Biden SCOTUS Nominee Explains Why Child Pornographers Deserve Lighter Sentences
Is clown world now in full swing? Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was recently nominated by White House occupant Joe Biden for the position of the Supreme Court of the United States, defended giving sentences for child pornographers that were significantly lower than the federal guidelines.
Why did she do that? One may ask.
According to Jackson, fully charging a child pornographer for their crimes would be too harsh during present times given their ability to store so much illicit material on a modern technology we call computers. In other words, the number of images an average defendant possessed would be too many. It seems that Jackson considers child pornography stored on a computer to be a lesser crime compared to that donned in say, a physical photograph or magazine.
Establishment cons say she is 'qualified' though so we are supposed to overlook her actual record
This is what credentialism leads to
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) March 22, 2022
The explosive allegations were previously publicly brought to light by Missouri Senator Josh Hawley in a hearing earlier this week. Numerous cases involving Judge Jackson were discussed, including one in which she gave a prolific child pornographer only 3 months in prison after federal guidelines recommended a minimum of 97 months.