A brave Facebook engineer wrote an internal memo criticizing the company for its intolerance towards conservative viewpoints, confirming the company’s leftwing bias.
“We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views,” said Brian Amerige in a post titled “We Have A Problem With Political Diversity.”
“We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views,” Amerige alleged. “We claim to welcome all perspectives, but are quick to attack—often in mobs—anyone who presents a view that appears to be in opposition to left-leaning ideology. We throw labels that end in *obe and *ist at each other, attacking each other’s character rather than their ideas.”
The memo is reminiscent of the one written by former Google employee James Damore, who criticized the internet giant for being an “ideological echo chamber.” Damore is politically neutral, but his memo turned him into a conservative folk hero.
Amerige bashed Facebook’s culture in a similar way – one where employees who might be hold political views right of Stalin are forced to shut up or risk losing their livelihood.
“We do this so consistently that employees are afraid to say anything when they disagree with what’s around them politically,” he wrote “HR has told me that this is not a rare concern, and I’ve personally gotten over a hundred messages to that effect. Your colleagues are afraid because they know that they — not their ideas — will be attacked. They know that all the talk of “openness to different perspectives” does not apply to causes of “social justice,” immigration, “diversity”, and “equality.” On this issues, you can either keep quiet or sacrifice your reputation and career.”
Amerige also revealed that Facebook employees often call for the removal of Silicon Valley titan Peter Thiel from removal of its board because he supported President Donald J. Trump, and that saying “All Lives Matter” is a fireable offense.
Just consider the gravity of that statement for a second.
“This is not okay,” Amerige continued. “Not just for our internal culture, but for our own viability as a company. While the problem isn’t unique to us, we are entrusted by a great part of the world to be impartial and transparent carriers of people’s stories, ideas, and commentary. Congress doesn’t think we can do this. The President doesn’t think we can do this. And like them or not, we deserve that criticism. We are blind to and dismissive of what people beyond our walls (let alone even within our walls) think about complex issues that matter. I’ve been here for nearly 6.5 years and this has gotten exponentially worse in the last 2.”
Twitter Posts Job Posting for Developing Paid Subscription Service; Will Platform Become Pay-to-Use?
Will it lead to the downfall of the platform?
Shares for Twitter’s stock surged more than 8% on Wednesday as the company posted an online job listing for a developer who would work on a new system designed as a pay-to-use platform.
The job listing advertises the opening for a project team termed “Gryphon.” The company describes the team as creating a “subscription platform” that “can be reused by other teams in the future.”
In a statement to CNN on the job listing, Twitter underplayed the announcement, stating that it was only a job listing, not a product announcement.
“We’re conducting this survey to assess the interest in a new, more enhanced version of Tweetdeck. We regularly conduct user research to gather feedback about people’s Twitter experience and to better inform our product investment decisions, and we’re exploring several ways to make Tweetdeck even more valuable for professionals.”
CEO Jack Dorsey has resisted shareholder demands to reorganize Twitter to prioritize profitability, most recently fending off a buyout attempt staged by oligarch Paul Singer challenging his leadership of the company. Dorsey kept his position of power over the company after reaching an agreement with profit-hungry shareholders, and the new development of paid subscription software could signal he intends to further satisfy them.
The company’s major investors will likely be pleased by any sign the company intends to convert its service into a pay-to-use model, evolving away from the tradition business model of micro-targeted ads towards its user base. However, a change to a subscription model could prove to be a threat to Twitter’s appeal, especially when newer free speech platforms are gunning for the platform’s user base and the company caves to the demands of censorious liberal journalists in suspending a variety of public figures deemed inconvenient to the neoliberal societal model.
Ultimately, the greed and thirst for power of the privileged elites of Silicon Valley could possibly bring about an end to their era of domination over online political speech, heralding a renaissance of the internet.
Violent Left3 days ago
ANTIFA Leader Complains That ‘Play Time is Over’ After Being Raided by FBI for Allegedly Leading Far-Left Riot
Violent Left3 days ago
10 Charged with Burglary in Looting of Milwaukee Sneaker Store
Violent Left2 days ago
Black Lives Matter Terrorists Cut Down 9/11 Memorial for Fallen Firefighters in New York
States1 day ago
23-Month-Old Boy Dies After Being Repeatedly Punched in the Face by Attacker in Chicago
Deplorables4 days ago
Mark McCloskey Sets the Record Straight, Identifies as Republican, Calls Black Lives Matter “Terrorist Organization”
Free Speech2 days ago
Prominent Leftists Sign Letter Deriding Cancel Culture, Now That It is Starting to Affect Them!
Big League Wellness2 days ago
Florida’s State Code Would Allow Authorities to Force Shots into Kids By Any Means Necessary
White House4 days ago
Attorney General Bill Barr Folds to the Mob, Claims There is Systemic Racism in Law Enforcement