With just twenty-four hours to review, the omnibus spending bill is expected to be voted on late in the evening on Thursday. Despite the fact that virtually nobody has had time to read the entire bill, it is poised to pass, especially with the support of House Speaker Paul Ryan.
But deep within the bill, a number of major issues have been found. Most alarmingly, the bill specifically blocks funding towards Trump’s wall. It orders that border security funding go towards “operationally effective designs” such as “currently deployed steel bollard designs.” That means that this bill does nothing more than provide funds to lay out more of the previous, and less effective border fencing.
(b) The amounts designated in subsection (a)(2) 15 through (a)(4) shall only be available for operationally ef fective designs deployed as of the date of the Consolidated 17 Appropriations Act, 2017, (Public Law 115–31), such as 18 currently deployed steel bollard designs, that prioritize 19 agent safety.
With the above language, it allows Democrats to correctly claim that they blocked Trump’s wall, but give Republicans the ability to claim that they supported increased border security while doing almost nothing. Either way, it’s a lose-lose for any American concerned about illegal immigration.
Another controversial provision of the omnibus spending bill is funding for a proposal known as “Fix-NICS.” Instead of attempting to pass it on its own, which has failed on numerous occasions, it appears that Republicans in congress have plugged the bill, which has support from a number of high-profile Democrats, including Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) into the massive spending bill.
SEC. 601. of the omnibus spending bill is titled the “FIX NICS ACT,” and is the same bill that anti-gun Republicans and Democrats have failed to pass in the past.
Fix-NICS provides massive funding to states to encourage them to input more people into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to bar them from firearm ownership.
The NICS system has already been massively abused, disproportionately targeting veterans. Over 257,000 veterans have already been barred from firearm ownership without any due process, and this funding only gives them the ammo they need to throw even more veterans into the NICS database.
If the omnibus bill makes its way to President Trump’s desk, it is unclear if he will sign it. Trump has already signaled that he may veto it if it does not include wall funding. Also, some members of the House Freedom Caucus are opposing the measure, and encouraging Trump to veto it.
Democrat Congressmen Introduce Term Limits Legislation for SCOTUS Justices As Trump Prepares Nominee
Three Democrat members of Congress are introducing legislation to institute term limits for Supreme Court justices, as President Trump prepares to nominate his third candidate for the court following the death of progressive liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Democrats Joe Kennedy, Ro Khanna, and Don Beyer are proposing legislation that would limit SCOTUS justice to a maximum term of eighteen years on the court.
Lifetime appointments to the highest court in our land undermine our democratic process and erode progress in our nation.
We must enact 18 year term limits on our Supreme Court justices to continue our march towards a more perfect union. https://t.co/9fCyggP686
— Rep. Joe Kennedy III (@RepJoeKennedy) September 25, 2020
Khanna has proposed an idea that would allow Presidents to appoint two judges in each term. “Senior” members of the court would be required to basically retired for every new member of the court.
When I first ran for Congress in 2014, I proposed limiting terms of Supreme Court Justice to 18-appointments.
Given the recent, dramatic politicization of the Court, it's time for real reform.
— Rep. Don Beyer (@RepDonBeyer) September 25, 2020
It’s pretty funny the Democrats are uniting behind these proposals the moment they appear primed to lose control of the Supreme Court for a generation. They weren’t complaining when Obama was trying to replace Antonin Scalia with progressive Merrick Garland, even going so far as claiming that the stealth liberal was entitled to the seat. Reports emerging Friday suggest that President Donald Trump intends to nominate Amy Coney Barrett, a mostly conservative judge with a pro-life and immigration hawk judicial record.
The judicial branch of government is arguably the most flawed element of American governance, and it’s highly questionable how institutions such as the Supreme Court are able to appoint themselves a nearly unlimited amount of political power.
A better reform proposals would be to institute term limits for justices that only go into effect after the current members of the court vacate their seats. Anything else is simply a political power grab.
Big League Wellness3 days ago
CDC Admits There is No Proof COVID-19 is Airborne Virus and They Have Been Misleading the Public All Along
Black Lives Matter4 days ago
Say His Name, Rowan Sweeney: 4-Year-Old White Boy Murdered in Ohio by Black Thug in Targeted Execution
Culture3 days ago
Left-Wing Scholar Pushes to Censor Social Media Accounts Opposing Child Sex Trafficking by Tying Them to QAnon Movement
Riots4 days ago
SHOCK FOOTAGE: Los Angeles Motorist Is Attacked, Swarmed, and Chased by Massive Mob of BLM Thugs
Deplorables3 days ago
Sarah Palin Considering Primary Challenge to RINO Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski
Videos3 days ago
VIDEO: Slow Joe Calls U.S. Troops ‘Stupid Bastards’ After They Refused to Clap for His Remarks
Campaign 20202 days ago
WATCH: Joe Biden Reads Teleprompter Incorrectly: “I Got to the Senate 180 Years Ago”
Campaign 20203 days ago
Republican Voter Registration is Surging in Florida, Arizona, and Pennsylvania in the Runup to the November Election