Connect with us

Big League National Security

COMEY TESTIMONY Reveals Hillary and Obama Overseas Emails On Obamacare Decision



Hillary Clinton was in Russia on the exact date that Obamacare was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2012, according to photographic evidence.

The Supreme Court upheld the health care law known as the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, on June 28, 2012.

Now, James Comey has testified that Hillary Clinton and Obama exchanged emails while she was “overseas” and they talked about a court decision regarding the Affordable Care Act. (HOWLEY: Brennan and Clapper Must Answer For Hacking John Roberts).

Trending: SHOCK: Convicted Child Rapist Arrested for Baton Attack at Washington ANTIFA Protest

So, were Hillary and Obama talking about the Supreme Court case while she was in Russia, and then those emails showed up in a June 28, 2016 74-page email that was sent by Peter Strzok to another FBI lieutenant working under James Comey?

take our poll - story continues below

RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Oh yeah, it just so happens that Peter Strzok’s June 28 email was sent ONE DAY AFTER LORETTA LYNCH MET WITH BILL CLINTON ON THE TARMAC ON JUNE 27, 2016.

As in, Peter Strzok panicking about what happened in those emails, when Hillary was talking to Obama.

Here is the relevant Comey testimony:

“Mr. Ratcliffe. Director, I have handed to you an email dated June 28, 2016. Would you confirm for me that it appears to be an 74 email that was sent from Peter Strzok to your chief of staff Jim Rybicki?

Mr. Comey. I can’t tell from this,

Mr. Ratcliffe. I see email addresses; first looks like PP Strzok and then JE Rybicki.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Okay. Do you recognize those as being FBI email addresses for Peter Strzok and your chief of staff, Jim Rybicki?

Mr. Comey. I actually don’t. I mean, I’m not trying to dispute that they are; I just don’t remember that particular formulation of our email addresses.

Mr. Ratcliffe. But you don’t have any reason to doubt if the Department produced these in the context of our investigation, that they are —

Mr. Comey. No, no.

Mr. Ratcliffe. — that it is an email exchange between Peter Strzok and Jim Rybicki?

Mr. Comey. I accept that.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Okay. And you see on there that it is time dated June the 28th of 2016 on the far left-hand side?

Mr. Comey. Yeah. I see that.

Mr. Ratcliffe. All right. I’m going to read the content for the record. It says: Jim, I have the POTUS, hyphen, HRC emails D requested — that’s the letter D — requested at the end of briefing yesterday. I hesitate to leave them. Please let me know a convenient time to drop them off. 75 Did I read that accurately?

Mr. Comey. You did.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Okay. Do you know whether or not POTUS-HRC would be reference to the President of the United States and Hillary Rodham Clinton?

Mr. Comey. It seems so to me.

Mr. Ratcliffe. All right. Do you recall there being a briefing — well, first of all, there’s a reference to a letter D, “that D requested.” In other emails, it appears that sometimes you were referred to as the Director by the letter D. Do you recall that?

Mr. Comey. Yes, I have seen that before. I think that’s 76

Mr. Comey. I remember for sure being aware that there were communications between them and sort of the general substance of it is. I have some vague recollection of having seen them myself. I’m not certain of that, though, but I was aware that there were communications between the two of them.

Mr. Ratcliffe. So, as you sit here today, you don’t recall — or let me ask it this way: Do you recall anything about the content of the emails between President Obama and Hillary Clinton that are referenced in this?

Mr. Comey. Yes, I have some — I have some recollection. I’m probably going to screw this up, but I can remember I think her sending him some congratulations on something, a speech or — oh, I know what it was actually, that she sent him a congratulations that I think was tied to a court decision I think on the Affordable Care Act and that she was overseas somewhere and sent him a congrats or something to that effect.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Okay.

Mr. Comey. That’s all the — maybe others will come back to me, but I remember that in particular.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Do you have any recollection about how many emails there were?

Mr. Comey. I don’t. My general sense is there weren’t a lot, but there were some, but, again, I’m not certain of that.

Mr. Ratcliffe. So the email here that we’re reviewing makes a reference to the briefing yesterday. The email is dated 77 June 28th, meaning the briefing was June the 27th of 2016, if this is accurate. The significance of that is, as we talked about last time, June 27th of 2016 was also the date that Attorney General Lynch and former President Bill Clinton met on a tarmac in Phoenix, Arizona. Do you recall whether or not this briefing was held at the FBI because of that tarmac meeting, or was it just happened to be a coincidence that it was held on that day? Mr. Comey. It would have to have been a coincidence. I don’t remember a meeting in response to the tarmac meeting.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Do you know as you sit here those emails between President Obama and Secretary Clinton, whether or not they contained any classified information?

Mr. Comey. My recollection is that they did not. They did not is my recollection. The concern was at least one of them was sent from overseas. Actually, I have some recollection one was sent from [ ] while the Secretary of State was visiting, and the concern we had was about the exposure of his unclassified email account, which was not in his name.

Mr. Ratcliffe. So, if your recollection is that they may not have contained classified information, do you know why the FBI or the Department of Justice would not have produced them to Congress in response to our request for them?

Mr. Comey. I don’t.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Okay. So, but to be clear, did these emails that you reviewed, do they reflect that Hillary Rodham Clinton and 78 President Obama were communicating via email through an unsecure, unclassified server?

Mr. Comey. Yes, they were between her Clinton account and his — I don’t know where his account, his unclassified account, was maintained. So I’m sorry. So, yes, there were communications unclassified between two accounts, hers and then his cover account.

Mr. Ratcliffe. Yes. And by “cover account” are you referring to the fact that President Obama emailed Secretary Clinton using a pseudonym?”

Big League National Security

Petition for Seattle Mayor’s Recall Election Approved by King County Judge

The mayor stood by as anarchists seceded from the United States.



A petition campaign to bring about a recall election targeting Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan was approved by a King County Judge on Sunday, potentially setting up Durkan’s removal from office. The liberal mayor has lost the confidence of many of the city’s residents, including liberals, after largely refusing to enforce the rule of law and the territorial integrity of the United States.

Durkan consistently refused to break up the dangerous Capital Hill Autonomous Zone anarchist territory after its adherents declared their independence from the United States, responding to the presence of the rebel group with little more than smug potshots at President Donald Trump. Durkan only finally broke up the CHAZ after multiple murders within the commune’s borders, senseless killings by the territory’s armed ‘security’ that could’ve been avoided through putting down the secessionist project.

However, it appears that the recall petition actually opposes Durkan for opposing the activities of the CHAZ, claiming that Durkan was restricting protected political activity within the confines of the commune. The petition accuses Durkan of “endanger(ing) the peace and safety of the community” by allowing the police to “leak false information about fabricated crimes and threats to the media.” The recall also cites a curfew implemented upon the City of Seattle after the anarchists set up their autonomous commune.

Petitioners will need to collect 50,000 signatures in order to bring about the recall election, which is relatively unprecedented in the history of Seattle. It’s quite likely that a sizable population of Seattle residents opposed to the lawless and violent activities of the anarchists will support the recall, an irony considering that its organizers oppose the mayor for refusing to grant the street criminals special privileges.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!