Connect with us

Congress

Bitter pill: Cassidy-Graham Obamacare reform bill fails to reform 340B program

Published

on

The healthcare reform legislation proposed by Sen. William M. Cassidy (R.-La.) and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R.-S.C.) is a bill that fails to address the actual causes of high premiums, high deductibles and it leaves in places many of the programs President Barack Obama created and or expanded that have further corrupted our already inefficient healthcare system.

One program that has grown like cancer is the 340B program.

Never heard of it? Just Google “340B + jobs” and check out the veritable boomtown this program has launched.

Trending: Bezos-Linked Thinktank Official Calls for Michael Anton’s Execution for Exposing Anti-Trump Color Revolution

The 340B Drug Discount Program illustrates an iron law of government. Namely, those good intentions are no guarantee of good results. Intended to benefit lower income and underserved patients, the absence of adequate safeguards on the drug discount program has instead led to decades of abuse as hospitals enrich themselves at the expense of patients and taxpayers.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Passed in 1992 as part of the Veteran Health Care Act, the 340B program compels pharmaceutical companies to sell discounted drugs to health care clinics and pharmacies serving lower income and underserved patients. The drug companies were allowed to “voluntarily” participate in 340B if they wanted their drugs to be eligible for purchase under Medicaid.

In 2003 eligibility of the program was expanded by the Medicare Modernization Act. With expanded access to the program came expanded opportunities for abuse thanks to the failure to at least require that the discounted price be passed on to intended consumers, if not to consider that this method for helping the poor access drugs might simply be fatally flawed. Hospitals gamed the system and took advantage of the program to purchase drugs discounted by 20-50 percent only to then charge patients the full price and pocket the difference as profit.

A consulting firm called Talyst even developed a good line of business teaching informed hospitals and pharmacies how they could take advantage of 340B to reap huge profits on the resale of discounted drugs.

Even though it was aimed at assisting small community hospitals that served patients that might otherwise fall through the cracks, the 340B program was exploited by large hospitals such as the Duke University Health System. In 2012, Duke University’s DukeHealth generated substantial revenue by purchasing $66 million in drugs through the program, at a savings of $48 million, only to turn around and sell them to patients for $136 million. The $70 million profit it realized from the 340B drugs came largely at the expense of taxpayers and did nothing to accomplish the program’s original goals.

Lacking any system of accountability, the 340B program allows hospitals and health clinics to take advantage of the public’s charitable instincts. It absurdly relies on beneficiaries to “police themselves,” according to a report from the Government Accountability Office.

One result of large hospitals gaming 340B has been to make cancer treatment more expensive. A study by the Community Oncology Alliance documents how the proliferation of hospital participation in 340B resulted in the consolidation of cancer care in larger, more expensive 340B hospitals rather than physician-owned community oncology clinics.

Since 2005, the number of hospitals participating in 340B has grown by 367 percent.

The program was expanded again under Obamacare, which allowed pharmacies to profit from participating in 340B while also increasing the number of participating hospitals from 14,000 to 20,000.

Don’t kid yourself, members of Congress on both sides of the aisle are willing to help the hospitals pilfer the program.  Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R.-Wash.) has joined hands with liberal members like Rep. Bobby Rush (D.-Ill.) seeking to extend the abuse!

Despite the opposition of special interests that have made out like bandits thanks to 340B, like the American Hospital Association and other representatives of the hospital industry, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is pushing much-needed reforms. They have proposed a rule reducing Medicare reimbursement payments to the hospitals benefiting from 340B to redistribute the savings elsewhere so that they finally reach patients. COA estimates the cuts will save seniors $180 million in drug costs per year.Congress was probably driven mostly by good intentions in creating the 340B program, but it failed to consider the incentives it was creating and thus failed to include needed safeguards against abuse. Much needed reforms can refocus 340B to serve its original purpose while closing an enormous crony capitalist benefit and arbitrage opportunity for mega-hospitals. Taxpayers and patients deserve better.

Congress was probably driven mostly by good intentions in creating the 340B program, but it failed to consider the incentives it was creating and thus failed to include needed safeguards against abuse. Much needed reforms can refocus 340B to serve its original purpose while closing an enormous crony capitalist benefit and arbitrage opportunity for mega-hospitals. Taxpayers and patients deserve better.

[Edward Woodson is a lawyer and now host of the nationally syndicated Edward Woodson Show, which airs daily from 3 to 6 pm EST on gcnlive.com.] 

Congress

He Found His Spine: Vulnerable Senator Cory Gardner Vows to Support Trump’s SCOTUS Nominee

Gardner found his backbone.

Published

on

Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) has often been at odds with the Trump movement, being a favorite of the GOP establishment’s Senate Leadership Fund.

This is why his recent declaration that he will be supporting President Donald Trump’s choice to succeed the deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg is so surprising. He made the announcement in a Twitter post on Monday.

“When a President exercises constitutional authority to nominate a judge for the Supreme Court vacancy, the Senate must decide how to best fulfill its constitutional duty of advice and consent,” Gardner said in his official statement.

“I have and will continue to support judicial nominees who will protect the Constitution, not legislate from the bench, and uphold the law. Should a qualified nominee who meets this criteria be put forward, I will vote to confirm,” he added.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The official statement can be seen here:

The president’s pick for the Supreme Court will certainly fit Gardner’s criteria. Trump has announced that he will be appointing a woman to the bench.

One top contender – Amy Comey Barrett – recently made a trip to the White House, as Big League Politics has reported:

Judge Amy Coney Barrett visited the White House on Monday, as President Donald Trump zeroes in on selecting a nominee to fill the vacant seat on the US Supreme Court.

Barrett is reportedly a front-runner for the judicial nomination. She’s a generally conservative judge, with a staunch pro-life record. Her track record on immigration law issues is generally conservative.

Barrett currently serves as a circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has advised President Trump that she is his preferred candidate for the seat on the court.

President Trump had confirmed that he plans to nominate a woman to fill the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who died of complications from pancreatic cancer on Friday.

Democrats have launched a full-fledged fit urging President Trump to give them a break and decline to nominate a conservative justice, but they won’t be so lucky. Republican Senators and President Trump have rallied around the notion of appointing a justice before the November election, fulfilling their constitutional responsibilities.

Trump confirmed that he would be revealing the identity of his judicial nominee on Friday or Saturday, taking a few extra days to vet candidates. Florida Judge Barbara Lagoa is reportedly another candidate being considered for the nomination.

It’ll be inherently harder for incensed, power-thirsty Democrats to attack a female judicial candidate. Maybe they’ll alienate swing female voters through waging a scorched earth campaign to block the confirmation of Barrett, who is a mother of seven.

The Republicans have a great opportunity to score a major political victory and really stick it to the extreme Left with this expedited SCOTUS confirmation. The fact that a moderate like Gardner is on board is a great sign that the confirmation is likely to occur before November’s election.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending