CLOWN COURT: SCOTUS Justices Spew Utter Nonsense During Vaccine Mandate Hearing
Shane Trejo
|
The robed lawyers on the Supreme Court have been embarrassing themselves all day while hearing the oral arguments of crucial case on vaccine mandates.
The case will determine whether or not the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has overstepped its authority in implementing a vaccine mandate on private businesses with over 100 workers. While it should be obvious that this mandate is outrageously unconstitutional, the brain trust on SCOTUS does not necessarily see it that way.
The most insanely idiotic comments come from the “wise Latina” Sonia Sotomayor, the far-left Obama affirmative action appointee to the bench:
Justice Robert Breyer’s comments were not far behind those of Sotomayor in terms of tone-deaf stupidity:
Trump’s SCOTUS pick, Amy Coney Barrett, showed her lack of willingness to protect the Constitutional rights of the people during the proceedings as well:
However, there was some sanity from the more conservative justices serving on the bench, such as the civil libertarian Neil Gorsuch:
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas similarly made some arguments poking holes in the supposed necessity of a federal vaccine mandate as well:
Big League Politics has reported on how this gaggle of unelected attorneys regularly sells out the rights of the American people to protect the system that handed them such gilded prestigious positions:
“The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has opened the door for public schools to adopt transgender insanity on a grand scale by denying a crucial case that would have protected children from this psychotic agenda.
On Monday, SCOTUS rejected Gloucester County School Board v. Grimm, and legal analyst Margot Cleveland explained that this will allow public schools to aggressively implement the promotion of transgenderism as official policy.
Cleveland wrote in her analysis for The Federalist that SCOTUS ruled in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC (2020) by a 6-3 margin that transgender discrimination is illegal under Title IX law. However, SCOTUS essentially punted in this ruling on defining what exactly constitutes transgender discrimination. Grimm could have provided the court with the opportunity to establish a framework that would keep LGBT predators at bay.
She wrote that “while the Supreme Court may see no urgency in the resolving the legal questions at issue, while the justices sit on the sidelines, the privacy rights of children (and adults) are at risk, as are parental rights, the right to free exercise of religion, and the right to free speech—which also includes the right not to be compelled to speak, even when the forced speech concerns pronouns.”
It was only Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas that wanted to hear Harris Funeral Homes. The rest of the justices, including Trump picks Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, voted to punt on the issue and enable transgenders to target school children.“
There is nothing supreme about this court. They have looked the other way throughout America’s transformation from a constitutional republic into a socialist despotism. A betrayal on the brazenly illegal OSHA mandates would be arguably the court’s most egregious disgrace to date.
Share: