Connect with us

Tech

Facebook Caves, Pulls So-Called ‘Racist’ Trump Ad After Left-Wing Reporters Whine

Published

on

After facing backlash from left-wing reporters and cable news outlets, Facebook banned a GOP ad deemed to be “racist.”

“It is outrageous what the Democrats are doing to our Country. Vote Republican now!” Tweeted President Donald J. Trump on October 31, attaching an ad of illegal immigrant Luis Bracamontes laughing in court while being arraigned for murdering two California Sheriffs.

Trending: Mike Lee Passes Big Tech H-1B Visa Giveaway in Senate Without Objection

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Bracamontes vowed to the judge that he would kill more police officers if ever released, and expressed regret that he did not kill more before he was arrested.

Of course, the message of the advertisement was about illegal immigration, not the race of illegal aliens. But the mainstream press, which makes a pretty penny by finding racism where it doesn’t exist, thus sowing division among Americans, complained about the ad.

“NEW: Trump campaign Facebook ads are targeting voters in Florida and Arizona with that caravan ad that CNN deemed too racist to run,” said far-left activist and Daily Beast blogger Lachlan Markay.

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/1059466356641484801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1059466356641484801&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Ftech%2F2018%2F11%2F05%2Ffacebook-caves-to-left-wing-journalists-demanding-removal-of-trump-midterm-ad%2F

Shortly thereafter, Facebook caved to the pressure and banned the ad. According to Breitbart, the pretext for banning the ad was that it violated Facebook’s rules against “sensational content.” The tech giant told Breitbart: 

This ad violates Facebook’s advertising policy against sensational content so we are rejecting it. While the video is allowed to be posted on Facebook, it cannot receive paid distribution.

This ad violates Facebook’s polices against sensational content. Ads must not contain shocking, sensational, disrespectful or excessively violent content. This includes dehumanizing or denigrating entire groups of people and using frightening and exaggerated rumors of danger.

Ads must not contain shocking, sensational, disrespectful or excessively violent content.
Examples:

  • Images that may shock or scare viewers
  • Images that are scary, gory or sensational
  • Ads depicting violence or threats of violence

Inasmuch as cop killers are inherently scary, the ad did indeed violate Facebook’s terms of service. But that was the whole point of the ad: to highlight the threat posed by dangerous, unvetted illegal aliens pose to society. Apparently, that discussion is now out of bounds on Facebook.

Brad Parscale, Trump’s 2020 campaign manager was incensed by Facebook’s removal of the ad, describing Silicon Valley tech giants as the “Palo Alto Mafia.”

Once again, the media is working in cahoots with social media giants to silence conservatives.

Tech

Twitter Suspends Election Whistleblower After Giving Riveting Testimony in Arizona about Mathematical Fraud

This isn’t the first time.

Published

on

Throughout the day in Arizona, many credible whistleblowers have stepped forward to give testimony about the multitude of irregularities that occurred during the election.

One expert witness, Bobby Fiton, attested to mathematical fraud during the election that casts serious doubt on the vote totals as they are currently reported. He made a particularly powerful statement with regards to Gov. Doug Ducey, who certified the dubious vote while whistleblowers were going on the record.

“If I was an executive at a publicly-traded company, I would never sign that because I risk jailtime and having all my money taken from me in lawsuits,” he said.

“I would have never, ever certified. I would have rather resigned than certify those results… I believe they’re fraudulent based on the data,” Fiton continued.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“And my sister asked me a simple question this morning, she goes: ‘How sure are you?’ And my sister’s a pretty stubborn person like me, and I said: ‘I’d be willing to put my life on it.’ I’m that sure about the analysis assuming that the data that I got from the state and everything else was accurate,” he added.

A clip of Fiton’s testimony can be seen here:

Immediately after he issued his testimony, Fiton was banned on Twitter to prevent his analysis from being widely understood by the masses:

Twitter had previously done this to the personal account of state senator Doug Mastriano to stop his anti-fraud efforts from gaining momentum immediately after similar hearings were held in Pennsylvania last week.

“We move heaven and earth with American dollars to secure elections in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere. We can’t do it in our own state?” Mastriano said at the hearing. “There’s people in Pennsylvania not interested in safe, secure elections.”

Big League Politics has reported on Twitter’s assault on conservatives, which includes a recent hire of an extreme far-left activist as head of conversational safety:

The media company Protocol, a sister site of Politico, recently published an article about Twitter’s new “head of product for conversational safety,” Christine Su. It claims that Su, a “young, queer Asian-American businesswoman,” is revolutionizing what “user safety” on social media means.

Twitter hired Su around six months ago to be in charge of “what might be the most difficult task on Twitter,” despite having no apparent experience in politics, programming, and media relations. But Twitter seems to like her for her “creative” and “somewhat radical new ideas” about user safety.

“As a queer woman of color who is an Asian American in tech in rural America, that experience is a very intersectional one. I’ve had plenty of experiences moving through spaces where I wanted more safety,” Su said.

Protocol writes that Su’s vision incorporates “transformative and procedural justice.” Transformative justice ostensibly refers to a non-retributive form of repairing harm done to someone and preventing it from happening again; procedural justice to enacting a set of rules that “make harm rarer in the first place.”

This all sounds nice and dandy—but beware. So-called transformative and procedural justice will not benefit you, but will crush you. Anything that’s perceived as “harmful” against “women and people from marginalized groups” can and will be used to censor you. Christine Su may reassuringly claim that “the point is not to make the entire world a safe space,” but she’s open about the fact that she will help give the Coalition of the Fringes more control over what people are allowed to do and say on Twitter.

Big Tech has emerged as an existential threat to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. If they succeed in validating Biden’s electoral fraud, it will mean an end to America and a death sentence for Western Civilization.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending