The California legislature has made it clear that Christian teachings on sexuality aren’t appreciated in the Golden State, if a June legislative resolution is to be taken seriously.
California Assembly Concurrent Resolution 99 “asks” religious leaders and pastors operating in the state to “embrace the individual and social benefits of family and community acceptance” by repudiating what the legislature calls “conversion therapy.” The Democratic super-majority in the state legislature has attempted to outright ban what they define as conversion therapy before, running into constitutional roadblocks that stopped proposed legislation last year.
The legislative resolution, which settles for merely “asking” religious leaders to drop their objections to homosexuality, appears to be the next best thing that California Democrats are being forced to settle for.
Statewide bans on conversion therapy, which is broadly interpreted by Democrats to entail any religious-based teaching against homosexual practices, have become popular in blue states in recent years. Democrats in New Jersey succeeded where their California peers failed, managing to pass legislation that outright criminalized “conversion therapy” last year. The legislation is facing legal challenges and will very possibly be overturned in the Supreme Court, but the dubious constitutionality of the law doesn’t seem to be stopping Democrats from other states from running with the idea.
California Democrats are only settling with the consolation prize of lecturing Christian pastors on their moral teachings out of necessity. Should they receive the green light needed from progressive judicial activists to outright criminalize religious teachings against homosexuality, it’s unlikely they’ll hesitate for more than a moment before bringing down the hammer on pastors, priests, rabbis and imams.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
HUGE: 5th Circuit Court Affirms Texas Abortion Ban During Coronavirus Pandemic
A big league victory for sanity.
The 5th Circuit Court has issued a decision allowing the state of Texas to ban elective abortions during the coronavirus pandemic, as medical supplies are in high demand to treat victims of the illness.
The panel made the ruling by a 2-1 margin on Tuesday. The majority cited “the escalating spread of COVID-19, and the state’s critical interest in protecting the public health” in making their decision.
Breaking: 5th Circuit rules for Texas in case over coronavirus abortion ban. Judge Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee, cites "the escalating spread of COVID-19, and the state’s critical interest in protecting the public health."
— Emma Platoff (@emmaplatoff) April 7, 2020
Judges Stuart Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee, and Jennifer Elrod, an appointee of George W. Bush, made up the majority while Judge James Dennis, a Clinton appointee, dissented with the ruling.
“That settled rule allows the state to restrict, for example, one’s right to peaceably assemble, to publicly worship, to travel, and even to leave one’s home,” the majority wrote. “The right to abortion is no exception.”
The panel also determined that the lower court erred when they refused to apply the Supreme Court’s test to determine the constitutionality of abortion restrictions. The SCOTUS test pertains to the legal review of weighing the burden on a woman’s access to abortion services against the medical benefits of the restrictions on abortion.
The majority ultimately determined that the lower court “failed to balance (the Texas restriction’s) temporary burdens on abortion against its benefits in thwarting a public health crisis.”
“The bottom line is this: when faced with a society-threatening epidemic, a state may implement emergency measures that curtail constitutional rights so long as the measures have at least some “real or substantial relation” to the public health crisis,” Judge Duncan and Judge Elrod wrote in their majority opinion.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a guidance last month declaring that all abortions “not medically necessary to preserve the life or health” of the woman would be considered a “non-essential” medical service throughout the coronavirus pandemic. Doctors who refuse to comply and murder babies in the womb despite the order are subject to “penalties of up to $1,000 or 180 days of jail time.”
The Democrat on the panel is dismayed with the opinion of the majority and would have preferred to keep the baby-mutilating industry going in Texas while coronavirus poses a serious threat to public safety.
“In a time where panic and fear already consume our daily lives, the majority’s opinion inflicts further panic and fear on women in Texas by depriving them, without justification, of their constitutional rights, exposing them to the risks of continuing an unwanted pregnancy, as well as the risks of travelling to other states in search of time-sensitive medical care,” Dennis wrote.
Because of this ruling, Texas is permitted to make common-sense decisions to conserve medical supplies during an unprecedented crisis.
Trending on BLP
Deep State3 days ago
ACCOUNTABILITY: President Trump Fires Deep State Snitch Who Triggered Impeachment Hysteria
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments
Tech4 days ago
Banished Journalist Laura Loomer’s $1.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tech Giants Will Be Heard in Court
Big League Economics3 days ago
This Wall Street Firm Has Quietly Gained Control Over the Financial Sector During Coronavirus Panic
News2 days ago
GLOBALISM: Bush Foundation Ships 2 Million Masks to China Despite Increasing Shortages in America
Big League Wellness3 days ago
New York Storefronts Boarded Up as Burglaries Rise 75%
News2 days ago
The Wuhan Virus Takes a Bite Out of a Bronx Zoo Tiger
News3 days ago
Ankle Monitors are Now being Used on Louisville, Kentucky Residents Who Contract the Wuhan Virus