Connect with us

Tech

Facebook Desperately Tries to Censor BLP Story on Nobel Prize Winner’s Claim That Coronavirus Was Made in a Lab

They are desperate to censor news about the potential origins of the coronavirus.

Published

on

Facebook’s fact checking gestapo has attacked original reporting published on Big League Politics yet again, as the Orwellian social media provider becomes desperate to restrict unauthorized information regarding coronavirus on their platform.

Big League Politics reported last week on the controversial claims from French Nobel Prize winning scientist Luc Montagnier, who admitted that the coronavirus came from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.

The factual report of the doctor’s claim (please note, Big League Politics did not present the claims as fact) can be read in part here:

Trending: WATCH: General Flynn SPEAKS OUT In First Interview Since Pardon: “President Trump Won This Election”

Montagnier told the French CNews channel and a podcast by Pourquoi Docteur that elements of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and elements of the “germ of malaria” make it clear that COVID-19 was created in a lab.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The Wuhan city laboratory has specialized in these coronaviruses since the early 2000s. They have expertise in this area,” Montagnier was quoted as saying.

Montagnier received the Nobel Prize for medicine in 2008 because he identified the AIDS virus alongside professor Franeoise Barre-Sinoussi. Montagnier’s willingness to admit certain inconvenient truths about coronavirus has earned him the scorn of his establishment colleagues. Despite his long-standing history of contributing to science, his peers want to destroy him for not surrendering to the official Chinese propaganda narrative pushed by groups like the World Health Organization.

“Just in case you don’t know. Dr Montagnier has been rolling downhill incredibly fast in the last few years. From baselessly defending homeopathy to becoming an antivaxxer. Whatever he says, just don’t believe him,” Juan Carlos Gabaldon wrote in a tweet.

In a desperate attempt to suppress this information and stop it from going viral, Facebook called the report “false” on their platform, even though BLP was merely reporting the claims of an iconic scientist with the courage to speak against the China-approved narrative.

Hilariously, the so-called fact checker was even forced to admit that the BLP article was factually accurate in its critique of the story.

“The only thing accurate about these articles is that Nobel Prize winner and virologist Luc Montagnier did in fact make these claims,” they wrote.

The so-called fact checker claims that “articles which repeat Montagnier’s claims without critically evaluating their veracity exhibit the common “appeal to authority” fallacy, in which something is assumed to be true simply because the person saying it is considered to be an expert.”

However, Montagnier is far from the only expert that believes coronavirus was likely created in a laboratory by Chinese mad scientists. Renowned expert Richard H. Ebright has corroborated these types of claims and called for serious inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus.

“A denial is not a refutation,” Ebright said in reference to Chinese virologist Shi Zhengli, who works at the research lab in Wuhan that is believed by many to be behind the coronavirus outbreak.

Ebright also praised Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) in a Twitter post for calling attention to how the Chinese likely created this entire crisis.

Facebook only draws attention to the conspiracy by desperately trying to control information on their monopoly platform. Their latest Orwellian “fact check” against BLP just shows that we are a serious threat to their thought-control operation.

Free Speech

YOUR NEW MASTER: Twitter’s Head of Conversational Safety, a “Young, Queer Asian-American Businesswoman,” is “Rethinking” the Concept of User Safety

Do you trust someone like her to make Twitter “a safer place”?

Published

on

The media company Protocol, a sister site of Politico, recently published an article about Twitter’s new “head of product for conversational safety,” Christine Su. It claims that Su, a “young, queer Asian-American businesswoman,” is revolutionizing what “user safety” on social media means.

Twitter hired Su around six months ago to be in charge of “what might be the most difficult task on Twitter,” despite having no apparent experience in politics, programming, and media relations. But Twitter seems to like her for her “creative” and “somewhat radical new ideas” about user safety.

“As a queer woman of color who is an Asian American in tech in rural America, that experience is a very intersectional one. I’ve had plenty of experiences moving through spaces where I wanted more safety,” Su said.

Protocol writes that Su’s vision incorporates “transformative and procedural justice.” Transformative justice ostensibly refers to a non-retributive form of repairing harm done to someone and preventing it from happening again; procedural justice to enacting a set of rules that “make harm rarer in the first place.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This all sounds nice and dandy—but beware. So-called transformative and procedural justice will not benefit you, but will crush you. Anything that’s perceived as “harmful” against “women and people from marginalized groups” can and will be used to censor you. Christine Su may reassuringly claim that “the point is not to make the entire world a safe space,” but she’s open about the fact that she will help give the Coalition of the Fringes more control over what people are allowed to do and say on Twitter.

Examples from the article:

  • Creating an audio hangout feature called “Spaces,” which will allow users to determine who is allowed to participate, as well as who can speak and when. (Note that it’s being tested on “women and marginalized groups of people” first.)
  • Potentially doubling down on functions that “encourage people to read content before reposting it.” (Which is exclusively done to censor or limit the reach of conservative and other right-wing content.)
  • Building tools that “create private pathways for apologies, forgiveness and deescalation.” (The finer details are still a work in progress according to Su.)
  • Defining what a “meaningful conversation” is. (Would people like Su think that anything right-wingers say or believe belongs in a “meaningful conversation”? Let’s just say I wouldn’t bet money on it…)

You know full well that a company like Facebook would shortly follow suit. After all, it’s not just Twitter that Su is “revolutionizing,” but the concept of social media itself. Figure out where all this is heading.

Now is as good a time as ever to plug our Parler:

Follow Big League Politics on Parler: @BigLeaguePol

Follow Evan James on Parler: @CatholicEJames

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending