Connect with us

Fake News Media

DISGUSTING: Avenatti Speculates About Kavanaugh’s Sex Life in CNN Interview

Published

on

The creepy porn lawyer for adult film actress Stormy Daniels was back on cable news last news, this time speculating about the sex life of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

“What exactly is [Kavanaugh] saying?” Avenatti asked. “Is he saying that he did not have sexual intercourse and are we going to get into a definition of that? Does that mean that he performed oral sex or had oral sex performed on him? Does that mean any host of any other sexual activities occurred, or does he want America to believe that the only thing that he did until well into his college years was effectively kiss or french kiss a woman?”

Avenatti was invited onto CNN with Chris Cuomo to discuss a new client whom he claims will produce more allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh, but devolved quickly into disgusting dialogue.

Trending: DYSTOPIAN: News Reporters Stalk Christians Worshipping at Church to Enforce COVID Mandates

This is the second recent interview on cable television in which Avenatti made people uncomfortable, after asking Tucker Carlson about his pornography watching habits in a September 13 interview on “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Avenatti simply cannot avoid perversion. Perhaps it has not occurred to him that ordinary Americans may not be as sex-crazed Los Angeles elites like him.

“I don’t traffic in rumor and nonsense,” Avenatti finished. “I traffic in facts and evidence.”

WATCH:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW3TODbSBgM

 

Fake News Media

National Review Spits on Whistleblowers Attesting to Massive Vote Fraud, Endorses Election Rigging

Published

on

The editors at the National Review have released an op/ed that essentially endorses widespread Democrat vote rigging and denigrates the efforts of whistleblowers who have attested via sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury to witnessing fraud on election day.

“The chief driver of the post-election contention of the past several weeks is the petulant refusal of one man to accept the verdict of the American people,” the editors wrote.

The editors paid lip service to concerns “about the security of mail-in ballots and the process of counting votes” but only to sweep the massive evidence of fraud under the rug. They claim that Trump has circulated “already-debunked claims and crackpot conspiracy theories about Dominion voting systems,” without doing much of anything to address many credible claims about the vote hacking software.

National Review proclaims the honor and the integrity of Republican officials who are refusing to investigate the electoral abnormalities or use their constitutionally-delegated powers to overturn the steal.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Trump’s most reprehensible tactic has been to attempt, somewhat shamefacedly, to get local Republican officials to block the certification of votes and state legislatures to appoint Trump electors in clear violation of the public will,” the editors wrote.

“This has gone nowhere, thanks to the honesty and sense of duty of most of the Republicans involved, but it’s a profoundly undemocratic move that we hope no losing presidential candidate ever even thinks of again,” they added.

It is worth noting that the op/ed by National Review did not mention the hundreds of sworn affidavits attesting to fraud one single time. The article makes it clear that these editors are a party to the color revolution coup that is underway against the president.

Big League Politics has covered the whistleblowers who have come forward amidst tremendous institutional pressure to tell the story of how the vote was stolen on election night:

Poll worker Mellissa Carone is going public after signing an affidavit that detailed extensive abnormalities happening at the absentee ballot counting board in the TCF Center in Detroit on election night.

Carone wrote in her affidavit about how ballots were scanned and counted multiple times at the facility. She has also attested that Republicans were deliberately disenfranchised throughout the process and robbed of their rights so they could not snuff out any potential fraud.

“I witnessed countless workers rescanning the batches without discarding them first which resulted in ballots being counted 4-5 times,” Carone wrote in her affidavit.

She appeared on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on Wednesday. Dobbs described an IT specialist who was “contracted by Dominion voting services to offer technical support while votes were being counted in Detroit.” Her attorney, David Kallman also appeared on the broadcast alongside her. She explained how mysterious food vans showed up bringing up cargo that did not appear to be food.

“I worked a 24 hour shift… I was there during their day shift and their night shift. The city provides the workers with food for their shift. Well, they only had enough food for one-third of their workers. So, that is the reason why they were claiming that these vans were brought in, but these vans did not have food in them,” Carone said.

“I was not allowed over in that area at all, but the van was definitely not big enough to be carrying food for two-thirds of those workers,” she added.

Kallman explained how he is proceeding with lawsuits to create an audit for the elections to ensure full transparency.

“Michigan now has a new constitutional provision that allows voters to request a results-oriented audit to ensure the accuracy and integrity of elections, so we are asking the court, and we did it today…The judge is going to rule at noon on Friday as to whether or not an injunction will issue to stop the certification of the vote and whether or not there or not will be an audit order as well as a protective order to protect evidence so it is not destroyed,” Kallman said.

The editors at National Review have picked a side and will have to live with the consequences of their behavior if the dubious election is overturned and those guilty of treason are punished appropriately.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending