Former President George H.W. Bush has been re-imagined as an American hero because of his dogged opposition to President Donald Trump before he died, but that perception is far from reality. Bush sold his country down the river during his years serving the Washington D.C. swamp and reportedly tormented his poor, old, faithful wife while executing his globalist schemes.
Susan Page, author of “The Matriarch: Barbara Bush and the Making of an American Dynasty” scheduled for release tomorrow, said that George’s infidelities throughout the 1970s put Barbara through hell and made her depressed to the point of where she even contemplated suicide.
“Barbara Bush found herself falling into the worst personal crisis she had faced since daughter Robin had died more than two decades earlier,” Page said. “Overwhelmed by pain and loneliness, she contemplated suicide.”
“She would pull over to the side of the road until the impulse to plow into a tree or drive into the path of an oncoming car had passed,” Page added.
George allegedly broke his marital vows and betrayed his wife with Jennifer Fitzgerald, who had served as his personal aide since he ran the Republican National Committee in 1973-1974. George did not mind sticking his pen in company ink, so to speak, as one of the perks of being a big shot of the Republican establishment.
Barbara told Page she knew of the affair, that it left her miserable for many years, and she would cry at night alone wondering “why he didn’t leave me.” She struggled through the rest of the marriage maintaining appearances for the cameras.
When George took over the Central Intelligence Agency in 1975, his secretive nature only worsened the situation and Barbara’s misery worsened from there. George would not be held accountable for his infidelities on the job, as David Petraeus was for his in 2012 when he was forced to resign. Bush’s connections ran far too deep for him to ever be held accountable for his many public and private failures.
George certainly disrespected his poor wife, but he disrespected the U.S. Constitution even worse during his decades working for the federal swamp. Bush resigned in outrage from the National Rifle Association following the Oklahoma City Bombing because they criticized federal enforcement of gun control. He even voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, as one of his last dying wishes was for globalism to continue to reign over America.
Per The Intercept:
Worse, Bush was at the helm of the Iran-Contra cover-up. Independent counsel Lawrence Walsh, who was given the job of investigating Iran-Contra, called Bush a “president who has such a contempt for honesty [and] arrogant disregard for the rule of law.”
Per The Intercept,
“Bush’s role in the Iran-Contra scandal shows that his legacy is far darker than what is being reported amid his death and funeral. The truth is that he coddled dictators and death squads, undermined democratic institutions, and trashed the Constitution.”
George’s eponymous son would follow in daddy’s footsteps to become President and blow the elder Bush’s globalist record out of the water. In addition to starting the disastrous Iraq War, George Jr. allowed the third-world invasion to spiral out of control as President and remains a proponent of illegal immigration despite the unprecedented border crisis. George Jr. is still pushing the Russian collusion narrative to this very moment despite his former FBI boss Robert Mueller finding no evidence with his former top officials spreading conspiracy theories through the mainstream media to divide the country.
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush didn’t get his turn to wreck America because he was humiliated by President Trump in 2016. There is another generation of the Bush family coming up the pike to rule over us – such as Jeb’s half-Mexican son, George P. Bush, who serves as Land Commissioner of Texas. George P. is already working on “re-imagining” the Alamo. Considering the family’s track record, George P. Bush and others from this cursed brood must be soundly rejected to ensure that Trump’s nationalist GOP remains intact for generations to come.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Did Bernie Sanders Just Endorse a Neocon Regime Change Foreign Policy?
Is Bernie Sanders the anti-war candidate that many non-interventionists are making him out to be?
Journalists Jacob Crosse and Barry Grey presented some interesting observations about Sanders’ foreign policy views.
Sanders criticized the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani in January and also stressed his opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
During the Iowa presidential debate, Sanders loudly boasted, “I not only voted against that war, I helped lead the effort against that war.”
However, Sanders changed his tune when chatting with the New York Times.
The answers the Sanders campaign gave the Times showed its flexibility when it comes to foreign policy.
In other words, the Sanders campaign signaled to the military and intelligence apparatus that Sanders won’t present a threat to their interests and may actually carry out their interventionist agenda.
One question in the survey that the Times sent the Sanders campaign stuck out above the rest.
The third survey question asked, “Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?”
The Sanders campaign responded, “Yes.”
Based on this response, Sanders’ is signaling that he’s willing to continue Bush-era policies of “preemptive war.”
Like Obama, Sanders’ opposition to the Iraq War was a matter of politics rather than a principled opposition to regime change wars.
His campaign was also asked, “Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?”
Sanders responded, “Yes.”
Some of the wars that the U.S. carried out in the name of “human rights” have been the Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia in the 1990s along with the aerial campaign against Libya in 2011 and the Civil War launched in Syria.
All in all, Sanders’ pro-peace/non-interventionist image is at best window dressing.
Under a Sanders presidency, the interventionist status quo will likely stay in place.
News4 days ago
Bernie Sanders 2020 ‘Win’ in NH Netted a LOSS OF 80,000 VOTES from 2016
News4 days ago
Virginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
Violent Left3 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
News3 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
Tech4 days ago
More Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
Violent Left4 days ago
New Hampshire Thug Arrested After Assaulting ‘MAGA’ Hat-Wearing 15-Year Old at Polling Site
Deep State4 days ago
Bill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
Culture3 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children
Violent Left4 days ago
Wife of ‘Proud Boys’ Member Imprisoned for Self-Defense Pleads for Help for Their Three Children
The Swamp2 days ago
SWAMP: FBI Press Officer Accepted Baseball Tickets From CNN Reporter
News4 days ago
GUILTY: Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti Convicted in Extortion Trial
Politics4 days ago
MIT Warns That Voting App Used in Several States is Vulnerable for Hackers to ‘Alter, Stop or Expose’ Votes