Connect with us

Politics

California Man Gets Year in Jail for Bribing the Homeless in Illicit Vote Harvesting Scheme

Eight other people have been charged with this crime.

Published

on

Norman Hall, 62, pleaded guilty last week to participating in an illicit vote harvesting scheme in which homeless people were bribed with cigarettes and money to obtain fraudulent signatures on voter registration forms and ballot referendum petitions.

Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office announced the charges in Nov. 2018, and the scheme reportedly went on during the 2016 and 2018 election cycles in the state of California. Hall and eight others were implicated in the scheme that targeted unsuspecting individuals in Los Angeles’ Skid Row neighborhood.

“This is voter fraud, which we talk about, and we know it exists, but it isn’t exactly something that patrol officers deal with,” LAPD Detective Meghan Aguilar said in May 2017.

Trending: Say His Name, Rowan Sweeney: 4-Year-Old White Boy Murdered in Ohio by Black Thug in Targeted Execution

“Democrats in California continue to pretend voter fraud doesn’t exist,” Matt Fleming, spokesman for the Republican Party of California, said via email. “However, this incident highlights the need for more investigation of claims.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Other defandants who have yet to enter a guilty plea for their alleged crimes include Kirkland Kauzava Washington, 38; Harold Bennett, 53; Louis Thomas Wise, 36; Richard Howard, 62; Rose Makeda Sweeney, 42; Christopher Joseph Williams, 59; Jakara Fati Mardis, 35; and Nickey Demelvin Huntley, 44. Other defendants could face up to six years in jail if they are convicted.

Liberals have largely ignored concerns about ballot harvesting, while conservatives have exposed how the process has helped Democrats exploit the poor and needy to remain in power:

Vote harvesting occurs when third parties — like campaign workers — collect absentee ballots from voters and deliver them to election officials…

The vote-harvesting issue arises in the District of Columbia and the 27 states that allow anyone to pick up an absentee ballot from a voter and deliver it to election officials…

Allowing individuals other than the voter or his immediate family to handle absentee ballots is a recipe for mischief and wrongdoing. Neither voters nor election officials can verify that the secrecy of the ballot was not compromised or that the ballot submitted in the voter’s name by a third party accurately reflects the voter’s choices and was not fraudulently changed by the vote harvester. And there is no guarantee that vote harvesters won’t simply discard the ballots of voters whose political preferences for candidates of the opposition party are known.

It also gives campaign and political party intermediaries the ability to influence voters while they are casting a ballot out of election officials’ sight and without any supervision by them.

Thus, there is no one present to ensure that voters are not being coerced, intimidated, threatened or paid for their vote.

With the high-stakes election coming up in November that will ultimately determine the future of the country, liberals will be using vote harvesting measures and other illicit schemes in order to wrestle power away from the conservative majority.

Congress

Democrat Congressmen Introduce Term Limits Legislation for SCOTUS Justices As Trump Prepares Nominee

Interesting timing.

Published

on

Three Democrat members of Congress are introducing legislation to institute term limits for Supreme Court justices, as President Trump prepares to nominate his third candidate for the court following the death of progressive liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Democrats Joe Kennedy, Ro Khanna, and Don Beyer are proposing legislation that would limit SCOTUS justice to a maximum term of eighteen years on the court.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Khanna has proposed an idea that would allow Presidents to appoint two judges in each term. “Senior” members of the court would be required to basically retired for every new member of the court.

It’s pretty funny the Democrats are uniting behind these proposals the moment they appear primed to lose control of the Supreme Court for a generation. They weren’t complaining when Obama was trying to replace Antonin Scalia with progressive Merrick Garland, even going so far as claiming that the stealth liberal was entitled to the seat. Reports emerging Friday suggest that President Donald Trump intends to nominate Amy Coney Barrett, a mostly conservative judge with a pro-life and immigration hawk judicial record.

The judicial branch of government is arguably the most flawed element of American governance, and it’s highly questionable how institutions such as the Supreme Court are able to appoint themselves a nearly unlimited amount of political power.

A better reform proposals would be to institute term limits for justices that only go into effect after the current members of the court vacate their seats. Anything else is simply a political power grab.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending