Connect with us

States

Colorado Secretary of State Took Orders From Planned Parenthood to Orchestrate Alabama Boycott

The Democrats literally take their marching orders from the pro-abortion front.

Published

on

A recently-released report has shown that the Colorado secretary of state took orders from Planned Parenthood before she announced her state’s sanctions against Alabama for taking a pro-life stand.

Secretary of State Jena Griswold (D-CO) announced on Thursday that she would restrict travel of employees to Alabama because of their new law banning abortions in most situations. She took her marching orders from Planned Parenthood beforehand, according to a 9News report.

In her declaration, Griswald said the Colorado Election Center should relocate their training away from Alabama. Planned Parenthood told Griswald to alter her declaration to exclude a statement from her speech that all relevant training was available in Denver, in order to make the ban seem more dramatic for the cameras.

Trending: Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments

Griswald also heeded advice based on Planned Parenthood’s polling data to remove language about choice from her speech. This indicates that the pro-abortion movement is no longer about choice, but rather forcing society to deal with the abortion-on-demand agenda and its cultural impacts.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“We don’t recommend using right to choose/pro-life/pro-choice language anymore,” Planned Parenthood told Griswold, adding that choice language “turns folks off.”

Planned Parenthood have been the loudest opponents to Alabama’s anti-abortion measure, HB 314. They claim the legislation, now signed into law, “would be a death sentence for women across this state.” They are expected to challenge the law in the courts, who they anticipate will be in their corner to overturn the ban against the will of the people.

“Governor Ivey, we will see you in court. We’ve never lost a case that we fought in Alabama, so the good news is probably that these laws won’t take effect,” boasted Staci Fox, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Southeast.

Yellow Hammer News noted the failure of Planned Parenthood in recent years in Alabama. They spent $1.5 million in an attempt to defeat Amendment Two, a measure to put pro-life language into the state constitution, in Nov. 2018. It still passed easily despite their opposition.

Nevertheless, Planned Parenthood remains on the march attempting to build a new clinic in Birmingham despite heavy protests. As more states pass similar abortion bans, the issue has never been more contentious across the country.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

States

HUGE: 5th Circuit Court Affirms Texas Abortion Ban During Coronavirus Pandemic

A big league victory for sanity.

Published

on

The 5th Circuit Court has issued a decision allowing the state of Texas to ban elective abortions during the coronavirus pandemic, as medical supplies are in high demand to treat victims of the illness.

The panel made the ruling by a 2-1 margin on Tuesday. The majority cited “the escalating spread of COVID-19, and the state’s critical interest in protecting the public health” in making their decision.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Judges Stuart Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee, and Jennifer Elrod, an appointee of George W. Bush, made up the majority while Judge James Dennis, a Clinton appointee, dissented with the ruling.

“That settled rule allows the state to restrict, for example, one’s right to peaceably assemble, to publicly worship, to travel, and even to leave one’s home,” the majority wrote. “The right to abortion is no exception.”

The panel also determined that the lower court erred when they refused to apply the Supreme Court’s test to determine the constitutionality of abortion restrictions. The SCOTUS test pertains to the legal review of weighing the burden on a woman’s access to abortion services against the medical benefits of the restrictions on abortion.

The majority ultimately determined that the lower court “failed to balance (the Texas restriction’s) temporary burdens on abortion against its benefits in thwarting a public health crisis.”

“The bottom line is this: when faced with a society-threatening epidemic, a state may implement emergency measures that curtail constitutional rights so long as the measures have at least some “real or substantial relation” to the public health crisis,” Judge Duncan and Judge Elrod wrote in their majority opinion.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a guidance last month declaring that all abortions “not medically necessary to preserve the life or health” of the woman would be considered a “non-essential” medical service throughout the coronavirus pandemic. Doctors who refuse to comply and murder babies in the womb despite the order are subject to “penalties of up to $1,000 or 180 days of jail time.”

The Democrat on the panel is dismayed with the opinion of the majority and would have preferred to keep the baby-mutilating industry going in Texas while coronavirus poses a serious threat to public safety.

“In a time where panic and fear already consume our daily lives, the majority’s opinion inflicts further panic and fear on women in Texas by depriving them, without justification, of their constitutional rights, exposing them to the risks of continuing an unwanted pregnancy, as well as the risks of travelling to other states in search of time-sensitive medical care,” Dennis wrote.

Because of this ruling, Texas is permitted to make common-sense decisions to conserve medical supplies during an unprecedented crisis.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending