Connect with us

Tech

Facebook Bans ‘Paloma For Trump’ Page For Photo of President Trump

Facebook banned the Mexican-American activist for posting a photo of herself and President Trump.

Published

on

Facebook Bans Paloma For Trump Photo of Presiden

Facebook banned the page ‘Paloma for Trump’ after Paloma, a Mexican-born supporter of the president, posted a photo of President Donald Trump with herself in the background to the big tech platform.

Paloma describes herself as “an American loving activist, born in Mexico,” who immigrated to this country legally, and an ” came to America legally, and says she thanks God for the “gift and blessing it is to be a part of the greatest country in the world.”

She routinely attends President Trump’s rallies, and once stood in the crowd behind him as he delivered his remarks. Paloma posted a photo of herself standing behind President Trump during his rally to Facebook, and the big tech platform proceeded to ban her page, claiming that the photo of herself with the president violates their community standards.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In a YouTube live stream discussing her ban, Paloma explained that, in her view, this is an example of Facebook purging conservative opinions.

“Today I wake up to the news that Facebook decided that because of a photo of our president with me in the background, [this] was good enough to take my page down.”

“I’m not concerned about my page, I’m concerned about my message,” said Paloma. “Numbers mean nothing unless our message is getting out.”

She explained that the taken of her standing behind the president was during his El Paso, Texas rally, and that this was apparently offensive to Facebook’s anti-conservative sensibilities.

“Facebook is shutting conservative voices down,” the activist said. “Facebook is shutting us down.”

The activist said that she will not let her Facebook ban weigh her down in the live stream, telling viewers that “No matter what Facebook does, my message is already out there.”

This latest ban comes after Facebook banned several prominent conservatives from its platform, including Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, and Milo Yiannopoulos. Facebook also confirmed to Big League Politics that it may take the unprecedented additional step of banning any Facebook user who posts links or videos containing Jones.

Big League Politics contacted Facebook for comment on this story and did not receive an immediate response.

Tech

BANNED BY GOOGLE: #DetroitLeaks Video Showing Evidence of Electoral Fraud is Removed From Youtube

The video had received tens of thousands of views.

Published

on

A video detailing the explosive evidence of election trainers in the city of Detroit telling poll workers how to lie to voters, destroy ballots, and disenfranchise poll challengers on election day has been removed from YouTube.

YouTube, the Google-owned monopoly video platform, issued a notice to the Detroit Leaks channel claiming that the video was pulled because it violated their terms of service with regards to spam, deceptive practices and scams. This is the channel’s first strike on the platform. Continued violations could result in the removal of the page permanently.

“Content that contains spam, scams, and other deceptive practices that take advantage of the community are not allowed on YouTube. This includes titles, thumbnails, or descriptions that promises users something in the video but actually directs them on to another site,” Google wrote in their notice about the censoring of the #DetroitLeaks video.

The Detroit Leaks page has appealed the decision made by YouTube and are demanding the immediate reinstatement of the video on the platform.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The video is accurately presented and described. Please reverse this capricious censorship that could also be considered a form of electoral interference. Thanks,” the page wrote in their appeal to Google.

The violation was sent on the night of Thursday, Oct. 29, as Google’s electoral interference schemes kick into high gear:

The video can now be accessed on BitChute here.

Big League Politics reported earlier in the week on how the #DetroitLeaks revelations have resulted in the reaffirmation of the rights of poll challengers in the Michigan courts:

One day after vowing to fight a crucial voter integrity lawsuit in the courts, the Michigan attorney general’s office has conceded to demands that plaintiffs believe will clarify the role of poll challengers in the state.

The case was heard in the Michigan Court of Claims, which springs from shocking #DetroitLeaks revelations that show election workers cackling as their instructor explains how they will be able to use COVID-19 social distancing rules to disenfranchise poll challengers.

Attorneys Philip Ellison and Matt Gronda appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs, state representative candidate Stephen Carra and electoral integrity watchdog Bob Cushman. Assistant attorney general Erik Grill attended on behalf of Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel.

“At this point, your honor, I am happy to report that the parties and the attorneys have been working very diligently this morning to try and reach a resolution, and I’m happy to report that we have,” Gronda said.

He explained that the secretary of state’s office will be sending out an explicit notice before Oct. 29 at 5pm that makes clear the rights of poll challengers and watchers.

Gronda said that the new directive would be approximate to this: “Challengers and poll watchers have certain rights and responsibilities established by Michigan election law. Challengers and poll watchers are required to wear masks that cover the nose and mouth to the extent medically able to do so consistent with the MDHHS order and maintain social distancing while not performing their legal duties.”

“Challengers and poll watchers should maintain at least six feet of distance between themselves and election workers and voters as reasonably possible. However, to the extent that it is necessary to temporarily stand in closer proximity to election workers, to have a challenge heard, to observe the poll book, or perform any other legal duty, challengers and poll watchers are permitted to do so, provided close personal interaction is as brief as possible,” the new directive continues.

“Once a challenge or necessary observation is complete, challengers and poll watchers should resume remaining six feet away from voters and poll workers,” the directive concludes. Gronda noted that the state would be entering into a binding written agreement with the plaintiffs.

The #DetroitLeaks revelations have prompted many Michigan patriots to insert themselves in the process to stop fraud by becoming poll challengers. Poll challengers are needed throughout the country, and more information can be found at DefendYourBallot.com about how to become a poll challenger in your state.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending