Connect with us

The Swamp

CONFIRMED: Obama DOJ Told FBI Not to Charge Hillary in Email Scandal

Surprising absolutely no one.

Published

on

Disgraced former FBI agent Lisa Page sang like a canary when questioned under oath last summer, according to the the social media account of one of the members of the House Judiciary Committee who took part in her hearing before Congress.

“Lisa Page confirmed to me under oath that the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information,” said Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) on Twitter, attaching a transcript of the hearing.

Trending: CDC Admits There is No Proof COVID-19 is Airborne Virus and They Have Been Misleading the Public All Along

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory,” the transcript said. “But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —”

Page interrupted him and said “That is correct.”

Page first gained public prominence when it came to light in late 2017 that she and her former FBI agent lover Peter Strzok had exchanged numerous anti-Trump text messages, which discussed dubious “insurance policies” and expressed their desires to stop Trump from becoming president. Both were part of the FBI’s counterintelligence team in the bogus “Russian collusion” hoax.

House Judiciary Committee Republicans made the hearing transcripts public for the first time yesterday, confirming the suspicions of those who have followed the Clinton email scandal and “Russian collusion” stories – the Justice Department under President Barack H. Obama made sure that then-candidate Hillary Clinton was not charged for obvious mishandling of classified information.

Such a charge would have been devastating to her doomed campaign, and dangerous to Obama’s cronies who were spying on the Trump campaign with warrants obtained from secret FISA courts based on the still-unconfirmed information contained in the bogus and salacious Steele Dossier, created by Fusion GPS, an opposition research campaign in the employ of the Clinton campaign.

Simply put, Obama was spying on Trump without cause, and did not want to risk causing Clinton the election with a prosecution.

Since Clinton lost anyway, the “Russian collusion” scheme is being exposed for what it is – not a legitimate investigation into any crime, but a coverup of the extralegal activities of the Obama administration that was desperate to prevent a Trump presidency.


Follow Peter D’Abrosca on Twitter: @pdabrosca

Like Peter D’Abrosca on Facebook: facebook.com/peterdabrosca

Preorder Peter D’Abrosca’s Book: Enemies: The Press vs. The American People”

The Swamp

Source: John Durham Indictments, Report Not Expected Before the Election

Looks like a letdown.

Published

on

Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business reported on Sunday morning that the Department of Justice is not expecting US Attorney John Durham to file any indictments or release a public report on his investigation regarding governmental misconduct in the 2016 election before the November election.

Durham was tasked by William Barr to investigate FBI misconduct and fraudulent claims with the federal bureaucracy that then-candidate Trump was under the control of Russia. He’s already indicted one former FBI lawyer- who went on to work for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s witch hunt into the Russia conspiracy- for falsifying documents in order to obtain a surveillance warrant on Carter Page, a then-Trump campaign foreign policy advisor.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

However, it appears his probe is primed to become somewhat of a flop. Bartiromo has reported that sources within the DOJ are icing any action in the form of new indictments or reports documenting governmental corruption before the election occurs. It’s still possible Durham could indict other deep state-linked bureaucrats, but some have questioned whether he intends to indict anyone else at all.

Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton had previously questioned the seriousness of Durham’s probe, asking why he had not convened any grand juries and pointing out that the Connecticut district attorney has largely failed to produce any concrete investigative results in sixteen months since being appointed by Barr to investigate the Russiagate hoax.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending