Connect with us

Tech

BIG SISTER: Meet Twitter’s Globalist Foreign-Born Feminist Censorship Commissar

The feminist movement is creating cheerleaders for the Orwellian nightmare

Published

on

Last week, Twitter was put under the microscope on the Joe Rogan Experience (JRE) podcast as their top executives were forced to face tough questions from independent journalist Tim Pool. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey appeared with his legal counsel Vijaya Gadde to jump into the meat grinder.

The results were embarrassing for Twitter, as they were caught in many lies and contradictions:

https://twitter.com/polishpatriottm/status/1103079160430448641

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

At one point of the interview, the JRE livestream mysteriously died while Gadde was addressing censorship of conservatives. Investigators at the Clover Chronicle discovered hot mic audio that did not appear on the podcast that can be heard in full here. The transcript is as follows:

Gadde: …Want to follow up on a couple things because they worry me. You mentioned an Antifa account that doxxed policemen. Can you please just send that over to me?

Pool: Uh, [says bit.ly link].

Gadde: [Repeats link] And then, would you DM me the accounts that you said have threatened you?

Pool: No. I believe in minimizing harm and if… so, when Patreon…

Gadde: How about this. I won’t take action on the… but I want to understand why you didn’t take action on them and I can’t learn from that unless you [inaudible].

Pool: So, uh, when Lauren Southern got banned from Patreon, a lot of people were…

Rogan(?): Hold on. Stop! Everybody out of the room! This is streaming and it’s frozen. Something’s wrong.

Gadde was present during the entirety of the interview to run interference for Dorsey. She has risen to become one of the most influential employees of the corporation. In addition to being legal counsel, she serves as treasurer of Twitter’s political action committee suggesting that her connections to government officials are numerous and influential.

The information on her own Twitter account bolsters that theory.

https://twitter.com/iball/status/1103073634430664705

A more in-depth look into Gadde’s posts shows that she is clearly a full-fledged feminist operative working consciously to manipulate information in a way to promote the globalist agenda.

She has expressed sympathy for the anti-constitutional, anti-American policies of totalitarian gun control:

She parroted the ‘Never Trump’ lies of the fake news merchants at the New York Times:

She also believes in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory and spreads her brand of neo-McCarthyism to her followers:

Although George Orwell warned of Big Brother choking our freedoms, it may be Big Sister who ultimately comes to destroy our rights. Gadde and fellow feminists are fully on board with implementing the Orwellian nightmare.

Tech

Facebook Will Create “Oversight Board” For Users to Appeal Censorship Decisions

A smidgen of accountability.

Published

on

Facebook is planning on rolling out an “oversight board” to which users of the platform can appeal the censorship of content.

Over the next few weeks, our nearly 3 billion users will have access to an independent review of difficult content decisions,” announced the company in a Thursday blog post.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Facebook is describing the oversight board as a “global body of experts separate from Facebook that will make independent and binding decisions on the cases they choose to hear.” Facebook users will presumably have the option to appeal incidences of censorship to Facebook’s oversight board when they have exhausted use of Facebook’s existing censorship appeal process. However, the existing process is only available on a seemingly arbitrary basis, and it’s probably not unlikely that those who already aren’t in Facebook’s good graces won’t be allowed the opportunity to appeal to the oversight board.

The overseers are employed and selected by Facebook itself, casting serious doubt as to whether they’re genuinely impartial arbiters of social media censorship.

It’s hard to tell if this is a step in the right direction or merely a ruse for the monopoly to counter accusations that its arbitrary censorship process is undemocratic and authoritarian. In predictable fashion, the powerful Oversight Board is staffed almost exclusively with Soros-linked neoliberal progressives, some of whom have already advocated for a European understanding of “free speech” as opposed to an American one.

With great power comes great responsibility, and Facebook seems content to accept the former without the latter. It simply isn’t their place to declare what is permissible political speech.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending