Culture
BIG: Senate to Vote on Monday to Stop Infanticide
In yet another attempt to stop the killing of babies after they are born, the Senate has scheduled a vote to make infanticide illegal on Monday.
“Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has scheduled a Senate vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 311). A vote on the bill, which is being sponsored by Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), is expected on February 25,” according to Life News.
This will be the eighth total time that the bill has been proposed in Congress. Being proposed six times in the House and once in the Senate, each attempt has been shot down by Congressional Democrats.
Trending: Democrats Move to Ban Trump Supporters From Joining the Military and Holding Federal Jobs
Big League Politics reported about the proposed Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act:
take our poll - story continues belowCompleting this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.“The proposed Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, would ‘prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.’ Meaning, the infant would have to be rushed to a hospital after being born alive from a botched abortion.”
The previous attempt to pass the bill in the Senate was proposed by Sen. Ben Sasse from Nebraska, who avidly seeks to protect the unborn. Sen. Sasse’s request for a unanimous vote to make murder illegal was quickly shot down by abortion advocate Sen. Patty Murray, who believes that infanticide is a woman’s “right”.
Republicans scheduled a show vote on *another* bill attacking women’s rights & health—which leading medical groups have said should never become law. Democrats will stand w/ women, doctors, nurses, & everyone who truly cares about women’s health & rights & make sure it doesn't.
— Senator Patty Murray (@PattyMurray) February 15, 2019
In an interview with Family Research Council, Sen. Sasse explains his reasoning for sponsoring the bill:
“This bill is not actually about abortion. This is about a baby that has survived an abortion, and is born alive, and is on that table, cold, fighting for life, and crying out. And it’s about the practice that’s known as ‘backing away,’ where the abortion provider simply backs away from the table and leaves the baby to die from exposure and the elements.”
“On Monday night, you’re actually going to have a chance to see the United States Senate vote–individual senators–put their money where their mouth is and see if they’re actually going to stand with the little guy, because the little guy is that little guy or gal on that table fighting for life.”
Free Speech
Biden Rebuffs Advisors’ Demands to Censor OANN, Newsmax, Fox News By Executive Order
Biden advisors have sought to ban conservative media from federal housing.
According to a White House source, President Joe Biden has rebuffed suggestions that he sign an executive order that would ban certain conservative news networks from being broadcast to federal housing complexes.
The order would’ve named One America News Network, Newsmax, and Fox News by name. The former two networks are known for a broadly pro-Donald Trump editorial stance, with Fox split between establishment liberal and conservative content.
Authoritarian liberals advising President Biden are said to have suggested that Biden crack down on television and media networks which dissent from the administration’s policy views, citing the raucous US Capitol protest earlier this month as an imperative to clamp down on the opposition.
The executive order in question would most prominently affect military housing, where the cable channels in question are accessible through cable services contracted through the military services. The order, which never progressed beyond suggestions to President Biden, may even have gone so far as to restrict the television channels from private housing organizations contracted to provide lodging to military service members and their families.
Biden even went so far as to dismiss the censorship attempt as “nonsense,” according to a White House source familiar with the exchange. It’s likely that attempts to sign and enforce it would’ve been shut down by the judiciary, representing a clear attempt to discriminate against the very viewing of political expression within federal buildings.
As an authoritarian streak grows more prominent in the intolerant attitudes of American liberals, it appears President Biden himself is at least skeptical to the slightest degree of governmental censorship attempts, although Biden has never so much as even made reference to the censorship practices utilized by Big Tech companies against tens of millions of Americans.
Follow me on Gab @WildmanAZ, Twitter @Wildman_AZ, and on Parler @Moorhead.
-
White House4 days agoPresident Trump Contemplates Ditching the GOP, Starting New ‘Patriot Party’ to Put America First
-
Big League Economics4 days agoTrucking Industry Leaders Expect Biden’s Policies to Crush Small Trucking Companies
-
Politics3 days agoENOUGH ALREADY: QAnon Hucksters Now Claim Biden Will Execute ‘The Plan’
-
White House3 days agoBiden White House Makes YouTube Upload of Inaugural Speech ‘Unlisted’ After Being Flooded With Dislikes
-
The Swamp15 hours agoDemocrats Move to Ban Trump Supporters From Joining the Military and Holding Federal Jobs
-
Big League Guns3 days agoTexas Governor Abbott Wants Texas to Be a “Second Amendment Sanctuary”
-
Congress3 days ago115 House Republicans Sign Onto Effort to Remove Neocon Liz Cheney as GOP Chair
-
Big League Wellness1 day agoBiden Nullifies Trump Executive Order Issued to Reduce Prices of Insulin and Epinephrine
