Connect with us

DC Whispers

Facebook BANS Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Son For Criticizing Islamic Terrorists

Published

on

In another example of Silicon Valley Sharia, Facebook has banned Yair Netanyahu, the son of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a post critical of radical Islam.

Yair’s post, which was in response to the death of the two IDF soldiers killed by Palestinian terrorists in Givat Assaf, was removed by Facebook, and he was issued a 24 hour ban on his account.

Facebook deleted Yair’s post in which he said he’d “prefer” if “All the Muslims leave the land of Israel.”

Trending: ILHAN’S DISTRICT: 17-Year-Old GOP Volunteer Shot Dead Outside of Gas Station in Minneapolis

Because Facebook has apparently decided alongside Twitter and Google to be Sharia compliant, Yair was punished for a post that adequately expresses the sentiments shared by the many people who live in Israel and are subjected to the hate, violence, and terror of Palestinian terrorists on a daily basis.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Yair has been the focus of many Left wing media attacks as a result of his frequent social media posts that have been critical of Islam, HAMAS, and globalist onetime Nazi collaborator George Soros.

In a previous Facebook post, Yair wrote,

“Now finally this word is allowed, I’ll say what everyone in the country knows. Left-wing NGOs funded by foreign and hostile governments, the politicians on the left and media people who always side with the enemy and always against Jewish interests, whose hearts are hardened against victims of terror, settlers or victims of infiltrators, and on the other hand whose hearts are full of compassion for every Arab rioter wounded on the Gaza border – they are the traitors!”

Despite the fact that he is often under attack for his speech, I believe that Yair’s posts are justified and factual.

The Qur’an tells all Muslims “not to make friendship with Jews and Christians” (5:51), “kill the disbelievers wherever we find them” (2:191), “murder them and treat them harshly” (9:123), “fight and slay the Pagans, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem.”

A phobia is defined as an “irrational fear.” It is not irrational to fear things that want to kill you, which is why many people feel Yair’s comments are completely justified.

After being banned by Facebook, Yair posted,

“The Thought Police of Facebook has found me! Congratulations! Facebook has official pages created by Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian government members, as well as endless pages calling for the murder and extermination of Jews. There are also thousands posts with death threats for me and my family that do not get removed by Facebook, as they fall under the label of freedom of speech.”

Yair also called Facebook a dictatorship and asked why his post was worthy of a ban. His comments align with comments I recently made after I was permanently banned by Twitter after I posted facts about Ilhan Omar, a newly elected Muslim Congresswoman who is anti-Jewish, pro-Sharia, anti-Israel, and pro-Hamas.

Like Yair, I am Jewish, and I was also banned for posting facts based on observations.

Less than 24 hours after I was banned by Twitter, I was banned by Facebook for 30 days. Not only did Facebook not give me a reason for my 30 day ban, but they clearly coordinated the ban with Twitter in an act of big tech collusion to silence me, a Conservative Jewish journalist.

Yair’s ban is yet another example of big tech social media bias against Jews, something that is becoming more commonplace as social media companies have begun to openly embrace Sharia law and Jew hatred.

All across the world, people are being silenced, censored, and even jailed for having online discussions about Islam, immigration, jihad, and Sharia. I was banned for posting facts about Islam. In other words, non-Muslims are being subjected to Islamic blasphemy laws on social media, progressively.

Why is that?

Put simply, Twitter is funded by Saudi Arabia and thus their terms of service policies are pro-Sharia and anti-First Amendment. This is why Twitter keeps banning conservatives, Jews, and Christians. It is worth noting that Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal owns more Twitter stock than Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. The Saudi billionaire doubled his stake in Twitter in 2015.

In response to my Twitter ban and the Silicon Valley Sharia, I handcuffed myself to Twitter HQ in NYC on November 29, 2018. While handcuffed, I wore a yellow Juden star, identical to those worn by Jews in the time leading up to the Holocaust. Just like the Nazis made lists of political dissidents who they marked and banned with yellow stars, Twitter, Facebook, and Google are modern day techno-fascists in the way they are silencing Conservatives, Jews, and Christians who dare speak truth about radical Islam and terrorism.

During my protest, while I held a sign that read “Jew hatred, A-Ok! Nosey Jew? BANNED” at Twitter, I said,

“Twitter, Facebook, Apple, Google, Instagram, they are essentially upholding Sharia. Silicon Valley is essentially upholding Sharia when they decide to ban me for posting facts about Islam, when they decide to ban me for posting facts about Sharia law and criticizing an anti-Jewish Muslim Congresswoman.”

 

Twitter, Facebook, and Google have some serious explaining to do regarding their “terms of service.” As I mentioned following my Twitter and Facebook bans, the Left-wing and Islamic bias displayed by these social media companies is overbearingly obvious.

How is it that a Jewish Conservative journalist and the Israeli Prime Minister’s son get banned on social media for posting facts about Islam, but Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Louis Farrakhan, and Iranian dictators who chant “death to Israel” and “death to America” all have verified Facebook and Twitter accounts?

Through their pro-Sharia terms of service, Facebook and Twitter are clearly signaling that it’s ok to be a terrorist, but not ok to be a Conservative, or a Jew.

Here is more supporting evidence that big tech social media companies are anti-Jewish:

In July 2018, Mark Zuckerberg sparked outrage when he said he didn’t see a reason to ban Holocaust deniers on Facebook. Meanwhile, he finds it very necessary to ban Conservatives and Jews.

In October 2018, Twitter released a statement saying it was not a violation of their terms of service when Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, called Jews termites. Twitter said they would not ban Farrakhan, even though he has called for Jews to be eradicated and publicly proclaimed “Hitler was a great man”.

In November 2018, Twitter was forced to apologize after they allowed for #KillAllJews to trend for several hours.

In November 2018, Airbnb withdrew listings of Israeli homes in Judea and Samaria, in an attempt to side with the Palestinians and BDS movement.

You get the point.

In another shocking act of censorship and tyranny displayed by big tech social media companies, two ardent critics of Islam on Twitter received notices from the social media company informing them they violated Pakistani law.

Both Imam Tawhidi, a Muslim scholar from Australia and Ensaf Haidar, a Canadian human rights activist and wife of Raif Badawi, a Saudi writer who has been imprisoned and tortured in Saudi Arabia for his satirical blogs, recently received notifications from Twitter informing them of their “violations” of Pakistani blasphemy laws.

Twitter and Facebook aren’t the only big tech and social media companies enforcing Sharia law.

A new Android app launched last month with the focus of allowing Muslims to report individuals who commit blasphemy, or insult Islam. The app, “Smart Pakem”, which launched in Indonesia last month at the request of the Indonesian government, will allow users and government officials to uphold Sharia law and target and report people who hold “misguided” beliefs in violation of Islamic law, which forbids insults of Islam, insults against the Prophet Mohammed, or the recognition of any other religion besides Islam.

As a Jew, and as an Israeli, Yair has every reason in the world to dislike Islam. For the sake of survival, non-Muslims should embrace Yair’s comments about Islam instead of portraying him as a villain, because it is Yair’s comments that will help secure the Jewish state and its people in the digital war against the radical Mohammedan.

I stand with Yair Netanyahu.

Read More about Silicon Valley Sharia here.

Laura Loomer is a conservative investigative journalist and activist. Originally from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover journalist for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications. Support Laura Loomer’s Independent Journalism here: PayPal.me/lauraloomer

 
Subscribe to lauraloomer.us today.
Follow Laura Loomer on Facebook.

Follow Laura Loomer on Instagram.

 

 

 

 

 

Rants

Chuck Schumer Threatens Supreme Court Justices: “You Will Pay the Price”

Chilling language.

Published

on

Chuck Schumer outright threatened two Supreme Court Justices when speaking at a pro-abortion event on Wednesday, using vengeful and vindictive language when discussing recent pro-life court case rulings reached by the court.

Watch here:

I want to tell you, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh…. You have unleashed the whirlwind, and you will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.

Such rhetoric might be expected in one of Kim Jong Un’s regular missive of threats against the United States. But it’s shocking to hear a sitting Senate Majority Leader slam nonpartisan Supreme Court Justices in such a bold fashion, totally disregarding the court’s traditional independence from everyday politics.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The rally by a pro-abortion group was being held in advance of an expected court ruling on a Louisiana abortion law. The law requires abortionists to have admitting privileges at state hospitals.

Republican legislators slammed Schumer for his irresponsible and threatening rhetoric at the abortion rally after footage of his language was seen on Twitter.

Schumer may have been alluding to potential Democratic plans to impeach Kavanaugh, and possibly even Gorsuch, removing them from the Supreme Court. The Court’s now conservative majority has placed a major stumbling block in the way of the Left’s preferred strategy of seizing power through judicial activism.

Schumer’s unprecedented language, especially coming from a senior party official who should remain level-headed, demonstrates the Democratic Party’s willing to cast aside all formal norms of federal politics and government. They’re willing to do whatever it takes in order to get their way.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending