News
Child Porn Linked to Leftist Economist’s Personal IP Address
New York Times columnist Paul Krugman claimed that his IP address had been “compromised” and used to “download child pornography.”
“Well, I’m on the phone with my computer security service, and as I understand it someone compromised my IP address and is using it to download child pornography,” Krugman tweeted. “I might just be a random target. But this could be an attempt to Qanon me. It’s an ugly world out there.”

Trending: Arizona House Passes Law to Nullify Biden’s Federal Gun Control
Krugman would later delete this tweet.
He claimed that “Times thinks it may have been a scam” and that he will make sure to have more security in future.”
QAnon refers to a group of conspiracy theorists who have spread rumors about alleged Deep State plots against President Donald Trump.
Various political observers were skeptical of Krugman’s assertion. Others took the time to make fun of him.
“Ok boomer,” DailyWire’s Jessica Fletcher tweeted.
Ok boomer.
— Jessica Fletcher (@heckyessica) January 8, 2020
“The biggest tell that you’re lying is that no one would be motivated to debase you more than you already have,” film producer Adam Trahan wrote.
The biggest tell that you’re lying is that no one would be motivated to debase you more than you already have
— Adam Trahan (@AdamTrahan) January 8, 2020
“Think Mrs. Krugman will buy it?” Grabien founder Tom Elliott asked.
Think Mrs. Krugman will buy it?
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 8, 2020
“Paul Krugman, who has publicly admitted to having child pornography downloaded on his computer,” anarchist podcaster Michael Malice commented.
Paul Krugman, who has publicly admitted to having child pornography downloaded on his computer,
— Michael Malice (@michaelmalice) January 8, 2020
Krugman is an outspoken Trump critic and predicted that there would be a “global recession” after president Donald Trump was elected.
There are still no new developments on this situation.
Some speculate that such activities are common among political elites.
In his book, The Bitcoin Standard, economist Saifedean Ammous criticized economist John Maynard Keynes’ economic theories, while also exposing the social implications of Keynes’ policy proposals. Ammous particularly criticized the breakdown of the family unit that interventionist systems of governance tend to cause.
Ammous explained that state growth is detrimental to the traditional family structure:
Substituting the family with government largesse has arguably been a losing trade for individuals who have partaken in it. Several studies show that life satisfaction depends to a large degree on establishing intimate long-term familial bonds with a partner and children. Many studies also show that rates of depression and psychological diseases are rising over time as the family breaks down, particularly for women. Cases of depression and psychological disorders very frequently have family breakdown as a leading cause.
The economist then revealed a shocking aspect about Keynes’ life:
It is no coincidence that the breakdown of the family has come about through the implementation of the economic teachings of a man who never had any interest in the long term. A son of a rich family that had accumulated significant capital over generations, Keynes was a libertine hedonist who wasted most his adult life engaging in sexual relationships with children, including traveling around the Mediterranean to visit children’s brothels.
Keynes is a source of inspiration for Krugman’s economic beliefs.
If foul play is discovered in Krugman’s case, it would fall right in line with the degeneracy that American political elites and the pundit class have been rumored to partake in during the past few decades.
Immigration
Mara Elvira Salazar is No Friend of America First Nationalism
Republican leaders would be wise to ignore all of her political advice.
If there’s one Republican leader that young activists should never listen to, it’s Florida Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar.
Salazar, who is a Cuban American, has been an outspoken advocate of loosening U.S. immigration laws. In fact, she even confronted known immigration hawk and key Trump adviser Stephen Miller at a Republican Study Committee weekly lunch on February 24, 2021. She specifically criticized Trump’s immigration message and demanded that the GOP be more inclusive in its outreach.
“I told him [Miller] that the GOP needs to attract the browns,” stated Salazar. “We, for the last 30 years since Ronald Reagan, have not sent the right message to the browns,” she continued. “Reagan was the last guy who gave a path to citizenship to 3 million people … 35 years ago. It’s time for us to do the same thing that Reagan did.”
Salazar doubled down on her pro-immigration message when she went on Larry Kudlow’s show on March 2 and declared that former President Donald Trump would have done better with Hispanics by advocating for looser immigration. Journalist Ryan Girdusky noted how some of Trump’s advisers were already pushing for amnesty lite policies:
.@RepMariaSalazar went on Larry Kudlow’s show and said Trump would have done better with Hispanics if he had John McCain’s position on immigration. Incredibly stupid
take our poll - story continues belowCompleting this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) March 2, 2021
She said Trump's fault was he didn't offer full legality towards all 20 million illegal aliens and increase legal immigration.
Larry then noted that he, Jared, and Brooke Rollins were working on a plan like that (something Jared's people denied)
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) March 2, 2021
Girdusky added that Salazar was rather unhinged in her criticism of Miller’s vision for the GOP:
Throughout her anger filled rant, which was full of inaccuracies, she repeatedly took jabs at Stephen Miller who addressed the @RepublicanStudy last week, during which she was totally unhinged, came into the meeting and started screaming at him. She's not even a member of RSC
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) March 2, 2021
Salazar made a lot of noise about the Hispanic vote, despite ignoring how Trump improved his Hispanic numbers between 2016 and his re-election bid in 2020 from 28% to 32%. And he did so without much Hispandering or campaigning on passing amnesty.
The unsavory fact that the GOP consultant class and the likes of Salazar refuse to acknowledge is that the Black Lives Matter unrest alone likely pushed significant segments of the Hispanic population into the Democrats’ arms. BLM radicalism alienated Americans of all backgrounds., but Hispanics were not having any of this kind of ruckus. Even Hispanic Democrats, of all groups, largely supported strong military action during the riots.
In reality, Hispanic support for Trump is largely based on his bluster and political bluntness, which many minority groups find comfort in.
However, Republicans like Salazar gets it all wrong by thinking that expanding immigration both legal and illegal is a key to the Republican Party success. The Republican Party will have to concede that they can make gains with Hispanics at the margins but they cannot expect to win the majority of the Hispanic vote due to Hispanics’ propensity to support many causes ranging from gun control to more government involvement in healthcare. Data from the Pew Research Center demonstrates these beliefs among Hispanics. Nevertheless, there are some avenues for outreach with this demographic but they must be done right.
The key for Republican success is the white working class voters, which played a crucial role in putting Trump over the top in the Midwest back in 2016. These voters are not the most reliable in terms of turnout, but they comprise a vast segment of the American electorate. Any candidate who can activate them could potentially build a hegemonic electoral coalition for years to come. The goal for a sane Republican campaign is to maximize turnout and support among the WWC.
Such inroads with WWC voters are more important than meeting a diversity quota the likes of Salazar and naive Republican strategists would like the party to pursue. Any nationalist campaign worth its salt would be promoting the following: Infrastructure projects targeting the Midwest, the restriction of both illegal and legal immigration, and re-shoring programs to bring jobs back.
On the other hand, following Salazar’s program is the way that the GOP will become irrelevant and alienate many WWC voters who are already on the fence with regards to the Republican Party. These voters are not going to gravitate towards Republicans just because of the “R” next to their name. They still must be catered to and pushing for amnesty is one way to turn working class voters off.
Under Salazar’s watch, the GOP will simply be going back to the politically correct ways of the Bush administration. To tap into the sleeping giants that is the WWC, Republican leaders should ignore everything Salazar has to say and get fully behind nationalist policies such as immigration restriction, infrastructure development, and re-shoring.
-
Congress4 days agoREJECTED: Marjorie Taylor Greene Stops Cori Bush’s Amendment to Allow Violent Convicted Felons to Vote
-
Congress4 days agoDeranged Democrat Demands Prosecution of 40,000 Trump Supporters Who Were OUTSIDE Capitol
-
Around The World2 days ago36-Year-Old Woman ‘is Gang Raped’ by Migrants ‘After Stopping to Talk to Them about Their Situation’
-
Two Americas3 days agoPOLITICAL HIT? Pro-Trump Portland, Oregon Print Shop Owner Gunned Down in Parking Lot
-
Big League Guns2 days agoArizona House Passes Law to Nullify Biden’s Federal Gun Control
-
Culture4 days agoGRENELL’S GAL: Meet the Future of the Pro-LGBT “Conservative” Movement
-
States4 days agoTexas Governor Greg Abbott Ends Statewide Mask Mandate: “It’s Time to Open Texas 100%”
-
Congress2 days agoMitch McConnell Preparing Exit Strategies, Potential Successors in Advance of Possible Retirement

