In another act of Jew hatred and anti-Israel bias, Twitter has stopped translating Hebrew tweets.
Many Twitter users began to notice Twitter’s abrupt decision to stop translating Hebrew tweets when they visited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s account to read his tweets following Israel’s attack on Syria and his announcement that he’d be traveling to Brazil for the inauguration of pro-Israel Brazilian President elect Jair Bolsonaro, who vowed to move Brazil’s embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.
In the past, all tweets in Hebrew (and other languages) were featured, followed by English text that gave twitter users the option to “translate tweet”.
Now, when users visit profiles that post in Hebrew, the Hebrew language is no longer translated.
How are Twitter users who don’t speak Hebrew supposed to keep up with Israeli politics and developments in the Middle east pertaining to Israel and the Jewish people?
Twitter doesn’t seem to care, as their decision to stop translating Hebrew tweets came with no explanation, and appears to have been casually implemented without an announcement this week. Jewish, Israeli, and Hebrew speaking Twitter users were not informed of Twitter’s decision to stop translating Hebrew, which has effectively cut off all Israeli twitter users and Hebrew speakers from the non Hebrew twitter sphere.
Examples: Hebrew tweets from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), and Yuval Rotem, Director General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel are no longer being translated on Twitter.
In case you were wondering, Twitter is still translating Arabic tweets. You will no longer be able to translate the Hebrew tweets from Israel’s Prime Minister or the IDF, but at least you’ll be able to translate tweets posted by Palestinian terrorists in Hamas about how it’s a form of betrayal to normalize judaism and zionism!
صلاح: التطبيع مع العدو الصهيوني خيانة لشعوب الأمة وقيمها وأخلاقها.
— حركة حماس (@hamasinfo) December 23, 2018
Twitter’s decision to essentially erase Jews and Israeli’s from Twitter by cutting off the translate option is an act of anti-jewish aggression against the Jewish people and their homeland. By refusing to recognize Hebrew as a language that ought to be translated on one of the world’s largest social media platforms, Twitter is signaling that Israel and the Jewish people do not deserve to be heard.
It is yet another disturbing piece of evidence that supports recent claims that Twitter and Facebook are pro-Sharia social media networks that exhibit bias against Jews.
Why are Twitter and Facebook silencing Jews?
Put simply, Twitter is funded by Saudi Arabia and thus their terms of service policies are pro-Sharia and anti-First Amendment. This is why Twitter keeps banning conservatives, Jews, and Christians. It is worth noting that Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal owns more Twitter stock than Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. The Saudi billionaire doubled his stake in Twitter in 2015.
In fact, banning people with Israeli passports and Israeli stamps in their passport from visiting Saudi Arabia is a long-standing practice in Saudi Arabia, as well as many other Muslim majority countries that have implemented Sharia law.
On November 21, I was permanently banned by twitter as a Jewish Conservative journalist after posting a tweet critical of Congresswoman elect Ilhan Omar, who is anti-Jewish. My tweet was not hateful, and it didn’t violate the Twitter terms of service, but Twitter deemed my pro-Jewish tweet condemning Jew hatred to be a form of “hate speech”, and as a result, my account of nearly 265,000 followers was banned, forever.
In response to my Twitter ban and Silicon Valley Sharia, I handcuffed myself to Twitter HQ in NYC on November 29, 2018. While handcuffed, I wore a yellow Juden star, identical to those worn by Jews in the time leading up to the Holocaust. Just like the Nazis made lists of political dissidents who they marked and banned with yellow stars, Twitter, Facebook, and Google are modern day techno-fascists in the way they are silencing Conservatives, Jews, and Christians who dare speak truth about Islam, terrorism, and Jew hatred.
During my protest, while I held a sign that read “Jew hatred, A-Ok! Nosey Jew? BANNED” at Twitter, I said,
“Twitter, Facebook, Apple, Google, Instagram, they are essentially upholding Sharia. Silicon Valley is essentially upholding Sharia when they decide to ban me for posting facts about Islam, when they decide to ban me for posting facts about Sharia law and criticizing an anti-Jewish Muslim Congresswoman.”
Earlier this month, Facebook banned Yair Netanyahu, the son of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a post critical of Islamic terrorists. Yair’s post, which was in response to the death of the two IDF soldiers killed by Palestinian terrorists in Givat Assaf, was removed by Facebook, and he was issued a 24 hour ban on his account.
Facebook deleted Yair’s post in which he said he’d “prefer” if “All the Muslims leave the land of Israel.”
How is it that a Jewish Conservative journalist and the Israeli Prime Minister’s son get banned on social media for posting facts about Islam, but Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Louis Farrakhan, and Iranian dictators who chant “death to Israel” and “death to America” and have all expressed hatred of Jews have verified Facebook and Twitter accounts?
Through their pro-Sharia terms of service, Facebook and Twitter are clearly signaling that it’s ok to be a terrorist, but not ok to be Conservative, Jewish, Christian, or pro-Israel.
Here is more supporting evidence that big tech social media companies are anti-Jewish:
In July 2018, Mark Zuckerberg sparked outrage when he said he didn’t see a reason to ban Holocaust deniers on Facebook. Meanwhile, he finds it very necessary to ban Conservatives and Jews.
In October 2018, Twitter released a statement saying it was not a violation of their terms of service when Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, called Jews termites. Twitter said they would not ban Farrakhan, even though he has called for Jews to be eradicated and publicly proclaimed “Hitler was a great man”.
In November 2018, Twitter was forced to apologize after they allowed for #KillAllJews to trend for several hours.
In November 2018, Airbnb withdrew listings of Israeli homes in Judea and Samaria, in an attempt to side with the Palestinians and BDS movement.
You get the point.
Why does Twitter find it unnecessary to translate the language of the Jewish people and the tweets of the Israeli Prime Minister while they actively translate the tweets of a terrorist organization that states in its own charter that killing Jews and destroying Israel is their mission?
Hamas has been classified as a designated terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department and is listed as a co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial in 2008, which is the largest terrorism financing case in U.S. history. In the Covenant of Hamas, which outlines the goals and motive of Hamas and its members, it states that one of its main goals in the destruction of Israel.
“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.”
Twitter, which is an American company, did not respond to a request for comment regarding the reason why they no longer translate Hebrew tweets and why they are giving a platform to Islamic terrorist organizations like HAMAS.
Reactions to Twitter ending translations of Hebrew tweets:
— I like cats (@sxcsoho) December 26, 2018
Jewish Graves Vandalized in South Africa. World wide the tone of #Antisemitism is growing. Right here on @Twitter they just stopped offering Translate from Hebrew to Silence Israeli PM Netanyahu.
Meanwhile accounts of Farrakhan and Sasour untouched. Why @Jack? @JackPosobiec https://t.co/7YfG47p3X6
— UnitedVoteRed (@UnitedVoteRed) December 28, 2018
Laura Loomer is a conservative investigative journalist and activist. Originally from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover journalist for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications. Support Laura Loomer’s Independent Journalism here: PayPal.me/lauraloomer
Follow Laura Loomer on Instagram.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Banished Journalist Laura Loomer’s $1.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tech Giants Will Be Heard in Court
Loomer will have her day in court.
Banished journalist and Florida U.S. House candidate Laura Loomer’s lawsuit against Big Tech will be heard in the court of law following an order in the D.C. Circuit on Thursday.
Loomer is accusing tech giants such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter of conspiring to suppress conservative voices on their platforms. The lawsuit is challenging these monolithic corporations for allegedly violating antitrust law as well as the 1st Amendment of the Constitution.
Her lawsuit had been previously tossed out by U.S. District Judge Trever N. McFadden, a Trump appointee to the bench, who stated that “while selective censorship of the kind alleged by the plaintiffs may be antithetical to the American tradition of freedom of speech, it is not actionable under the First Amendment unless perpetrated by a state actor.” However, Loomer was able to use a recent court ruling to resurrect her lawsuit despite the initial setback.
Loomer’s legal team, led by the right-wing political interest group Freedom Watch, used the precedent of Packingham v. North Carolina, a ruling which determined that it was unconstitutional to ban sex offenders from social media. The case essentially set the precedent that social media is a 1st Amendment right.
“Many of the principles set forth by the Supreme Court in Packingham lead to what appellants believe is the natural progression of the law to hold that social media companies are liable for First Amendment violations, given the progression of technology and its infiltration into the daily lives of nearly every single person,” Loomer’s team said in their final brief presented to the court.
Loomer points to Twitter banning her from the platform at the end of 2018 after she said that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) adheres to a religion in which “women are abused” and “forced to wear the hijab.” She was similarly banned from Instagram for her assertion that Islam is “a cancer on humanity,” and Facebook, which owns Instagram, quickly followed suit and banned her even though the offending post was not made on that platform.
Loomer still cannot get her accounts restored despite the fact that she is running for the U.S. House in Florida’s 21st Congressional District, which could be considered a form of electoral interference.
Through her legal fight against the tech giants, Loomer is forcing them to reveal that they are no longer neutral platforms:
The tech behemoth Facebook has admitted that it is a publisher while defending its arbitrary censorship of banished journalist Laura Loomer, according to court documents.
Facebook banned Loomer’s account from their platform during a purge of popular conservative voices that happened in May. Others targeted by the purge included Milo Yiannopoulos, Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson. Loomer is striking back with a lawsuit that is unearthing some interesting revelations about the social media monolith.
“Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else’s message,” Facebook’s attorneys wrote.
Facebook actually has the audacity to claim that their 1st Amendment rights are being violated by Loomer’s lawsuit, in a total contorting of reality. They have filed a motion to dismiss the case.
“She claims Facebook labeled her as a ‘dangerous’ person who promotes hate – yet, the First Amendment has long protected such statements because they are opinions that are not capable of being proven true or false,” Facebook’s attorneys claim in their dismissal motion.
Right now, Facebook is protected under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act from being held liable for the content published on their platform. This special exemption worked fine when the social network engaged in relative neutrality, but those days are no more as Big Tech is at war with conservative and pro-Trump voices.
Loomer hopes to have her ability to communicate fully restored and to make Big Tech pay for infringing on her basic rights.
Trending on BLP
Deep State3 days ago
ACCOUNTABILITY: President Trump Fires Deep State Snitch Who Triggered Impeachment Hysteria
Big League Wellness4 days ago
Expert Warns That Fears of Chinese Coronavirus Being a Bioweapon Should Not Be Dismissed
Tech3 days ago
Banished Journalist Laura Loomer’s $1.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tech Giants Will Be Heard in Court
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments
Big League Economics3 days ago
This Wall Street Firm Has Quietly Gained Control Over the Financial Sector During Coronavirus Panic
Campaign 20203 days ago
Joe Rogan Endorses Donald Trump Over Joe Biden, Citing Cognitive Decline
Big League Wellness2 days ago
New York Storefronts Boarded Up as Burglaries Rise 75%
News4 days ago
Woke Leftists Upset Over Christian Organzation Setting Up Hospital for Coronavirus Patients