Connect with us

News

Child Porn Linked to Leftist Economist’s Personal IP Address

Published

on

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman claimed that his IP address had been “compromised” and used to “download child pornography.”

“Well, I’m on the phone with my computer security service, and as I understand it someone compromised my IP address and is using it to download child pornography,” Krugman tweeted. “I might just be a random target. But this could be an attempt to Qanon me. It’s an ugly world out there.”

Trending: 23-Month-Old Boy Dies After Being Repeatedly Punched in the Face by Attacker in Chicago

Krugman would later delete this tweet.

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

He claimed that “Times thinks it may have been a scam” and that he will make sure to have more security in future.”

QAnon refers to a group of conspiracy theorists who have spread rumors about alleged Deep State plots against President Donald Trump.

Various political observers were skeptical of Krugman’s assertion. Others took the time to make fun of him.

“Ok boomer,” DailyWire’s Jessica Fletcher tweeted.

“The biggest tell that you’re lying is that no one would be motivated to debase you more than you already have,” film producer Adam Trahan wrote.

“Think Mrs. Krugman will buy it?” Grabien founder Tom Elliott asked.

“Paul Krugman, who has publicly admitted to having child pornography downloaded on his computer,” anarchist podcaster Michael Malice commented.

Krugman is an outspoken Trump critic and predicted that there would be a “global recession” after president Donald Trump was elected.

There are still no new developments on this situation.

Some speculate that such activities are common among political elites.

In his book, The Bitcoin Standard, economist Saifedean Ammous criticized economist John Maynard Keynes’ economic theories, while also exposing the social implications of Keynes’ policy proposals. Ammous particularly criticized the breakdown of the family unit that interventionist systems of governance tend to cause.

Ammous explained that state growth is detrimental to the traditional family structure:

Substituting the family with government largesse has arguably been a losing trade for individuals who have partaken in it. Several studies show that life satisfaction depends to a large degree on establishing intimate long-term familial bonds with a partner and children. Many studies also show that rates of depression and psychological diseases are rising over time as the family breaks down, particularly for women. Cases of depression and psychological disorders very frequently have family breakdown as a leading cause.

The economist then revealed a shocking aspect about Keynes’ life:

It is no coincidence that the breakdown of the family has come about through the implementation of the economic teachings of a man who never had any interest in the long term. A son of a rich family that had accumulated significant capital over generations, Keynes was a libertine hedonist who wasted most his adult life engaging in sexual relationships with children, including traveling around the Mediterranean to visit children’s brothels.

Keynes is a source of inspiration for Krugman’s economic beliefs.

If foul play is discovered in Krugman’s case, it would fall right in line with the degeneracy that American political elites and the pundit class have been rumored to partake in during the past few decades.

News

As the U.S. Elections Approaches, Thousands of Immigrants are Gaining U.S. Citizenship

Published

on

America’s foreign voter base continues to grow ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

John Binder of Breitbart News noted that this is “adding a bloc of first-time foreign-born voters to the electorate.”

The last few months has seen delays in naturalization ceremonies thanks to the Wuhan virus pandemic. As of June, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) agency restarted ceremonies, with 2,000 immigrants being naturalized according to a report published by Camila DeChalus on June 10.

Other immigrants, who were expected to receive citizenship in 2020, are now pressing legal action against the federal government.

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Prior to the crisis, USICS was naturalizing immigrants to the tune of 60,000 monthly.

Binder broke down the overall legal migration numbers:

Legal immigration levels — where 1.2 million immigrants secure Green Cards and nearly a million obtain naturalized citizenship annually — has driven up the nation’s foreign-born voting population to record levels.

The Breitbart writer highlighted another demographic trend that is taking place across America:

In February, Pew Research Center revealed that for the first time since 1970, one-in-ten U.S. voters will have been born outside the country in the 2020 election. High legal immigration levels have also ensured that Hispanic voters will replace black Americans as the largest voting minority for the first time in U.S. history.

According to research from The Atlantic, the New York Times, and Axios, Democrats tend to benefit from an increased foreign-born population.

Binder gave an overview about what these foreign voter numbers look like:

The Atlantic‘s Ronald Brownstein reveals nearly 90 percent of House congressional districts with a foreign-born population above the national average are won by Democrats. This means every congressional district with a foreign-born population exceeding 14 percent has a 90 percent chance of electing Democrats and only a ten percent chance of electing a Republican.

Exit polling data indicated that Trump won 49 percent of native-born Americans’ votes, whereas Clinton won 45 percent of the vote. As far as foreign voters were concerned, Clinton trounced Trump by raking in 64 percent of the immigrant vote, while Trump got only 31 percent.

At the moment, the Binder points out that the “U.S. is on track to import about 15 million new foreign-born voters in the next two decades due to existing legal immigration levels.”

Binder continued:

Those 15 million new foreign-born voters include about eight million who will arrive through chain migration, where newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.

The U.S. is undergoing a massive demographic transformation thanks to public policy.

In previous eras, migration waves would at least be contained by legislative pauses that allowed for assimilation.

But now, elites are content by keeping the illegal and legal migration gravy train going without any pause in sight.

Given immigrant voting trends, many freedoms such as the right to bear arms and free speech could be in jeopardy thanks to Democrats gaining a new voting bloc that will help them stay in power for a long time.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending