E. Jean Carroll said in a bizarre MSNBC interview Friday that she will not try to press any charges against President Donald Trump for her supposed rape, for which no video evidence exists. Carroll, vague on details about her alleged assault, said that pressing charges would be disrespectful to the women on the border who are raped and have very little to protect them. This is an issue that President Donald Trump has routinely stressed in his bid to secure the southern border from human sex traffickers. (READ: Clinton-Donating NXIVM Cult Imprisoned Child Sex Slaves From Mexico).
E. Jean Carroll, who offered an accusation that President Donald Trump attacked her with no video evidence, has praised Hillary Clinton and called herself a “radical feminist” in the same interview. Carroll notably did not make her accusation against Trump during the 2016 election or the first two years of Trump’s presidency.
President Trump responded to the New York magazine accusation:
— Laura Litvan (@LauraLitvan) June 21, 2019
“Jesus, what woman would not take George Clooney’s name? I’ve been married several times. I’ve never taken a man’s name in my life, but I would never tell Amal what to do. I’m a radical, radical feminist, and it doesn’t bother me at all…”Look at Michelle Obama. Look at Hillary Clinton,” she says. “There’s a million things that keep women down — earning only 78% of what men earn, for example — but changing your name is not one of them.”
New York Daily News passage ends
“I hate Bill O’Reilly!” Carroll said in another profile piece in which she described her dating game to break up couples by getting them to be mean-spirited to one another.
“If you lose a round, it’s because you didn’t think evilly enough,” Carroll said.
White Pill: Montana House Moves Constitutional Carry Bill Forward
Constitutional Carry is one ray of hope for the Right.
On January 20, 2021, the Montana House of Representatives passed Constitutional Carry legislation, HB102.
Weingarten provided some context to the significance of this bill’s progress:
The bill is the accumulation of a decade and a half of struggle against Democrat Governors, who have repeatedly vetoed reform legislation passed with large majorities in the legislature. Numerous sections in the bill show the Montana legislature has learned the lesson from other states as they restore the right to keep and bear arms.
Montana’s Senate is made up of 31 Republicans and 19 Democrats and Governor Greg Gianforte is a Republican, so the passage of this bill augurs well. If passed, HB102 would make Montana the 17th Constitutional Carry state.
Montana is already a very gun-friendly state, and represents a low-hanging fruit for Second Amendment activists to tap into.
Constitutional Carry has been one of the most successful movements on the Right over the past twenty years. It’s easy to complain about the corrupt status quo, but there are still plenty of ways right-wingers can score victories. Constitutional Carry is one of them.
It would behoove the Right to analyze existing trends and build off movements that are already producing results. There’s no need to embark on quixotic campaigns that end up being total fools’ errands. Find what’s already working and run with it.
The Swamp2 days ago
Democrats Move to Ban Trump Supporters From Joining the Military and Holding Federal Jobs
Big League Wellness3 days ago
Biden Nullifies Trump Executive Order Issued to Reduce Prices of Insulin and Epinephrine
White House4 days ago
Biden White House Makes YouTube Upload of Inaugural Speech ‘Unlisted’ After Being Flooded With Dislikes
Congress3 days ago
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls Biden a ‘Threat to National Security’, Files Impeachment Resolution
Politics3 days ago
Mitch McConnell Censured by Nelson County, Kentucky Republican Party for Betrayal of President Trump
Globalism2 days ago
UK’s Prince Harry Demands Social Media Censorship of Americans
Tech4 days ago
Lawsuit: Twitter Kept Child Porn on Platform Because It Does Not Violate Their Terms of Service
The Swamp1 day ago
What Happens If John Roberts Decides Not to Preside Over Trump’s Post-Presidency Impeachment Trial?