Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Big League Economics

Citizen Files FBI Complaint Against Comey For ‘Two Separate Felonies’ For Memo Leak

Published

on

An FBI complaint has been filed against former FBI director James Comey for allegedly committing “two separate felonies” following his testimony Thursday before the U.S. Senate.

Citizen researcher and activist Larry Kawa provided Big League Politics with the text of his complaint, which alleges that Comey committed “embezzlement” in connection to his possession and transmittance of a memo regarding President Trump, and also “conspiring to defraud the United States.”

Comey admitted to leaking contents of a memo — in which a conversation between Comey and the president was discussed — to The New York Times through an intermediary source.

Here is the text of the FBI complaint (emphasis added):

“Per 18 USC 4, I am required to report to you my knowledge of what I believe to be an actual commission of two separate felonies on the part of former FBI director James Comey. I believe there has been embezzlement as defined under 18 USC 641 for its reliance upon the predicate set forth in SCOTUS per Moore v. United States, 160 U.S. 268, 269 (1895); “Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom such property has been entrusted, or into whose hands it has lawfully come.” I assert this in regard to his confiscation and conveyance of an official and potentially classified/privileged memo to an unknown source as admitted in his Senate hearing today June 8, 2017. This is in regard to the intentional leaking of the official memo he generated subsequent to his private meeting with President Trump. 

Additionally I hereby assert that Comey is also guilty of a secondary charge of conspiring to defraud the United States under 18 USC 371. He conspired with an unnamed accomplice he mentioned during his Senate hearing today, June 8, 2017. He cited an unnamed law professor at Columbia University with whom he admitted to feloniously leak his embezzled memo. Comey appropriated an official memo he generated in his capacity as FBI director and has conspired to defraud as defined in SCOTUS per Hass, 216 U.S. at 479-480. In Hammerschmidt,“to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest.”

While Comey submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee today that he had a collateral purpose/secondary agenda for embezzlement in conjunction with conspiracy, that does not absolve him of either the act of embezzlement nor the act of conspiracy to defraud the United States. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter and I assert that I have fulfilled my duty under 18 USC 4 in disclosing my knowledge of what I believe to be two felony counts per 18 USC 641 (embezzlement) and 18 USC 371 (conspiracy to defraud the United States).”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Big League Economics

Derrick Wilburn Explains Why Democrats Are So OLD

Published

on

Derrick Wilburn of Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives (RMBC) explains in a stirring new piece shared on Facebook why the Democratic Party leaders are so old, while the Republican Party — adherent to its own term-limit laws — provides fresh faces in committee leadership.

Wilburn writes:

Quick, name a nationally-prominent Republican who’s under 60 years of age. Those who pay even the least bit of attention to the political game can likely name Tim Scott (52), Marco Rubio (46), Mia Love, (48), Ted Cruz (46), Rand Paul (54), Trey Gowdy (51), Nikki Haley (46) among others.

In recent weeks as many as 7 Republicans who are current committee chairmen have announced their intentions to retire from Congress. Why? Many in the media are attempting to sell the narrative that its because they sense impending doom. Not true. Its’ because the Republican caucus term limits its chairmanships and these have reached the end of their terms.

A recent piece in TheHill.com spotlights a key difference between the way the Republican caucus & Democrat caucus in Washington D.C. operate, but a difference few in the USA are aware of: “The term-limit policy, put in place by former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) in 1994, was designed to keep the party from growing stale by regularly injecting new blood and fresh ideas into the mix.”

The GOP’s self-imposed rule is that legislators can not serve more than six years as the party’s top lawmaker on a committee. So once you’ve chaired a committee for six, you’re out and it someone else’s turn. And there’s no back-dooring it. Once you’re done, you’re done. You can’t return to committee member status for a year or two then run for Chair again. They can chair another committee, but not the same one again.

Democrats have no such rules and its at least a part of the reason there’s such a lack of youth in the Dem caucus leadership.

Apply the same question which opened this newsletter to today’s Democrat party leadership — *quick*, name a prominent Democrat, someone with presence on a national level — who’s under 60 years of age. Nancy Pelosi (78), Harry Reid (tho now retired most can name him, 80), Diane Feinstein (84), Chuck Schumer (68), Maxine Waters (80), Elizabeth Warren (70), Bernie Sanders (76 – tho technically an Independent not a Democrat) & the list goes on. All nationally prominent, all 70, 75, 80+ years of age.

Where’s the youth? Blame, at least in part, a lack of (self-imposed) term limits.

Democrats pay their dues early in their careers by carrying the water (i.e. providing necessary votes) and one day ascend to the desired position of Committee Chair, then stay there, …forever.

So what happens often times is younger Democrats win local elections, get to D.C., look up and realize that these old farts aren’t going anyplace! The old guard is from districts in which they can’t be un-elected; they’ve been their for 25 years; been chair for 14; are currently 72 years old meaning they’ll be Committee Chair for at least another 10 or 15 until they retire (if they ever do.) So the young bucks realize, “I’m frozen out.”

For example: Rep. John Conyers, who was forced to (finally) resign in December amid the #MeToo scandal, was born in 1929. Conyers helped draft the presidential articles of impeachment — against Richard Nixon! Conyers first won a seat on the Judiciary Committee in 1965. He first became Chair of the House Oversight Committee in 1989.

Imagine you’re a young lawyer, say 46 years old, a Democrat who just won an election and your dream has been to get to D.C. one day and chair a committee that’s chaired (when Dems are in power) by 70 y/o Elizabeth Warren. You know good & darn well that you’ve no hope of that chairmanship for another 10 or 15 years! What’s that do for your hopes for your future?

You’ve heard of, seen and know Trey Gowdy, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Tim Scott, and they’re nationally prominent because they get a shot at the top much earlier in their careers and that, at least in part, summarizes why pretty much the only Democrats you see on the nightly news speaking from a podium into a microphone at press conferences are old farts. Nancy Pelosi, Chuch Schumer. That’s just about it.

The situation caused the National Review to write a major piece which it titled “Old-Guard Democrats Refuse to Leave the Stage” sub-title “They’re keeping new leaders from emerging.”

Are term limits a good thing? That debate rages on. But the Capital Hill Republican party took the step of self-imposing them 25 years ago and it cannot be argued that the step has not created some very noticeable separation and differences between the parties.

-A Derrick Wilburn original

 

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Big League Politics insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend