Snowflakes
Country Singer Bashes Trump: “Jesus Would Not Have Voted For Him”
In an interview with The Guardian, a country singer bashed President Donald J. Trump and stood by previous comments that he made bashing Trump’s supporters.
“So I meant that, and I still mean it,” said Jason Isbell. “The whole point of Christianity is to behave as Jesus would have behaved – and Jesus would not have voted for Donald Trump, no matter what his pay was going to do as a result of that.”
Isbell was referring to a Rolling Stone interview in which he said that “God is gone from those people,” referring to Christian Trump supporters who like the President because of his sound economic policies.
The country singer has become a Democrat activist, playing at rallies for Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, a Democrat who is now running for a Senate seat.
It appears that Isbell is unaware of what Democrats are teaching our children in school, like transgenderism at age five, or how to orgasm at age 14. Maybe Jesus would have voted for that instead of Trump, but mere mortals should perhaps hold their tongues when considering speaking on behalf of the Lord.
Isbell had some harsh words for his critics, too, calling them “stupid.”
“Phil’s ahead by two points in that race right now,” he said. “I’m not going to say that that had anything to do with that, but there might have been a few people who thought: ‘OK, well if these people are stupid enough to call this recovering addict, whose pretty much probably too preachy in all honesty, if they are going to call him unhinged, then they don’t have any idea what people are thinking.’”
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?
Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.
Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.
Snowflakes
President Trump Rejects Paying For Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Private Security
The royal celebrities will foot the bill.
President Trump made it clear on a Sunday tweet that British royals Prince Harry and Meghan Markle would have to pay for their own security costs upon moving full-time to the United States, clarifying that they wouldn’t receive federal security under an existing arrangement that covers British royals temporarily visiting the US.
I am a great friend and admirer of the Queen & the United Kingdom. It was reported that Harry and Meghan, who left the Kingdom, would reside permanently in Canada. Now they have left Canada for the U.S. however, the U.S. will not pay for their security protection. They must pay!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 29, 2020
The royal celebrities have distanced themselves from the Queen, apparently viewing themselves as victims of relentless paparazzi and media attention.
Harry and Markle initially moved to Canada after resigning from the royal family, but they’ve recently moved to Hollywood just before the Canadian border was closed to nonessential travel due to the Chinese coronavirus epidemic. The elitist couple apparently plans on reinventing themselves as American-style celebrities, and have hired a small army of media consultants and public relations agents to market their image.
When information of their move to Los Angeles became public knowledge, many began to speculate if they’d recieve taxpayer-funded security in a manner akin to British royals visiting the United States on official state vists. President Trump’s Sunday tweet appears to eliminate that possibility.
The thirteen colonies that became the United States rebelled against the yoke of the British monarchy for a reason. President Trump’s decision to cut off the wannabee celebrities from publicly-funded security is a deeply American decision. The UK’s monarchy is one of the wealthiest legacy institutions in the western world, and it would be absurd to imagine that it can’t afford to hire private security for the ‘former’ royals, who are set to fully renounce their royal obligations at the end of the month.
-
Big League Wellness3 days agoDr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments
-
Big League Economics4 days agoThis Wall Street Firm Has Quietly Gained Control Over the Financial Sector During Coronavirus Panic
-
News3 days agoGLOBALISM: Bush Foundation Ships 2 Million Masks to China Despite Increasing Shortages in America
-
News3 days agoThe Wuhan Virus Takes a Bite Out of a Bronx Zoo Tiger
-
News3 days agoA Broken Clock is Right Twice a Day: Charlie Kirk Calls for Moratorium on All Visas During Wuhan Virus Pandemic
-
News3 days agoBritish Politicians Believe that the Wuhan Virus Pandemic Might Have Come from a Leak at a Chinese Laboratory
-
Big League Wellness3 days agoNew York Storefronts Boarded Up as Burglaries Rise 75%
-
Border Security3 days agoSmugglers Posing as Border Wall Construction Crew Arrested After Border Patrol Shootout
