Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Uncategorized

Establishment Pushes Conspiracy Theories To Explain David Hogg’s Changing Story

Groups with Soros ties are trying to suppress the story.

Published

on

Earlier this evening, Big League Politics rocked the internet with a story exposing discrepancies in David Hogg’s original telling of events during the shooting in Parkland, Florida, casting serious doubt that he was even in the school at the time of the shooting.

The story includes a video that lays out the doubts very clearly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37zoQLgqEy0

In short, Hogg, who is one of the most vocal leaders in the anti-gun Never Again movement, had discrepancies in his initial statements of his experience during the shooting. Following the shooting, Hogg initially stated that he was in the building when shots rang out. But in a later released interview with CBS News, Hogg stated that he grabbed his camera equipment and rode his bike three miles from his home to his school to document the shooting that he admits he wasn’t sure happened yet.

Trending: Meet The Restaurant Owners Who Kicked Out Sarah Sanders

Shortly after our story was released, Red State reporter Sarah Rumpf released a now heavily redacted story mirroring our findings. But shortly after releasing her story, it was redacted based on claims made by far-left media outfit Vox.

The Vox article reads:

“At 6 pm after the shooting, I took my camera, got on my bike. I rode in basically twilight. And I ride my bike three miles down winding sidewalks and find my way to the school, as I’ve done in previous years. All the while, I was making sure my camera bag didn’t rip open, because if you zip it a certain way, the camera falls out, and it would be destroyed.”

In response, Big League Politics has been receiving scrutiny from news organizations with known links to George Soros and other leftists. The anti-Trump Reagan Battalion even directly told their followers not to share our article. Those demands were then mirrored by political hacks working for Never Trump candidates.

Despite these attacks on us, which is to expected when breaking stories that challenge the mainstream media narrative, our story is crystal clear and accurate.

Here’s why the Left-Wing Conspiracy Theory Explanation Is Totally Bogus:

In the CBS News interview, where Hogg states that he rode his bike to school in order to document the shooting, Hogg alludes that he did not know if the mass shooting had occurred yet. According to the Vox article, which Red State referenced to redact their original article, Hogg did not leave on his bike to go to the school until 6:00 PM, hours after the shooting occurred.

But according to video that he took in the school earlier, Hogg claimed to have heard gun shots around 2:30 PM, and later heard a gun shot at 2:52, when according to the official timeline the gun shots stopped at 2:28 PM.

Hogg also identified the shooter as Nikolas Cruz at 3:13 PM, according to the video he took. This raises another un-answered question: Cruz was not apprehended until 3:41, and according to Hogg, the students he was with had been in lockdown for at least the previous hour. Media reports did not confirm his name until hours later. How could they have known it was Cruz? Even if someone had seen Cruz during the actual shooting, it’s unlikely that they would have known Cruz. The school has around 3200 students, and Hogg himself admits in the CBS documentary that he did not even know the 17 people who were killed.

This information clearly casts serious doubt on the fact that David Hogg was in the school when the shooting occurred. While other news organizations will back out and believe every claim coming from far-left news publications, Big League Politics will continue to ask the questions that nobody else dares ask.

This is a developing story, and we will keep you updated on any new developments.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Top Story

Pro-Trump Republican Who Defeated Sanford Hit By Oncoming Car On Highway 17

Published

on

A lawmaker who recently defeated incumbent South Carolina Rep. Mark Sanford in a Republican congressional primary earlier this month is recovering from serious injuries after a head-on collision with a vehicle operating in the wrong direction on U.S. Highway 17.

Charleston County Sheriff’s Office reported that Katie Arrington, newly elected South Carolina lawmaker, and a friend identified as Jacqueline Goff of Mandeville, Louisiana, were traveling southbound on U.S. Highway 17 around 9 p.m. Friday night a vehicle headed in the wrong direction struck Arrington’s vehicle head-on. According to Sheriff’s Captain Roger Antonio, the driver of the other vehicle died on the scene.

Katie Arrington, Summerville Republican underwent surgery to remove portions of her colon and her small intestines as well as having sustained a back fracture, and broken ribs. She is recovering in a local Charleston-area hospital said spokesperson for Arrington, Michael Mule. Her friend, Jacqueline Goff was also seriously injured and is recovering today.

Mule said Arrington would need several more surgeries, as well as a stent to repair the partial collapse of the primary artery in her legs which will require her to remain in the hospital for at least two weeks. Mule reported to news outlets that Arrington was alert and talking on Saturday morning.

In a statement released to the press, Mule said “Katie asks for your continued prayers for the deceased and the deceased’s family, as well as prayers for a quick recovery for Katie and her friend.”

A statement was also released on the official Katie Arrington Facebook page asking for prayers and support:

Arrington’s recent win over “Never-Trumper” Sanford made national headlines as well as Arrington securing Trump’s support hours before the primary ballot. Arrington was vocal of her support of Trump throughout her campaign and used Sanford’s criticism as a cornerstone of her campaign.

“I fully endorse Katie Arrington for Congress in SC, a state I love,” tweeted Trump ahead of the primary. “She is tough on crime and will continue our fight to lower taxes. VOTE Katie!”

Trump later reportedly mocked Mark Sanford at a meeting with House Republicans: “ I want to congratulate Mark on a great race.”

This morning, the president tweeted sending his thoughts and prayers to the lawmaker as well as her friend and their families.

Continue Reading

Top Story

Clinton Donor Clare Bronfman ‘Expects To Be Indicted’ In Sex Cult Child-Trafficking Case

Published

on

Hillary Clinton presidential campaign donor Clare Bronfman, heiress to the Seagrams fortune, “expects to be indicted by late July” in the NXIVM sex cult case.

NXIVM leaders Keith Raniere and “Smallville” actress Allison Mack were arrested in Mexico and stand trial for human trafficking, child sex trafficking, and other crimes. Raniere is being held without bail while Mack is in the custody of her parents with an ankle bracelet. Bronfman, who oversaw the group’s experiments on women and children at their secretive “Rainbow Cultural Center,” is expected to be charged.

Charles Hurt reported that in the spring of 2007, “executives and top associates…along with their family members” of NXIVM donated $29,900 to the Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential campaign.

Kirsten Gillibrand has also taken money from the group’s high-profile socialite member Bronfman, and her father actually worked for the cult.

The group’s former publicist and foremost whistleblower Frank Parlato tells Big League Politics that Bronfman is preparing herself for prosecution.

Parlato tells BLP that Raniere “believes himself to be Lucifer.”

“I worked as the publicist,” Frank Parlato told Big League Politics. “We ran into a major disagreement and we split. At the time I worked for them I thought they were a little peculiar but it wasn’t until the end that I realized they were a downright evil group.”

“There are women on the record who are now adults who have accused Raniere of statutory rape and there are some very suspicious incidents where Mexican girls came under the perimeters of Raniere’s control and left under suspicious circumstances. They came from Chihuahua Mexico. I reported this to the authorities,” Parlato said.

Human Experiments (READ MORE ABOUT THIS HERE)

Parlato described the bizarre human experiments that Raniere and his benefactors the Bronfman sisters oversaw at the Rainbow Cultural Garden, where they separated children from their parents. Dr. Porter is identified as Raniere’s human experiments chief.

“They do the human fright experiments where they subject women to surprise graphic viewings” similar to A Clockwork Orange, Parlato said.

“The most diabolical experiments that he conducts are experiments where babies are subjected to a constant succession of strangers who take care of them instead of their parents, and the strangers teach them foreign languages,” Parlato said.

“The cult members’ children, they are pressured to give up their children to Raniere. They pay $10,000 to Raniere for the privilege of having Raniere teach them how to speak.”

Seven different nannies would spend time with the children each day and speak seven different languages, rendering the children illiterate, confused, and permanently intellectually damaged.

“Adults are shellshocked now having been through this,” Parlato said.

“The children are housed with their parents and then the children either go to a school, Rainbow School, or the nannies who were sex slaves come to the house,” he said. “The courses run for 6 months to 7 years or so, at which point Raniere alleges the young child’s brain is most susceptible to these different languages and cultures. They get them right at 6 months and the program has only been around for (a few years) so there’s only a limited number of parents.”

Gillibrand’s family

“Her father Doug Rutnik came to work as a consultant for NXIVM…he was fired, they sued him, and they had to pay him $100,000,” Parlato said, referring Gillibrand’s father.

“Her father’s wife, her stepmother, was also a member of NXIVM…Doug got her into the cult, Gillibrand’s father got Gillibrand’s future stepmother into the cult. Doug left the cult because he was sued. Clare Bronfman after her father was sued donated money to Gillibrand. Gillibrand accepted it.”

“One is inclined to call her a liar,” Parlato says of Gillibrand.

“The Clintons got a lot of money from NXIVM, NXIVM members, one of their main NXIVM members was a guy named Richard Mays, he encouraged Clinton to indict their enemies, to use their political influence in Arkansas to indict enemies of Raniere,” Parlato said….

Continue Reading

Culture

RIP PEPE: EU Votes ‘Yes’ on Meme Ban

Published

on

In a devastating blow to those who enjoy internet freedom, a group of leftist government bureaucrats have effectively banned memes from Europe.

“Article 13 (a.k.a. censorship machines) will make platforms responsible for monitoring user behavior to stop copyright infringements, but basically means only huge platforms will have the resources to let users comment or share content,” according to The Next Web. “People opposed to the proposal worry that this could lead to broader censorship, threatening free speech via parody, satire, and even protest videos.”

Since memes are usually made from copyrighted images, the European Union has essentially outlawed them.

The meme magicians responded exactly the way one would expect.

“EU voted to pass [Article 13] and ban memes…it is time – Meme War 3 has begun,” said an anonymous Twitter user.

“EU is voting to ban Memes through censorship machines. #LOL,” said Narek Panossian, attaching two memes to his tweet.

Even Yahoo UK savored some of the absurd, using a caption photo with a popular meme:

Not all European lawmakers are on board, though.

“[The Copyright Directive is] on the verge of causing irreparable damage to our fundamental rights and freedoms, our economy and competitiveness, our education and research, our innovation and competition, our creativity and our culture,” wrote Julia Reda, a German politician and Member of the European Parliament on her websiteAccording to Reda’s site, “over 80 signatories representing human and digital rights organisations, media freedom organisations, publishers, journalists, libraries, scientific and research institutions, educational institutions including universities, creator representatives, consumers, software developers, start-ups, technology businesses and Internet service providers.”

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Send this to a friend