At Summit News, Paul Joseph Watson reports that Danish history professor Uffe Østergaard believes it’s time to build a wall around Europe because mass migration has failed and, “Protecting borders is necessary, otherwise the population will rebel against the government”.
A well-established academic, Østergaard is a Jean Monnet professor of European civilization and integration at Aarhus University. He also teaches European and Danish history at Copenhagen Business School. His specialty lies in European identity. Østergaard has also studied multicultural and multiethnic states such as Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire and the states that succeeded them.
Beforehand, Østergaard was a staunch advocate of multiculturalism and the mass migration policies that it entails. However, he has changed his views on mass migration lately.
In an opinion piece for the Politiken newspaper, Østergaard expressed his new change of heart.
The headline of his piece states “The time has come to build walls with wire fences in four lanes, floodlights and guard posts.” In Østergaard’s view, not erecting barriers against mass migration will effectively create a schism between Western and Eastern Europe. This division will emerge because of conflicting views on how to handle immigration.
Østergaard writes, “Protecting borders is necessary, otherwise the population will rebel against the government.” The Danish historian points to the rise of immigrant ghettoes across Europe as a failure of multiculturalism.
The professor claims that “Ghettos are a good example of parallel societies that arise. The integration has not failed for everyone, but for relatively many people.”
Instead he believes that “assimilation”, not “integration” should be the main focus.
Østergaard thinks that it is not possible to assimilate such a large mass of people into welfare states.
The Danish historian does have a point.
Welfare states like Sweden have become magnets for Third World mass migration.
Immigration is not inherently bad, but it gets distorted in the context of the welfare state. Further, with a political class obsessed with multiculturalism, there is a concerted push to bring as many immigrants as possible just to satisfy the whims of politicians who want to meet diversity quotas.
This is a major problem in the West.
To solve it, a reduction in the welfare state and immigration policies that emphasize work over citizenship are needed. Depending on the context, erecting barriers and other restrictions are also sensible approaches.
However, the status quo is unsustainable and will eventually lead to social disintegration if it continues in its current form.
For that reason, GOP voters see it as the #1 issue in the upcoming 2020 elections.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Wuhan Locals Actually Believe 42,000 People Likely Died in the China Virus Outbreak Not the 3,200 that the Communist Government Originally Claimed
According to a Daily Mail report, Wuhan locals assert that 42,000 people were killed during the China virus pandemic that started in the aforementioned city.
This is more than ten times the figures that government authorities put forward after the virus broke out.
Official reports had 3,300 people dead and over 81,000 infected.
On the other hand, Wuhan residents claim 500 urns have been sent to grieving families every day from seven separate funeral homes in the city.
In other words, the ashes of 3,500 people are sent out every 24 hours.
42,000 urns could be handed out in a 12-day period.
According to local media reports, the Hankou premises received two shipments of 5,000 urns in only two days.
This development comes as the province loosened its two-month lockdown of 50 million people.
People who had a “green” health certificate – which signifies that they have tested negative for the virus – were allowed to leave the province from midnight on March 25, the first time they were allowed to leave the region since January 23.
However, restrictions on travelling into and out of Wuhan will stay in effect until April 8, 2020.
According to the account of one resident in Wuhan that RFA reported on, the individual said ‘It can’t be right because the incinerators have been working round the clock, so how can so few people have died?’
A source close to authorities in Hubei province declared that many residents had died in their homes without receiving an official diagnosis.
Another resident claimed: “Maybe the authorities are gradually releasing the real figures, intentionally or unintentionally, so that people will gradually come to accept the reality.”
They asserted that the estimated figure was not exaggerated given that 28,000 cremations took place in one month.
Trending on BLP
Big League Wellness3 days ago
POLL: 95% of Americans Support Coronavirus Travel Bans, Trump Approval Highest in Three Years
Tech2 days ago
National Center For Sexual Exploitation: Snapchat and Teen Vogue are Telling Kids to Make Child Porn!
News3 days ago
America First Patriot Kris Kobach Believes Democrats are Using the Wuhan Virus Crisis to Push Socialism
News4 days ago
Georgia State Rep. Wants to Suspend Enforcement of Concealed Carry Laws During Chinese Virus Crisis
Campaign 20204 days ago
Joe Rogan Takes Joe Biden To Task: “Trump Will Eat Him Alive”
Big League Wellness3 days ago
FLASHBACK: NYC Health Commissioner Said Coronavirus Risk Was “Low” Last Month
States3 days ago
California Lets Convicted Murderers of Children and Pregnant Woman Out of Jail Amidst Coronavirus Panic
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Pharma Insider: ‘First Data From Clinical Studies’ Indicates ‘Hydroxychloroquine Kills the Coronavirus’