Connect with us

Violent Left

Congressmen move to unmask Antifa with Civil Rights protections



Reps. Dan Donovan and King of New York, Ted Budd of North Carolina and  Paul Gosar of Arizona, introduced a Congressional bill in June, which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

“My bill expands upon long-standing civil rights statutes to make it a crime to deprive someone of Constitutionally-guaranteed protections while masked or disguised. Americans have the natural right to speak and protest freely; it is not a right to throw Molotov cocktails and beat people while hiding behind a mask,” said Congressman Donovan.

“The bill adds a penalty for wearing a mask while committing crimes that have been against federal law for decades,” Donovan’s office told Big League Politics.

The bill text itself also makes it clear that the simple act of wearing a mask doesn’t trigger a potential heightened criminal prison sentence.

The bill reads:  whoever “while in disguise, including wearing a mask, injures, oppresses, threatens or intimidates any person…in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured him by the Constitution…

The “injuries, oppresses, threatens or intimidates” language comes directly from existing federal civil rights statutes dating from 1948.


Trending: WOW: Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Caught LYING UNDER OATH about Censorship in Senate Testimony

“To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalty enhancements for committing certain offenses while in disguise, and for other purposes,” according to the text of the Bill.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Full Text of H.R. 6054


Donovan’s office provided Big League Politics  with the following information:


 “People put on the masks so that we can all become anonymous, right? And then, therefore, we are able to move more freely and do what we need to do, whether it is illegal or not,” he said. (Scott Crow, part of antifa movement, to CNN)

  • The Unmasking Antifa Act makes it a crime to interfere with protected rights while in disguise.

o   Antifa and other groups have used masks to hide their identities while trying to prevent a person from exercising his/her Constitutionally-protected rights.

o   The bill applies to any and all groups that deprive people from exercising their Constitutionally-protected rights.

o   Some States, including Louisiana, New York, and Minnesota, have some form of the statute that either enhances penalties for those that commit a crime while wearing a mask or bans the wearing of a disguise in public.

o   The bill does not impose a mandatory minimum. It increases the maximum penalty from 10 years to 15 years if crimes covered in existing civil rights statutes are committed under cover of mask or disguise.

  • The language in the bill mirrors federal civil rights statutes (Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241), which prohibit “two or more persons [from conspiring] to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution…”

o   According to the Department of Justice, the “offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty.”

  • Recent violent acts by masked protestors reinforce the need for this bill:

o   February 2017, Berkeley: “Black-clad protesters wearing masks threw Molotov cocktails and smashed windows at the student union center where the Yiannopoulos event was to be held.”

o   June 2017, Portland Oregon: police detained a group of masked Antifa activists and seized a “large number of weapons”

o   June 2017, Sacramento: 7 were stabbed in the clash between white supremacists and counter-protestors. “Many of the counter-protesters wore masks, making them difficult to identify on video by law enforcement.”

o   August 2017, Berkeley: “Some anti-fascist protesters, wearing black and with their faces covered, chased or beat Trump supporters and organizers who had scheduled and then canceled the ‘anti-Marxist’ rally, citing concerns over safety.”

  • August 2017, Berkeley: video of four masked protestors kicking, punching, and beating with a stick a man lying on the ground trying to shield himself from the attack.
  • August 2017, Berkeley: video of masked mob chasing and beating a victim in the street.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center:

“At least 18 states have “anti-masking” laws that make it a crime to wear a mask in public. Most of the laws were passed between the 1920s and the 1950s, in reaction to waves of violence perpetrated by the Klan.

Public officials argued that the laws were needed to protect the public from Klan intimidation and violence and that banning masks would aid law enforcement in identifying criminals,” they wrote.

“Over the past few years, there have been multiple events that show the need for this legislation. The Constitution was written to protect our rights – one of those being the right to free speech. Violent protesters who hide behind their masks and deprive others of their protected rights should be prosecuted, and that’s exactly what this bill would do,” said Ted Budd, member of the House Freedom Caucus,  told Big League Politics.

What is good enough for the KKK is good enough for Antifa.

Violent Left

FACT CHECK: BLM Rioter Accused of Firing Into Minneapolis Police Station HAS NO CONNECTION to President Trump or Right-Wingers

The fake news is lying again.



A Black Lives Matter/ANTIFA rioter who allegedly fired into a police station during the Minneapolis riots is NOT a right-wing supporter of President Donald Trump, as it is being implied by the fake news media and Democrat liars.

The fake news is circulating this claim on social media, with Big Tech entities doing nothing to stop the spread of this blatant disinformation:

However, there is no proof that the individual accused of shooting at the police precinct – Ivan Harrison Hunter of Boerne, Tx – is right-wing in the slightest. Hunter reportedly yelled, “Justice for Floyd!”, and bragged about how he “set fire to that precinct with the black community” after the fact.

Members of the anarchist “Boogaloo Boys” collective that Hunter is supposedly affiliated with have voiced their concerns with President Donald Trump and espoused left-wing views that echo ANTIFA rather than any right-wing group.

Big League Politics has reported on the left-wing ideology behind the Boogaloo Boys, who have voiced their support for BLM/ANTIFA terrorism and regularly joined in their revolutionary action against law enforcement:

Earlier today, Big League Politics reported on an FBI operation to stage a phony siege against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in which the individuals set up were reportedly going to kidnap her or perform a citizens’ arrest on Whitmer for her many crimes against humanity.

While it was revealed that a confidential informant was paid thousands of dollars to set up the dubious sting operation, the individuals involved in the plot are not even Republicans despite what many liberal commenters are saying in the fake news or on social media. Their own words indicate that they are anarchists who are adherents to the “Boogaloo Boy” meme that has taken off in recent months…

The Intercept has reported on how the FBI has used these tactics for many years, targeting hapless dupes in order to claim to the unsuspecting public that they are vanquishing terrorism when it’s all really just a sham to justify their massive budgets:

The FBI and major media outlets yesterday trumpeted the agency’s latest counterterrorism triumph: the arrest of three Brooklyn men, ages 19 to 30, on charges of conspiring to travel to Syria to fight for ISIS (photo of joint FBI/NYPD press conference, above). As my colleague Murtaza Hussain ably documents, “it appears that none of the three men was in any condition to travel or support the Islamic State, without help from the FBI informant.” One of the frightening terrorist villains told the FBI informant that, beyond having no money, he had encountered a significant problem in following through on the FBI’s plot: his mom had taken away his passport. Noting the bizarre and unhinged ranting of one of the suspects, Hussain noted on Twitter that this case “sounds like another victory for the FBI over the mentally ill.”

In this regard, this latest arrest appears to be quite similar to the overwhelming majority of terrorism arrests the FBI has proudly touted over the last decade…

For reasons I and many others have repeatedly argued, these cases are unjust in the extreme: a form of pre-emptory prosecution where vulnerable individuals are targeted and manipulated not for any criminal acts they have committed but rather for the bad political views they have expressed. They end up sending young people to prison for decades for “crimes” which even their sentencing judges acknowledge they never would have seriously considered, let alone committed, in the absence of FBI trickery.

The FBI needs to be disbanded, and its operatives brought to justice swiftly and publicly, before America can ever be great again.

After realizing that Americans don’t want to see their cities destroyed by savages, the fake news, with their partners in the Democrat Party and the deep state, are attempting to spin a revisionist narrative that it is actually right-wingers, not left-wing insurrectionists, who have launched the nationwide orgy of violence against the rule of law. It is hard to imagine that any American, aside from brain-addled liberal cowards, could possibly believe this nonsense.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!