Tech
Fake News Debunked: Senate Intel Report Found NO EVIDENCE Russia Hacked the Vote in 2016
The anti-Trump propagandists are desperate to keep this conspiracy theory going.
A newly-invented Russophobic trope that has circulated throughout the fake news over the past week is the notion that Russia hacked all 50 states during the 2016 election cycle based off of the findings in a Senate Intelligence report, implying that their interference was the reason Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
News entities such as the New York Times, Esquire, PBS NewsHour, CNet, Daily Beast, Yahoo News, and many others have ran misleading headlines to gin up the Russian threat. Some have claimed that Russians “hacked” all 50 states, others say they “targeted” all 50 states, but the narrative is clear: Be very, very afraid of the evil Rooskies, and their threatening behavior against our democracy.
Left-wing journalist Michael Tracey, who is one of the few liberals with the courage to speak truth to power regarding the Russian collusion hoax, cited the report itself to expose the dirty tricks of the smear merchants in a series of tweets.
Senate Intel report found “no evidence that vote tallies were altered or that voter registry files were deleted or modified” yet the big headline was that Russia “hacked all 50 states” — weird pic.twitter.com/vypfXHDSPy
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 28, 2019
Some headlines used the phrasing that Russia “targeted” all 50 states. Of course “targeting” is an amorphous weasel word. Some of this “targeting” included simple, routine “scanning” of public-facing websites, which states only noticed after the Feds issued a panicked warning pic.twitter.com/srCpCZSI8U
take our poll - story continues belowCompleting this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 28, 2019
NYT and others blared the headline, “All 50 states were targeted by Russia in 2016,” but this state says “they have seen no evidence of scanning or attack attempts related to state-wide election infrastructure in 2016.” Did anyone even bother to read the report? pic.twitter.com/ViATryNoWd
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 28, 2019
The “targeting” that we’re all supposed to be up-in-arms about consisted of “pinging” public websites, which happens constantly all day everyday. That’s why local officials barely took note of it. Only after the “Russian interference” narrative was introduced did anyone care pic.twitter.com/YzB1cAGuop
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 28, 2019
Of course huge sections of the report are redacted so we may never know what this mysterious “unexplained event” was ???? pic.twitter.com/sdrM0juk8c
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 29, 2019
In one instance, a malware “attack” initially assumed to be the Russian government was later assessed to be non-Russian criminal activity. This stuff, like so much else with the broader Russia narrative, is confirmation bias run amok pic.twitter.com/4GDubFXgLT
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) July 29, 2019
Director of the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Christopher Krebs dismissed the alleged threat while appearing on Capitol Hill in 2017.
DHS cyber chief Christopher Krebs on Russian “attacks” in 2017: “Scanning happens all the time it’s happening right now to a number of probably — your websites. Scanning is a regular activity across the web. I would not characterize that as an attack” https://t.co/7WqAifAk4J
— Paul Surovell (@paulsurovell) July 28, 2019
Once again, the fake news is relying on the ignorance of the public to create false perceptions about the threat Russia poses to our democratic elections. Meanwhile, Google executives are being caught bragging about how they plan to manipulate their algorithms to prevent the re-election of Trump in 2020.
If there is a real threat to electoral integrity in the United States, it is coming from Big Tech not Russian autocrat Vladimir Putin.
Tech
Twitter Posts Job Posting for Developing Paid Subscription Service; Will Platform Become Pay-to-Use?
Will it lead to the downfall of the platform?
Shares for Twitter’s stock surged more than 8% on Wednesday as the company posted an online job listing for a developer who would work on a new system designed as a pay-to-use platform.
The job listing advertises the opening for a project team termed “Gryphon.” The company describes the team as creating a “subscription platform” that “can be reused by other teams in the future.”
In a statement to CNN on the job listing, Twitter underplayed the announcement, stating that it was only a job listing, not a product announcement.
“We’re conducting this survey to assess the interest in a new, more enhanced version of Tweetdeck. We regularly conduct user research to gather feedback about people’s Twitter experience and to better inform our product investment decisions, and we’re exploring several ways to make Tweetdeck even more valuable for professionals.”
CEO Jack Dorsey has resisted shareholder demands to reorganize Twitter to prioritize profitability, most recently fending off a buyout attempt staged by oligarch Paul Singer challenging his leadership of the company. Dorsey kept his position of power over the company after reaching an agreement with profit-hungry shareholders, and the new development of paid subscription software could signal he intends to further satisfy them.
The company’s major investors will likely be pleased by any sign the company intends to convert its service into a pay-to-use model, evolving away from the tradition business model of micro-targeted ads towards its user base. However, a change to a subscription model could prove to be a threat to Twitter’s appeal, especially when newer free speech platforms are gunning for the platform’s user base and the company caves to the demands of censorious liberal journalists in suspending a variety of public figures deemed inconvenient to the neoliberal societal model.
Ultimately, the greed and thirst for power of the privileged elites of Silicon Valley could possibly bring about an end to their era of domination over online political speech, heralding a renaissance of the internet.
-
News3 days agoTennessee’s Marsha Blackburn Calls on Ilhan Omar to Resign After Minnesota Democrat Calls to “Dismantle” U.S. “System of Oppression”
-
Snowflakes3 days agoEXPOSED: City of Seattle Forces White Employees to Undergo Marxist Re-Education Training
-
Big League Guns4 days agoPregnant White Woman Charged with 4-Year Felony for Using Firearm to Fend Off After Being Harassed by Black Women
-
Violent Left4 days agoSeven ANTIFA Militants Facing Federal Charges for Attack on Portland Courthouse
-
Congress3 days agoHouse Democrats Seeking to Restrict Attorney General Bill Barr From Any Travel Outside DC
-
Culture3 days agoActivists Change ‘Black Lives Matter’ Street Mural in Chicago to Read ‘All Lives Matter’
-
Border Security4 days agoPresident Trump Preparing New Executive Order to Rescind DACA Amnesty After SCOTUS Decision
-
News4 days agoNASCAR Fraud Bubba “Smollet” Wallace Cashes Out on Noose Hoax, Lands Huge Endorsement Deal with Beats by Dre
