Connect with us


Election Meddling: YouTube Kicks Immigration Patriot Group VDARE Off Its Platform



YouTube continued its crusade against free speech by suspending immigration restriction website VDARE on August 10, 2020. And it did so on the grounds that VDARE allegedly violated its so-called “hate speech” policies.

The immigration restriction website is appealing the decision and seeking to build other alternatives. So far, VDARE has over 12,000 subscribers and joins other channels such as American Renaissance, InfoWarsStefan MolyneuxNick Fuentes or RedIce that have been sent to the digital gulag.

Lydia Brimelow, VDARE’s advancement officer, made it clear why YouTube took down VDARE:

This YouTube atrocity is yet another reminder that the forces behind Donald Trump’s improbable 2015-2016 rise to the White House—remember, he literally ran and won on the patriotic immigration reform platform that has long advocated–are being repressed, in a clear and conscious campaign of election interference by the Tech Totalitarians.

Previously, BLP reported on VDARE potentially getting kicked off the Internet by its domain registrar. However, this fear ended up being a false alarm thankfully.

Followers can still find VDARE content at Bitchute.

Organizations like VDARE get censored for the simple reason that they promote issues like immigration restriction — a clear deviation from the managerial orthodoxy.

The very fabric of the American nation is at stake, which has led many dissidents to take up the mantle of immigration patriotism. VDARE has been a leader in exposing the effects of mass migration for over two decades. Such work has put them in the crosshairs of the Big Tech hive mind.

Right wing dissidents can still support them through tax-deductible donations, subscribe to their mailing list, and sign up to receive their VDARE Quarterly if they prefer to receive hard copies of their content.


Big League Guns

Merrick Garland Suggests that Getting Rid of Lawsuit Protections is Not a Second Amendment Violation

Garland as AG will be a disaster for the right to bear arms.



If Merrick Garland is nominated as Attorney General, the Second Amendment is in big trouble.

Based on his comments at a Senate hearing on February 22, 2021, Garland made a suggestion that the repeal of lawsuit protections for gun manufacturers is not unconstitutional. 

AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News reminded his readers that President Joe Biden campaigned on a platform of repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shielded lawful gun manufacturers from lawsuits.

In a previous Breitbart News report, Biden spoke at an MSNBC forum in 2019 alongside gun control organizations such as March for Our Lives where he expressed his support for gun manufacturers to be subject to lawsuits.

take our poll - story continues below

POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024?

  • POLL: Would you vote for Donald Trump in 2024? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

At the speech, Biden suggested that the PLCC be repealed. He declared, “No other outfit in history has gotten this kind of protection” and asserted that the legal actions would bring about “change overnight.”

In a subsequent occasion on February 7, 2020, Breitbart News covered Biden’s remarks to a New Hampshire crowd, in which he stated that it was a “mistake” to shield firearms manufacturers from lawsuits. He continued, “The first thing I’m going to do as president is work to get rid of that.” 

Later that month, Breitbart News recalled how Biden called out gun manufacturers at a South Carolina rally and boasted, “I’m going to take you down.”

According to a report by The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked Garland about his views on removing protections for gun manufacturers. Garland responded, “I have not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t think it raises a Second Amendment issue.”

When he was questioned if he is in favor of Biden’s plans to ban so-called “assault weapons”, Garland responded, “Where there is room under the law for the president’s policies to be pursued, then I think the president is entitled to pursue them.”

Biden’s track record as a gun control proponent is well-documented. From his support of gun-free zones at schools to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, Biden is Gun Control Inc.’s guy. With Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, there will most certainly be attempts to ram gun control down our throats. If they can’t beat us legislatively, they will most certainly use the courts to undermine the Second Amendment. Pro-gun organizations should be ready to lawyer up and use whatever means possible to keep courts from destroying our rights.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!