Connect with us

Congress

Bitter pill: Cassidy-Graham Obamacare reform bill fails to reform 340B program

Published

on

The healthcare reform legislation proposed by Sen. William M. Cassidy (R.-La.) and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R.-S.C.) is a bill that fails to address the actual causes of high premiums, high deductibles and it leaves in places many of the programs President Barack Obama created and or expanded that have further corrupted our already inefficient healthcare system.

One program that has grown like cancer is the 340B program.

Never heard of it? Just Google “340B + jobs” and check out the veritable boomtown this program has launched.

Trending: March Study Points to Pervasive Mental Illness Among White American Liberals

The 340B Drug Discount Program illustrates an iron law of government. Namely, those good intentions are no guarantee of good results. Intended to benefit lower income and underserved patients, the absence of adequate safeguards on the drug discount program has instead led to decades of abuse as hospitals enrich themselves at the expense of patients and taxpayers.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Passed in 1992 as part of the Veteran Health Care Act, the 340B program compels pharmaceutical companies to sell discounted drugs to health care clinics and pharmacies serving lower income and underserved patients. The drug companies were allowed to “voluntarily” participate in 340B if they wanted their drugs to be eligible for purchase under Medicaid.

In 2003 eligibility of the program was expanded by the Medicare Modernization Act. With expanded access to the program came expanded opportunities for abuse thanks to the failure to at least require that the discounted price be passed on to intended consumers, if not to consider that this method for helping the poor access drugs might simply be fatally flawed. Hospitals gamed the system and took advantage of the program to purchase drugs discounted by 20-50 percent only to then charge patients the full price and pocket the difference as profit.

A consulting firm called Talyst even developed a good line of business teaching informed hospitals and pharmacies how they could take advantage of 340B to reap huge profits on the resale of discounted drugs.

Even though it was aimed at assisting small community hospitals that served patients that might otherwise fall through the cracks, the 340B program was exploited by large hospitals such as the Duke University Health System. In 2012, Duke University’s DukeHealth generated substantial revenue by purchasing $66 million in drugs through the program, at a savings of $48 million, only to turn around and sell them to patients for $136 million. The $70 million profit it realized from the 340B drugs came largely at the expense of taxpayers and did nothing to accomplish the program’s original goals.

Lacking any system of accountability, the 340B program allows hospitals and health clinics to take advantage of the public’s charitable instincts. It absurdly relies on beneficiaries to “police themselves,” according to a report from the Government Accountability Office.

One result of large hospitals gaming 340B has been to make cancer treatment more expensive. A study by the Community Oncology Alliance documents how the proliferation of hospital participation in 340B resulted in the consolidation of cancer care in larger, more expensive 340B hospitals rather than physician-owned community oncology clinics.

Since 2005, the number of hospitals participating in 340B has grown by 367 percent.

The program was expanded again under Obamacare, which allowed pharmacies to profit from participating in 340B while also increasing the number of participating hospitals from 14,000 to 20,000.

Don’t kid yourself, members of Congress on both sides of the aisle are willing to help the hospitals pilfer the program.  Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R.-Wash.) has joined hands with liberal members like Rep. Bobby Rush (D.-Ill.) seeking to extend the abuse!

Despite the opposition of special interests that have made out like bandits thanks to 340B, like the American Hospital Association and other representatives of the hospital industry, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is pushing much-needed reforms. They have proposed a rule reducing Medicare reimbursement payments to the hospitals benefiting from 340B to redistribute the savings elsewhere so that they finally reach patients. COA estimates the cuts will save seniors $180 million in drug costs per year.Congress was probably driven mostly by good intentions in creating the 340B program, but it failed to consider the incentives it was creating and thus failed to include needed safeguards against abuse. Much needed reforms can refocus 340B to serve its original purpose while closing an enormous crony capitalist benefit and arbitrage opportunity for mega-hospitals. Taxpayers and patients deserve better.

Congress was probably driven mostly by good intentions in creating the 340B program, but it failed to consider the incentives it was creating and thus failed to include needed safeguards against abuse. Much needed reforms can refocus 340B to serve its original purpose while closing an enormous crony capitalist benefit and arbitrage opportunity for mega-hospitals. Taxpayers and patients deserve better.

[Edward Woodson is a lawyer and now host of the nationally syndicated Edward Woodson Show, which airs daily from 3 to 6 pm EST on gcnlive.com.] 

Congress

Democrat Black Farmers Bill Would Give Away $8 Billion of Land Yearly in Reparations Program

South Africa-style land redistribution?

Published

on

Democrat Senators are touting new legislation that would purchase national farmland and give it away to Black Americans for free.

Democrats Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Elizabeth Warren are sponsoring the the Justice for Black Farmers Act, which seems likely to be the most wide-ranging affirmative action program ever enacted if it’s signed into law. It’s not inaccurate to call the bill a reparations program.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The law establishes preferences for Black Americans within Department of Agriculture policy. Blacks would be granted free land purchased by the federal government, in total increments that appear to add up to $8 billion a year.

An undersecretary of a USDA “Equitable Land Access Service” would be entrusted with purchasing(using taxpayer funds) and redistributing land. The reparation bill appropriates for a massive 20,000 grants annually over ten years, adding up to a total redistribution package of $80 billion.

The under-secretary would be commissioned to “(1) purchase from willing sellers, at a price not greater than fair market value, available agricultural land in the United States; and (2) subject to section 205, convey grants of that land to eligible Black individuals at no cost to the eligible Black individuals.

If the bill redistributes 160 acres per grant, it would ultimately end up transferring 1.6% of the total land in the continental United States for free.

Democrats cite a decline in the numbers of black farmers since the 1920’s as an impetus for the bill, pointing out that there were 1 million black farmers in 1920 and 50,000 today. Such logic ignores that the number of American farmers broadly has declined sharply as the United States transitioned to an industrial economy, and that millions of Black Americans who worked under poor conditions as sharecroppers in the American South have long since moved to northern cities.

The bill is somewhat similar to South African racial land redistribution policies, which differ primarily in that they forcibly nationalized land owned by Afrikaner farmers and redistributed them to South African Blacks. South Africa’s land reforms in the name of “equity” have proven to generally be a failure, with novel farmers unable to utilize the land they’ve been gifted in a manner beneficial to society. South Africa has transitioned from a bountiful agricultural society known as the “bread basket of Africa” to a net food importer, with experts pointing to arbitrary land redistribution as a factor in doing so.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending