutor’s Firing

Biden’s brother, Jim Biden, has also been accused of securing lucrative business deals in China under the auspices of the Biden family name. Biden has steadfastly refused to speak in detail about suspicious Biden family business dealings, even though he’s gone so far as to openly brag about securing the termination of a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma for laundering profits of the former state-owned enterprise.

Greene is demanding that Biden be held accountable for the de facto licensure of his family name in Ukraine, an international liability that far surpasses anything proven to be real through a lengthy investigation into Donald Trump’s supposed connections of Russia.

The articles of impeachment are doomed from the get-go, with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi assured to protect Biden from allegations of corruption and poor governance. However, the Democratic Party has been unable to resist turning the presidential impeachment process into a wholly partisan, reactionary affair, and may reap the whirlwinds of their decision if Republicans willing to hold the establishment politician accountable gain majorities in the House and the Senate.


Follow me on Twitter @Wildman_AZ, on Parler @Moorhead, and on Gab @WildmanAZ.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending