Connect with us

Fake News Media

Fake News Peddling Vice Pays $1.87 Million to Settle ‘Female Pay Gap’ Lawsuit

The far left media company potentially saved millions by settling the suit.

Published

on

Vice News Equal Pay

Vice Media settled for almost $2 million after several former employees sued the progressive company, alleging that they paid women less than men with similar jobs and work experience.

Hollywood Reporter reports that, according to the suit, Vice Media paid women less than men with comparable skill sets and job duties because they determined salary based on each employee’s previous work history. The suit also claims that men would be more likely to advance in the company, and receive even higher pay, than their female counterparts.

For its part, Vice News claims the company had no institutionalized or centralized practice to pay women less than men, and the several former employees who banded together to sue the platform were simply anomalies in the company’s otherwise progressive hiring practices.

Trending: Snopes Covers for Bill Gates’ Wife for Wearing Satanic Inverted Cross During Media Appearance

Vice Media provided the courts information regarding its salaries dating back to 2012, which the plaintiffs’ legal team used to determine that “when controlling for job family/level, tenure, and work location, the amount of underpaid wages to female employees appeared to range between $7,000,000 and $9,740,000,” Hollywood Reporter notes, according to the motion to settle.

take our poll - story continues below

LOCKDOWN POLL: Should America reopen for business?

  • 🔒LOCKDOWN POLL🔒 Should America reopen for business? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The decision to settle the lawsuit could have potentially saved Vice Media millions of dollars, according to the report.

Ironically, Vice News has published several reports claiming equal pay is a severe threat to the United States, including an article published a year ago titled “Trump is letting companies get away with paying women less than men”. It is not known how or if President Donald J. Trump somehow holds sway over Vice News.

It should be noted that Vice News is not particularly well known for its accurate reporting. Last year the far left media company described President Trump’s former campaign manager Roger Stone, Infowars host Alex Jones, and new media personality Milo Yiannopoulos as “white supremacists.” This error was particularly comedic considering Stone is married to an Hispanic woman, Jones’ first wife was Jewish, and Yiannopoulos is in a homosexual marriage with a black man.

Fake News Media

VILE: New York Times Claims U.S. Military ‘Celebrates White Supremacy’ on Memorial Day

The fake news hates America.

Published

on

To commemorate Memorial Day, the New York Times published an op/ed claiming that the U.S. military celebrates white supremacy.

The op/ed was signed by the entire editorial board of the Times, showing how this view is ubiquitous among everyone on the fake news rag. They argue that the U.S. military celebrates white supremacy because they have not sufficiently pissed on the graves of ancestors deemed to be racist by Cultural Marxists.

The editorial board claims that “innocent intentions cannot obscure the truth that secessionists embarked on the Civil War to guarantee the rights of some human beings to own others, or the fact that the Confederate banner represents the same white supremacist values as — and is often displayed in tandem with — the Nazi swastika.”

They are pushing for the U.S. military to rename their bases that are named after Confederate generals, as the leftists march to degrade American culture in their relentless push to transform the nation.

take our poll - story continues below

LOCKDOWN POLL: Should America reopen for business?

  • 🔒LOCKDOWN POLL🔒 Should America reopen for business? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“This same toxic legacy clings to the 10 United States military installations across the South that were named for Confederate Army officers during the first half of the 20th century,” the Times editorial board wrote.

“Apologists often describe the names as a necessary gesture of reconciliation in the wake of the Civil War. In truth, the namings reflect a federal embrace of white supremacy that found its most poisonous expression in military installations where black servicemen were deliberately placed under the command of white Southerners — who were said to better “understand” Negroes — and confined to substandard housing, segregated transportation systems and even “colored only” seating in movie houses,” they added.

The cultural genocide is not just extended to Confederate ancestors, but also to the Founding Fathers as well. The Times has pushed revisionist anti-American history through the 1619 Project, which has stated blatantly false claims about America seceding from the British to protect the institute of slavery.

Big League Politics has reported about how the Left is coming after all symbols honoring American heritage and the founding-era revolutionaries who put their lives on the line to establish liberty:

After a San Francisco school board voted to paint over a mural depicting the life of George Washington, over 500 academics signed an open letter urging the board to reverse course.

This decision was made after accusations of the mural traumatizing students and glorifying “slavery, genocide, colonization, manifest destiny, white supremacy, oppression.” USA Today reported that hundreds of educators are protesting this decision, calling it a “gross violation of logic” as the mural actually represents “a significant monument of anti-racism.”

The mural was created by Russian-American painter Victor Arnautoff in 1936, according to a report from the Richmond District Blog. Some of the mural’s images were attacked during the civil rights movement over its portrayal of slavery and Native Americans…

Rachael Z. DeLue, an Art History and American Studies professor at Princeton University, told USA Today that the mural shouldn’t be removed:

“If we cover it up and we whitewash it, not only are we doing a disservice to history, but we’re also doing a disservice to those who suffered at the hands of European-descended Americans: slaves and Native Americans who were traumatized and killed.”

DeLue added, “It’s also the case that this isn’t simply of the past. The legacies of slavery and federal policy about Native Americans live on in the present.”

Paul Von Blum, a senior lecturer in African American studies and communications studies at University of California, Los Angeles, suggested that students become more mentally tough.

“I know it causes students to cringe, but that’s the function of art,” Von Blum said to USA Today. “And art should never be censored.”

The New York Times openly hates America and wants the nation to be destroyed and its people to be subjugated. The fake news is the enemy of the people.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending