Connect with us

Tech

CORPORATE TYRANNY: Mailchimp Bans Molyneux After Complaint From Leftist Doxxing Activist

Big Tech is creating a digital gulag for conservatives.

Published

on

Mailchimp has banned libertarian pro-Trump philosopher Stefan Molyneux from using their email platform after a leftist activist issued a complaint on social media.

Nandini Jammi of Sleeping Giants, a left-wing collective that incites digital lynch mobs to destroy the lives of conservatives, made the complaint to Mailchimp in a Twitter post on Monday. A day later, Mailchimp terminated the account at her behest.

Trending: Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò Pens Open Letter to Donald Trump Explaining the Globalist “Great Reset” to “Subdue Humanity”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Molyneux fired back in a Twitter post against the dishonest claims made by Jammi regarding his views:

Sleeping Giants are an organization on the forefront of a left-wing movement to foment commercial terrorism meant to create a digital gulag. They mobilize jackals on social media to hurl threats and spread false information in order to destroy a political opponent’s life, with the intention of making it impossible for dissidents to make a living and feed their families.

Organizations like Sleeping Giants are private enforcers of the Orwellian nightmare, and have emerged as a far bigger threat to the Bill of Rights and Constitution than any government agency.

Free speech advocate Jim Watkins, who owned 8chan before it was blacklisted from the internet, described what happens when commercial terrorist organizations like Sleeping Giants collude with the elite media and Silicon Valley to metaphorically gangrape an individual’s core freedoms.

Watkins explained: “I’ve received threats from big public companies. It’s like commercial terrorism. It’s like ‘we’re going to not only shut you down, I’m going to shut down the companies that are two hops above you on the internet.’”

“Proactively censoring is something they would do in Europe. It’s something they would do in the People’s Republic of China, and that’s okay because that’s their country, but Americans don’t do that,” Watkins said.

However, a culture against freedom of speech and expression has developed in the former land of the free because of commercial terrorist organizations like Sleeping Giants and their Big Tech enablers.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) has attempted to rectify the situation with legislation that would revoke special privileges for tech firms unless they can prove they are not exerting political bias.

“There’s a growing list of evidence that shows big tech companies making editorial decisions to censor viewpoints they disagree with,” Hawley said after he introduced legislation to amend enforcement of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

“Even worse, the entire process is shrouded in secrecy because these companies refuse to make their protocols public. This legislation simply states that if the tech giants want to keep their government-granted immunity, they must bring transparency and accountability to their editorial processes and prove that they don’t discriminate,” he added.

Until platform neutrality is established by law, the leftist war against the 1st Amendment will only intensify.

Tech

DHS Secretary Chad Wolf Labels Twitter Censorship as a National Security Threat

Twitter has been put on notice.

Published

on

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf labeled Twitter’s use of political and ideology as a national security threat on Friday.

Wolf explained how Twitter’s avaricious censorship represented a security threat to DHS operations in a lengthy letter to Jack Dorsey. He cited the recent censorship of senior Customs and Border Patrol Official Mark Morgan, whom Twitter had censored after he pointed out the effectiveness of a new border wall in deterring illegal alien crime and drug and human smuggling.

Read the letter here.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Wolf argued that “it should not be up to corporate bureaucrats to determine what security information the American public receives” when pointing out the national security threat of online censorship.

Wolf’s designation of Twitter’s censorious practices as a national security threat may lay the groundwork for federal officials to revoke the San Francisco company’s section 230 protections and open it to liability for acting as a publisher.

The freeze on Commissioner Morgan’s Twitter account was lifted after an outcry against the censorship. Twitter had claimed his tweets about the imperative of the border wall were promoted “hatred.”

A company that censors one of America’s frontline immigration law enforcement agencies is working with transnational criminal and smuggling organizations that have not only enriched themselves through trafficking illegal immigrants, but through the transit of opioids that have created an unmatched drug crisis in American communities.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending