Britain continues its slide toward totalitarianism as the globalists in charge allow more Muslims to flood into the country. A recent decision by British authorities to deny asylum to a Christian refugee from Iran shows exactly how backwards the once proud nation has become.
British authorities rejected the unnamed individual’s request in an defamatory, offensive repudiation of Christianity, essentially endorsing the cruel tyranny facing the man in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The bureaucrats cherry-picked several passages of the Bible in order to denigrate the religion.
“These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it is a ‘peaceful’ religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge,” the British Home Office wrote to the man in their letter.
Nathan Stevens, who works as a caseworker for the asylum seeker, posted excerpts from the rejection letter in a tweet:
— Nathan Stevens (@nathestevens) March 19, 2019
“Whatever your views on faith, how can a government official arbitrarily pick bits out of a holy book and then use them to trash someone’s heartfelt reason for coming to a personal decision to follow another faith?” Stevens asked in another tweet.
Legal analyst Conor James McKinney, a left-wing activist who runs the pro-migrant blog Free Movement, believes this isn’t an example of anti-Christian bias but rather is evidence that even more refugees need to be resettled throughout Britain with fewer restrictions and lax oversight.
“You can see from the text of the letter that the writer is trying to pick holes in the asylum seeker’s account of their conversion to Christianity and using the Bible verses as a tool to do that,” McKinney said to The Guardian.
“The Home Office is notorious for coming up with any reason they can to refuse asylum and this looks like a particularly creative example, but not necessarily a systemic outbreak of anti-Christian sentiment in the department,” he added.
Contrary to McKinney’s points, the numbers show that Muslims do not seem to have much of a problem obtaining asylum in Britain. Pew Research estimates that the Islamic population of Britain is expected to swell to 13 million in 2050 from a little over 4 million in 2016. Mohammad has emerged as the most popular name for babies born in Britain for many years now.
With the Conservative Party unwilling to stand up to the third-world onslaught, Britain is no longer a nation that can provide refuge to a Christian from Muslim tyranny.
Baghdad Bombings Could Give Biden Administration Excuse to Increase US Presence in Iraq
The first major Baghdad bombings in three years happen on Joe Biden’s first full day as president.
Two suicide bombings rocked a marketplace in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad on Thursday, killing at least 32 people and wounding over 100. As of now no one has claimed responsibility, although Iraqi military leaders suspect the Islamic State, the paramilitary group often referred to as “ISIS” in years past.
Major General Tahsin al-Khafaji said that the first suicide bomber shouted in the marketplace that he was not feeling well, and when a group of people drew near him, he detonated an explosive belt he was wearing. Not long after that, a second suicide bomber then detonated his own belt several feet away.
This was Baghdad’s first major bombing in three years, and interestingly enough it came on the first full day of Joe Biden’s presidency. Even the Associated Press pointed out that “many questioned the timing of the attack.”
“The US-led coalition recently ceased combat activities and is gradually drawing down its troop presence in Iraq,” the article reads.
The Jerusalem Post also writes that the bombings provide Biden with “an early opportunity to show US support for Iraq.”
“Biden has said that the US is ‘back’ and the world can expect the US to care again about foreign policy and work multilaterally to solve problems,” said the Post.
All this leads many to believe that the Biden administration will once again increase the US presence in Iraq, thereby dragging us deeper into a situation that the Trump administration had been eager to get out of.
This is not the first time that a Middle Eastern tragedy has coincided with a change of power. In March of 2017, two months after Donald Trump’s inauguration, the Assad government in Syria allegedly used chemical weapons against its own people, leading to international outcry and the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to launch an April 7 missile strike on the Syrian government’s Shayrat Airbase.
Bombings and attacks have also been known to happen shortly after the US announces commitments to scale back military operations.
Perhaps groups like the Islamic State feel emboldened by such announcements and power changes. In any case, the military-industrial complex often uses such attacks to justify never-ending involvement in the Middle East. As of now, however, it still remains to be seen what they will do as a result of Thursday’s bombings, if anything. Fingers crossed that it’s not much.
States3 days ago
Grassroots Leaders Send Final Warning to GOP Establishment: Rejecting Trump Means Death of Republican Party
White House2 days ago
President Trump Contemplates Ditching the GOP, Starting New ‘Patriot Party’ to Put America First
Tech3 days ago
Free Speech Platform Gab Receives 3 Million New Users in 12 Days
Politics4 days ago
Constituents Already Beginning to Turn on Peter Meijer, Who Admits That Voting to Impeach Trump May Have Ruined His Political Career
Free Speech4 days ago
Tennessee High School Principal Suspended for Speaking Against Big Tech Censorship
Politics2 days ago
ENOUGH ALREADY: QAnon Hucksters Now Claim Biden Will Execute ‘The Plan’
Black Lives Matter4 days ago
Twerking For MLK: Black Lives Matter Posts Gyrating Tribute to Civil Rights Hero
Big League Guns2 days ago
Texas Governor Abbott Wants Texas to Be a “Second Amendment Sanctuary”