The fake news media (read: enemies of the American people) rushed to debunk then-candidate Donald J. Trump’s claim that the FBI could not possibly have reviewed all of Anthony Weiner’s 650,000 plus emails in eight days, only to be proven wrong nearly two years later.
“You can’t review 650,000 emails in eight days,” Trump said at a November 7, 2016 campaign rally in reference to the emails obtained from Weiner’s laptop as part of the Clinton email scandal.
Real Clear Investigations put together a timeline of the Clinton/Weiner probe in the context of all that has been revealed about the anti-Trump bias at the highest level of American law enforcement.
“Sept. 26 – New York FBI agents investigating sex crimes allegations against Weiner discover “a large volume of emails,” including long-sought BlackBerry messages, related to Clinton on a laptop used by Abedin and her husband. The number of potentially relevant emails would total 694,000 – or more than 10 times the number that were thought to have existed in the initial Clinton probe,” the timeline says.
Disgraced former FBI Directed James Comey then re-opened the Clinton email probe in late October, only to close it eight days later without changing hiss conclusion.
Trump never bought the story, publicly blasting the FBI for its cursory work.
But as usual, the DNC lackeys in the mainstream press played ball for Clinton and company, explaining away Trump’s claim that the feds could not possibly have looked at so many emails in such a short period of time.
The critique seems to imply that the FBI would have had to review each of the emails individually, perhaps even manually, in order to home in on the ones pertinent to the Clinton investigation. But as numerous information technology and computer security experts have pointed out, there are at least two very simple steps that could automatically filter a huge batch of emails down to a far smaller number. First, you could filter them by address to weed out those that were neither sent to or from Clinton, or the associates who used her private server. Second, you could search their Message-ID headers to identify those that are simply duplicates of emails the FBI had already obtained elsewhere.
That never happened. We know now that the FBI never even looked.
“How the F.B.I. Reviewed Thousands of Emails in One Week,” a New York Times article said.
“Out of hundreds of thousands of emails seized last month from disgraced former Representative Anthony D. Weiner, a substantial number turned out to be copies of documents already reviewed by F.B.I. agents and analysts, allowing the agency to wrap up in days a review that some had feared would take weeks, if not longer,” according to Adam Goldman and Matt Apuzzo.
A CBS News report headlined “How The FBI Might Have Processed 650,000 Emails in Clinton Probe,” cited a “forensics expert” to prove their bogus claim.
“This is not rocket science,” Jonathan Zdziarski, a forensics expert who’s consulted for law enforcement, told Wired. “Eight days is more than enough time to pull this off in a responsible way.”
Hear that, America? It’s not rocket science! Trump must be wrong!
And then of course, the mother of all explanations for the quick turnaround came from Comey himself.
The FBI was able to sort through all the emails “thanks to the wizardry of our technology,” he said before Congress.
The mainstream press, once again, is caught carrying water for the anti-Trump crowd, including corrupt high-level bad actors in the FBI, and the Trump-hating DNC.
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Liberal Media Freaks Out as Tom Cotton Questions Coronavirus Origins
Mainstream media seems more concerned with Cotton’s questions than China’s censorship.
Mainstream media entities are claiming Republican Senator Tom Cotton is trafficking in “conspiracy theories” for questioning the source of the coronavirus’ origins.
Cotton has questioned the official narrative stating that the deadly coronavirus outbreak originated in a wet food market in Wuhan, China. He’s suggested that it’s possible the disease originated in a Chinese government “superlab” a few miles away that conducts research in human infectious diseases.
Cotton has pointed out that the Chinese government is consistently declining offers of scientific and medical aid to combat the lethal epidemic, raising suspicions as to their transparency.
Such a suggestion is enough to label Cotton a “conspiracy theorist” in the eyes of outlets such as Slate and the New York Times. A headline from the Times called Cotton’s question a “fringe theory,” even though Cotton references epidemiologists who believe the virus didn’t originally enter human transmission at the food market. The Washington Post also ran a story Monday claiming that Cotton is trafficking in conspiracy theories.
It’s remarkable that nominally respectable media entities such as the New York Times are quick to dismiss entirely plausible theories of the coronavirus’s origins. If anything, an official narrative on the virus’s origins from the authoritarian communist government of China should be treated with inherent skepticism, especially considering that China is widely suspected of covering up the gravity of the situation and even arresting reporters who seek to document the epidemic and the government’s response.
Certainly it’s possible that the disease spread into humans from the consumption of animals such as bats, a prevailing theory for the virus’s origins. But the general public has no reason to entirely discount any plausible theory for the origins of the virus.
Violent Left4 days ago
Bernie Sanders Supporter Who Attempted to Burn Down GOP County Headquarters Walks Out of Jail
News4 days ago
Crazy Lady Punches Former Police Officer at a Bar for Wearing MAGA-style Birthday Hat
Culture4 days ago
Homosexual Cop Gets $10 Million Taxpayer Payout Because He Did Not Receive a Promotion
News3 days ago
Bernie Sanders 2020 ‘Win’ in NH Netted a LOSS OF 80,000 VOTES from 2016
News3 days ago
Virginia State Police are Silent About Door-to-Door Enforcement of Suppressor Ban
Violent Left2 days ago
New Mexico Bureaucrat Arrested for Vandalizing State GOP Headquarters
Tech3 days ago
More Censorship: Controversial Right-Wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes is Booted From Platform, Even Ben Shapiro Says It’s Too Far
Violent Left3 days ago
New Hampshire Thug Arrested After Assaulting ‘MAGA’ Hat-Wearing 15-Year Old at Polling Site
Deep State3 days ago
Bill Barr Pushes Back Against Trump, Criticizes President’s Comments on Stone, Drops Case Against McCabe
Violent Left3 days ago
Wife of ‘Proud Boys’ Member Imprisoned for Self-Defense Pleads for Help for Their Three Children
News2 days ago
MS-13 Thug Gets Life Sentence in Virginia for Rape and Abduction
Culture2 days ago
How Vulture Capitalists Use Their Ill-Gotten Gains to Push Transgenderism Onto Children