Connect with us

Around The World

Bogus Fact Checking Organization Obfuscates for Bill That Could Send Christians To Jail in Canada

AFP Fact Checker is using deception to promote the anti-Christian agenda.

Published

on

AFP Fact Check issued a “correction” regarding analysis of legislation being considered in Ontario that would criminalize Christian protests under the guise of hate speech.

In the article published by Big League Politics on May 11, it was explained how the nebulous language of Bill 84, the “Prohibiting Hate-Promoting Demonstrations at Queen’s Park Act, 2019,”, was written to punish Christian speech if it offends victim groups such as Muslims or the LGBT community.

Life Site News explains how the new law will work once enacted:

Trending: Democrats Move to Ban Trump Supporters From Joining the Military and Holding Federal Jobs

The problem with this bill, however, lies in the fact that the definition of “hate” is uncertain under Canadian law. As a result, unfortunately, the use of the word “hate” can be a useful tool for some to prevent differing views from being expressed. That is, the word “hate” can be used to silence opposing views expressed when, in fact, the views are simply a reasonable expression of belief.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This concern is based on actual experience. Canadians have already experienced the contempt shown by the Supreme Court of Canada towards Section 2 of the Charter of Rights which provides for freedom of opinion, expression and religion. In the Trinity Western Christian University case (2018), a private Christian university’s moral covenant was deemed hateful and discriminating. In the Bill Whatcott case (2013), the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that the effects of an expression used, not the communicator’s intent, are what is relevant. The court went on to conclude that “truthful statements and sincerely held beliefs do not affect the finding of “hate”. Mr. Whatcott merely expressed in his pamphlet the well-established facts about homosexuality which the court held to be “hateful”. It is worth noting that the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, presumably consisting of equally learned judges, had previously concluded that the pamphlet was not hateful. The Supreme Court of Canada prides itself on being a “progressive” court and has an established bias as evidenced in a series of decisions that have struck down laws based on traditional values. There is little likelihood that the court will protect tradition-based groups if they are denied the right to demonstrate at the provincial legislature.

The AFP Fact Checker, in their dubious analysis of the accurate Big League Politics report, merely cited lip service from the bill’s sponsor and provided no substantial analysis on how the bill would actually be enforced once enacted.

“It’s inconceivable, given the way that the bill is drafted, that it could be used to suppress the free speech of Christian Ontarians or of any other religions,” said MP Roman Baber to AFP Fact Checker.

Baber also said that the legislation was based off of Section 319 of the Canadian Criminal Code, which punishes free speech with up to two years in prison if it is seemed hateful and abusive by the government.

The relevant provisions read as follows:

(1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Meanwhile, a Christian pastor named David Lynn was arrested and charged with disturbing the peace last week for preaching the word of God on a street corner in Toronto, ON.

After the disciple of Christ was harassed by a group of unruly protesters, he was hauled off in handcuffs by law enforcement because preaching the Gospel was considered to be a criminal violation. The LGBT mob cheered as his rights were flagrantly violated.

A police officer even accosted the individual recording the incident, which can be seen here:

“It’s unfortunate that I am subject to this kind of discrimination and bullying and marginalization simply for saying God loves you, there is hope for you, I accept you and tolerate you. I shouldn’t be in this position, I didn’t do anything illegal,” Lynn said following his arrest. He is now out on bond.

When AFP Fact Checker and power-grabbing lawmakers like Baber talk about how existing law will be codified in Bill 84, this is exactly what they are referring to.

Even after they were alerted of their error, AFP Fact Checker stood by their work and refused to take down their article.

“We found no evidence that Bill 84 is specifically targeting Christians or would ban Christians from demonstrating in public,” they said in a e-mail response to Big League Politics.

The BLP article did not claim the anti-free speech measure would target Christians specifically, only that Christians will end up in the crossfire as evidenced by the recent arrest of a Christian pastor.

Turns out it is not just submissive bureaucrats, child-targeting LGBT activists, radical Muslims, and the fake news out to discriminate against Christians. They have also set up bogus fact checking agencies to do their bigoted dirty work against the world’s most persecuted faith as well.

Around The World

Chinese Public Health Officials Use Anal Swabs to Test for COVID-19 in Children

WTF!?!?!

Published

on

Officials in Beijing are using anal swabs to test for COVID-19 in children as young as nine years old, arguing that this manner of testing is more effective than traditional measures.

Li Tongzeng, who works as deputy director in charge of infectious disease for Beijing You’an Hospital, is claiming that COVID-19 lasts longer in the anus. This is the public health reason being used to violate children in China.

Yang Zhanqiu, who works as deputy director for the pathogen biology department at Wuhan University, believes that anal swabs are not adequate for testing. He argues that nasal and throat swabs are more effective because the virus is typically contracted through the upper respiratory tract.

“There have been cases concerning the coronavirus testing positive in a patient’s excrement, but no evidence has suggested it had been transmitted through one’s digestive system,” Yang said. 

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024?

  • POLL: Will Republican Senators vote to impeach Trump and ban him from running in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Big League Politics has reported on how COVID-19 is being used to normalize practices that would have seemed invasive and unconscionable prior to the crisis:

The late plutocrat and engineer of globalism David Rockefeller once said at a United Nations dinner: “All we need is the right crisis and the people will accept the New World Order.”

With COVID-19, it seems that the right crisis has finally arrived to usher in the new era of globalism. The mass media is already priming the public for the new permanent changes to society that are all but inevitable at this point.

BBC News has laid out their grand vision of the Orwellian “new normal” of what the central planners and technocrats intend society to look like by 2022.

“It’s 2022 and you’ve just arrived at the travel destination of your dreams. As you get off the plane, a robot greets you with a red laser beam that remotely takes your temperature. You’re still half asleep after a long transoceanic flight, so your brain barely registers the robot’s complacent beep. You had just passed similar checks when boarding the plane hours ago so you have nothing to worry about and can just stroll to the next health checkpoint,” BBC reporter Lina Zeldovich wrote.

Zeldovich lays out the reality of endless health checks, breathalyzers with microchips in them, and microscopic ink tattoos to track vaccine compliance. All of this would be required in airports to travel, at first, and then be rolled out as mandatory to participate in normal functions of society.

She notes that the mark-of-the-beast vaccine tracking tattoo has already been tested on animals and corpses, thanks to the generous support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

“The macro-needles don’t leave scars and are less invasive than the regular needles – it’s like putting on a Band-Aid,” said researcher Ana Jaklenec of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “It can even be done with a modified phone.”

It may not be long before public health professionals in the West are arguing that children need to be violated with anal swabs to keep them safe from COVID-19.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending