Earlier today, U.S. District Judge Linda Parker dismissed a Michigan vote fraud lawsuit filed by attorney Sidney Powell while spitting in the face of every whistleblower who has bravely emerged to expose the grotesque cheating that occurred in the city of Detroit and other Democrat-dominated inner city slums on election day.
Parker dismissed Powell’s lawsuit on Monday as a “an amalgamation of theories, conjecture, and speculation,” and opined that investigating voter fraud cannot be done because it would undermine “faith in the democratic process.”
“For these reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiffs are far from likely to succeed in this matter,” she wrote in her conclusion.
It should come as no surprise that Parker is a far-left Obama appointee to the bench who has derided police, supported affirmative action, and served as the head of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission.
While she led the civil rights commission, Parker was a favorite of the far-left American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU spends most of their time working to make Christians second class citizens in their own country while largely ignoring coronavirus lockdowns and other real threats to civil liberties.
“I was thrilled when the Governor appointed Linda Parker to head the agency. Linda has been a staunch civil rights advocate throughout her career. She led an effort to put the right against racial profiling, for example, at the top of the agenda of the law enforcement community when she was at the Justice Department,” said Kary L. Moss, Executive Director of the ACLU of Michigan.
“She is providing vision and direction to the agency and will position it so that it can meet the needs of Michigan citizens for generations to come,” she added.
Parker has also been a long-time proponent of affirmative action, favoring public policy that would punish one ethnic group at the behest of another. When dozens of senators refused to confirm her nomination to the federal bench because of her history of radicalism, she touted it as some sort of achievement.
“I know that I did not get a 99 and 0 vote. There were four from Michigan who were nominated and the three excluding me got through with like a 97 to 0. But I had 37 people voting no,” Parker said. “And I got so many text messages from the civil rights community saying to wear those 37 no votes with honor. It would have been very troubling if you got through with unanimous support… Let me be very clear that my civil rights background was a problem for the US Senate.”
Parker even attempted to overturn Proposition 2, which was approved by Michigan voters in 2006. Proposition 2 effectively banned affirmative action in the state. Parker attempted to overthrow the decision by the people, literally opposing democracy because she did not get her way, but was ultimately rebuked by the Supreme Court. She made it clear that she will never let the pesky voice of the people get in the way of enacting her extreme left-wing agenda.
“The finding in that case was that Proposal 2, the voice of the people, that has to stand, as raggedy as that ballot initiative process was,” Judge Parker said. “The bottom line was the Supreme Court found that the bottom line was the Supreme Court found that the people had spoken so they could not overturn the vote of the people. So there is more work to be done,” she said.
“It was a good fight and a very revealing time in Michigan… I think we had more conversations about racial justice, about equality, about equality for women too because it was not obviously just a situation dealing with people of color, it was also dealing with women,” Parker added.
She also whined about law enforcement’s response to black crime, claiming that police are guilty of “overt racism” because of “under-representation of individuals of color on the police force in Ferguson,” the Missouri city where black thug Michael Brown was shot dead after reportedly attacking a white cop, which resulted in riots and looting in 2014. This was the genesis of the Black Lives Matter movement, which has evolved into an existential threat to civil society.
Dan Crenshaw White Knights for Liz Cheney After Republicans Blast Her Support for Trump’s Second Impeachment
Birds of a feather flock together.
Liz Cheney, daughter of Dick, was one of ten GOP House members to vote “yes” on President Donald Trump’s unprecedented second impeachment. Then when some were calling on Cheney to resign over her disgraceful vote, Dan Crenshaw, who voted against impeachment, quickly came to her defense and announced his “full support” for her.
“Let’s get some truth on the record: @Liz_Cheney has a hell of a lot more backbone than most, & is a principled leader with a fierce intellect,” Crenshaw tweeted Wednesday afternoon. “She will continue to be a much needed leader in the conference, with my full support.”
“We can disagree without tearing each other apart,” he added.
Let’s get some truth on the record: @Liz_Cheney has a hell of a lot more backbone than most, & is a principled leader with a fierce intellect. She will continue to be a much needed leader in the conference, with my full support.
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) January 13, 2021
Crenshaw himself was then roundly criticized in the replies to his tweet.
The people of Wyoming can do better than Liz Cheney, like the people of Texas can do better than you
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) January 13, 2021
I wish SNL never mocked you, because then you'd just be some un-known RINO, but unfortunately they made you a star.
— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) January 13, 2021
Really thought you were the man. Much respect for your service and sacrifice, but if you are part of the GOP trying to purge the party of Trumpism. Count me out. I can’t handle more Romney n McCain candidates
— Andrew Sean (@aehoosierdaddy) January 13, 2021
So sad. Turns out your just another politician. You’re right about disagreeing. You’ll see it at the ballot box next election how we can peacefully disagree.
— Rhonda Mc (Parler @rkmcsp) (@rkm_64) January 13, 2021
Cheney’s vote comes as no surprise. Big League Politics reported on her recent statement in support of Trump’s second impeachment, part of which read: “There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution. I will vote to impeach the President.” For this CNN laughably called her the “conscience of Republicans.”
Read More: No, Liz Cheney is Not the Future of the GOP
As the old saying goes, “birds of a feather flock together.” Dan Crenshaw and Liz Cheney most certainly do not represent the future of the GOP.
Politics2 days ago
GOP Establishment Threatens President Trump with Impeachment Unless He Denies Election Fraud
Big League National Security2 days ago
DNI Ratcliffe: China Interfered in 2020 Election, CIA Suppressed Info
Around The World4 days ago
Norway Turns Against Dangerous COVID-19 Vaccines, Warns ‘Very Frail’ People Should Not Take the Shots
Politics20 hours ago
Constituents Already Beginning to Turn on Peter Meijer, Who Admits That Voting to Impeach Trump May Have Ruined His Political Career
News3 days ago
Fox News Ratings Crater, Trailing CNN and MSNBC for First Time in 21 Years
Tech4 days ago
President Trump’s Facebook Page is Reactivated
Politics4 days ago
SURRENDER: ‘American Thinker’ Discredits Their Own Writing Staff to Appease Dominion Voting Systems
Big League Wellness3 days ago
As Trump Leaves Office, Media Cites Ineffectiveness of Lockdowns and Democratic Leaders Display Eagerness to Reopen