Big League Politics and many of its reporters have now joined Parler, the pro-free speech social media website rumored to be part of President Donald Trump’s social media strategy for his 2020 reelection campaign.
Big League Politics is now on the popular pro-free speech platform, and is an official Parler Partner. While Facebook, Twitter, and Google actively attempt to hide our articles and reduce their reach, Parler and Big League Politics are working together to provide high quality, pro-America news to the public.
Perhaps Parler’s most fascinating and distinguishing difference from the other big tech giants is its devotion to freedom of speech. While Facebook, Twitter, Google, and virtually every other big tech website offer byzantine rules regarding what they consider hate speech, sensitive content, targeted harassment, and other forms of behavior they consider toxic, Parler stands behind the United States Constitution’s definition of free speech.
Parler’s Community Guidelines, a five page long, easily read and understood document available on its website, enshrines this:
Parler desires to stand behind the definition of free speech as laid out in the United States Constitution in order to firmly and clearly state the type of communication that is allowed and that is prohibited within our platform. All users have full control over their account(s) to create and sustain conversations within accepted legal boundaries. Free speech allows users to express them-selves on their own profile and spread their message to their followers but it also allows users to avoid speech they do not want to see by blocking/banning or muting content they do not want tosee. This authority grants users the ability to publish content on their account, manage all direct interactions with other users and potentially filter material of others as they see fit. User have total control over the publishing, moderation and censorship of their accounts on the Parler platform. This establishes Parler as a neutral party whose responsibility is to uphold the law as defined by the United States Constitution, United States Supreme Court and the FCC consumer guidelines on obscenity, indecent and profane broadcasts.
In short, if you can legally make a statement in the United States, you can make the same statement on Parler. This, naturally, does not include threats, promises or incitements to commit violence, blackmail, slander, or other forms of legitimately illegal speech. However, there are no rules against or definitions of hate speech, fake news, or other terms used by the other big tech giants.
Even more exciting are the rumors of President Trump joining the pro-free speech platform as part of his 2020 reelection campaign’s social media strategy.
Amid censorship of conservative media by tech giants, a Tuesday POLITICO report said that President Donald J. Trump is considering opening an account on Parler, a Twitter-esque social network.
“According to one person close to Trump’s campaign, the president’s team is considering setting him up with an account on the site,” the report said. “A senior Trump campaign official said that there was no imminent plan to have the president join the platform, but that [Campaign Manager Brad] Parscale is scouting Parler.”
It is unclear what type of effect a Trump move would have on existing platforms that he uses, like Twitter. It is unlikely that Trump would stop using other forms of social media completely.
Many prominent, banned conservatives have found a new digital home on Parler amid the censorship crisis, that may be reaching its zenith as Project Veritas Action exposes Google for promising to never allow another “Trump situation” to occur.
After James O’Keefe’s earth shattering report, Google responded by banning and blacklisting many of the videos from its platforms, including YouTube.
Most of the Big League Politics staff of writers and reporters have now joined Parler, with the rest of the team planning to join soon:
Big League Politics – The official Parler account for our publication.
Patrick Howley – Big League Politics editor-in-chief’s new Parler account.
Peter D’Abrosca – Big League Politics senior reporter’s Parler account.
God Emperor Trump – The Parler account owned by this reporter, dedicated to a blend of conservative news and memes.
Luke Rohlfing – Big League Politics reporter’s Parler account.
Shane Trejo – Big League Politics reporter’s Parler account.
Jose Nino – Big League Politics reporter’s Parler account.
Richard Moorhead – Big League Politics reporter’s Parler account.
Some of our popular contributors are also on the free speech platform, including Laura Loomer, who was banned and branded a hate figure by virtually every other big tech platform over the last year.
While big tech frequently bans the mobile apps of free speech social media platforms and organizations, Parler currently has apps available on Google Play and the Apple App Store. The social media website brands itself as a mobile-first platform.
Thanks to Spineless, Establishment Republicans, Senate Panel Delays Vote to Subpoena Big Tech CEOs
Republicans Continue to Show Pathetic They are on the Issues that Matter Most
America First nationalist’s hopes of having Big Tech CEOs testify before Congress about allegations of censorship directed towards the Right were temporarily dashed on October 19, 2020.
Politico reported that the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed plans to vote on subpoenas to force the CEOs of Twitter and Facebook to go before the Senate and be questioned about their anti-Right wing censorship policies.
Some Republicans ended up having cold feet and decided to postpone the vote much to the disappointment of right wing activists who have complained about Big Tech’s anti-free speech policies.
President Donald Trump and a number of nationalist Republicans have sharply criticized Facebook and Twitter over their censorship of a controversial New York Post report that exposed Hunter Biden, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, and his corrupt behavior.
Originally, GOP officials in the Judiciary Committee announced plans to hold a markup on October 20 to determine if they would subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to get his perspective on allegations concerning his company’s policies that muzzle conservative viewpoints. Twitter denies claims regarding Twitter’s censorship policies.
South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who is the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, revealed that the planned vote would also call on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify.
The panel stated on October 19 that it would determine whether they would issue subpoenas during a executive session on October 22 where it will also allegedly approve Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. The committee declared in a statement that it will maintain negotiations with the companies “to allow for voluntary testimony” by the CEO. However, if an agreement cannot be reached, the panel will proceed to take a vote on the subpoenas “at a date to be determined.”
The subpoenas would compel the tech big wigs to testify on the reports of “suppression and/or censorship” of New York Post stories and on “any other content moderation policies, practices, or actions that may interfere with or influence elections for federal office,” according to a committee document released on October 19.
Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who is the chair of the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution said to reporters that he’s expecting the committee to preside over testimonies from the Twitter and Facebook chiefs “shortly” regardless of whether they come to the decision on their own volition.
“One way or another, either voluntarily or pursuant to subpoena, they will testify and they will testify before the election,” Cruz stated.
In a separate hearing for the Senate Commerce Committee, Zuckerberg and Dorsey will join Google CEO Sundar Pichai on October 28 for a hearing on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields Big Tech companies from a liability.
Cruz, who is a member of both Judiciary and Commerce committees, wants each panel to carry out their own hearings with the tech chiefs before election day. “I believe we need a separate hearing in Judiciary because the issues being discussed in the two committees are different,” Cruz remarked.
Big Tech has become too powerful, especially during a time when social media has become the de facto public square. Republicans will need to get serious about making online speech receive the same treatment as general political speech.
Crime3 days ago
North Carolina Police Officer Viciously Beaten as Onlookers Laugh, Film for 11 Minutes
Violent Left3 days ago
Left-Wing Terrorists Leave Ominous Notes on Homes Promising Destruction if President Trump Wins Re-Election
States3 days ago
HUGE: Phoenix, AZ Trump Parade Stretches 30 Miles, 1500 Vehicles
Tech3 days ago
Google Engineer Admits to Company’s Political Censorship, Election Interference in New Project Veritas Sting #ExposeGoogle
Campaign 20203 days ago
THE FIX IS IN: Presidential Debate Committee Scraps Foreign Policy Questions after Hunter Biden Scandal
Culture3 days ago
New York Times Confirms the ‘Great Replacement’ is No Conspiracy Theory in Anti-Trump Op/ed
The Swamp2 days ago
SHOCK CLAIM: Rudy Giuliani Says Hunter Biden Laptop Had Pictures of “Underage Girls,” Bizarre Texts
Campaign 20203 days ago
Presidential Debates Set to Ignore National Security, Immigration, and Second Amendment