Connect with us

News

Facebook Tries to Do Damage Control Regarding Project Veritas Video

Published

on

Leslie Brown, the woman who was featured in a Project Veritas video on June 25, 2020, was fired according to a text message that Project Veritas CEO James O’Keefe received.

Brown was a senior HR executive who was fired hours after the video was released.

Trending: Nebraska Small Business Owner Commits Suicide After Being Railroaded With Manslaughter For Defending His Bar From Criminal Rioters

Brown, the senior HR executive claimed she had been fired just hours after the video debuted. Brown also updated her connection with the Big Tech titan, by changing her employer on her LinkedIn page from Facebook to US Tech Solutions, a company that sub-contracts for Facebook.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Brown had an exchange with a journalist about the situation:

Journalist: I mean, they were able to fire him without having to worry about discrimination.

Brown: Due diligence, right. Because he’s a white man. Yeah, white man. No problem. You can’t do it that easily if there are other issues.

Journalist: Oh, it’s easier when they’re-          

Brown: White men.  

Journalist: Yeah, no protected class.

Brown: No one has the white man’s back anymore.

US Tech Solutions informed Project Veritas that only the client (Facebook) is able to make decisions to hire and fire people..

“Any contractor hiring/termination is confidential information and we cannot comment to a third party on it. We will be happy to respond to Leslie directly if she has any questions about her temp assignment with US Tech,” stated Manoj Agrawal, CEO of US Tech Solutions.

In the midst of all of this, a woman named Heather King participated on a Facebook promoted call with Congressional staff to talk about potential election meddling.

King made several remarks about the censorship of political posts by its content moderators, which Project Veritas insiders have long documented. She believes that these actions were not consistent with the company’s policies.

“With regards to a question related to Project Veritas report. First off is that our reviewers work hard to keep our tack on space for end users every day,” stated the spokeswoman, who currently works with Facebook’s political team based in Washington. “We will be reviewing our training and oversight to make sure that we think about policy and we’re watching our partners to make sure that they’re appropriately and properly following our policies.”

The spokeswoman also claimed that Facebook reviews its reviewers.

“Reviewers’ decisions are regularly evaluated, ensure our policies are applied fairly and accurately, not promote any political viewpoint of any stripe and the comments included in this video are not consistent with our policies.”

Despite Facebook talking a big game about promoting free speech, their actions tell a different story, which O’Keefe has noted.

“Our insiders recorded Facebook moderators in Tampa and Phoenix saying they would take a bounty from Iran to kill the president and deleting every post with a MAGA hat and labelling it terrorism,” said O’Keefe.

“Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Congress under oath that Facebook does not censor political speech, but we proves that Facebook does censor political speech—and screenshots of Facebook policy directives, which categorize hate speech that should be taken down by their own policies as political speech, when it is aligned with Facebook’s political agenda,” he said.

Big Tech is in the tank for the Deep State and is doing everything it can to influence the 2020 elections.

Conservatives will need to think about long-term alternatives and other methods to get their message across without the use of traditional social media outlets. In addition, they will need to push for certain reforms that change the regulatory framework of social media as well as getting thorough audits of these organizations to understand what they’re truly up to.

Globalists can rest well knowing that Big Tech is more than willing to do their bidding.

News

Southern Baptist Convention Reverses Course on Name Change After BLP Reporting

They say they’re not changing their name.

Published

on

The Southern Baptist Convention has sought to dispel reporting from Big League Politics on the organization’s planned name change, arguing that the institution isn’t formally changing its name.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But a close look at the American Christian church’s plans relating to its name reveal that it’s played with the idea far more seriously than they’re making it seem.

Reports of a name change first emerged in a Washington Post article published on Tuesday. SBC President JD Greear told the Post that “hundreds of churches” affiliated with the denomination had “committed” to using the phrase “Great Commission Baptist” as an alternative to the denomination’s longtime moniker. The change would come as Greear touts his support of the Black Lives Matter, although he’s been careful in pointing out he doesn’t support any formal organization related to the movement. Greear also is renaming the church he personally pastors with the term.

The SBC’s 2021 convention will also organize under the motto of “We Are Great Commission Baptists.” Sounds a lot like a name change, even if the SBC’s leadership is steadfastly maintaining it isn’t.

The name ‘Great Commission Baptist’ is theologically sound in the Christian religion, but it’s somewhat questionable that the organization’s leader appears to be emphasizing it at a moment in which political correctness is making its entryism into many Christian churches and organizations.

It seems as if the organization’s figurehead is keen to present himself as a liberal-style suburban Evangelical to the Washington Post, but he changed his tune quite quickly when the rank and file membership of Southern Baptist churches learned that he was promoting the idea of a name change.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending