DISGUSTING: Twitter Gives Platform for Pedophiles to Discuss the Finer Points of Raping Children
Last year, Big League Politics reported on how discussion of pedophilia and naked pictures of children would be allowed on Twitter, according to their own terms of service.
We exposed how Twitter quietly amended their terms of service to include “discussions related to… attraction towards minors” on their platform.
“Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way,” reads Twitter’s terms of service.
“Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors,” adds the terms of service.
In response to the article, many readers had a difficult time believing that Twitter was actually giving the green light for their platform to be used by pedophiles to network and discuss the sexual abuse of children.
One Twitter exchange makes it abundantly clear that the social network is being used by pedophiles, now called minor-attracted persons (MAPs) by liberal activists, to discuss the finer points of the disgusting abuse.
One Twitter user, @KevinRo31884980, asked pro-c MAPs, which means pedophiles who believe children can consent to sexual acts, a vile question about whether or not they would support causing physical pain to kids during intercourse:
Some of the responses are so heinous they can hardly be believed, and this is the type of chatter that the Twitter terms of service has been explicitly amended to allow.
Twitter changed their terms of service at the behest of Dr. James Cantor, who describes himself as a proud Jewish homosexual. Cantor is a leading advocate of rights for pedophiles, and works to cajole society into accepting their disgusting proclivities.
Cantor wrote a letter in Jan. 2018 to John Starr, who works as Director of Trust and Safety with Twitter, with other university academics. The letter urged Twitter to allow pedophiles to network and discuss their attraction to children on the monolithic social media platform.
“Many of us have worked with a group of such non-offending pedophiles, also known as anti-contact MAPs (Minor-Attracted Persons), in a peer support network called Virtuous Pedophiles (@virpeds), as well as in other support networks,” they wrote in their letter.
“Recently, a prominent member of Virtuous Pedophiles, who goes by the pseudonym Ender Wiggin (@enderphile2), had his account permanently suspended by Twitter. At least one other member of the same network, Šimon Falko (@simgiran), also had his account permanently suspended around the same time, and a number of other accounts of non-offending, anti-contact MAPs have since been permanently or temporarily suspended,” they added.
They argued that denying pedophiles a place on the social media platform may lead to these so-called virtuous pedophiles acting on their impulses to sexually victimize kids.
“In our professional opinions, terminating the accounts of non-offending, anti-contact MAPs is likely to result in the opposite effect of that which Twitter may expect or intend. Rather than reducing the incidence of child sexual abuse, if anything, it increases the risk that some pedophiles will be unable to obtain the peer or professional support that they may need in order to avoid offending behavior. It is also likely to increase the stigma and isolation associated with pedophilia and thereby increase the likelihood of some MAPs acting on their sexual feelings,” they wrote.
The pedo-acceptance movement is rapidly gaining steam, and has significant institutional support from Silicon Valley.