Connect with us

Fake News Media

America First Victory at Fox: Judge Jeanine to Return to Fox After Questioning Islam, Sharia

The formerly conservative news network caved to the massive outcry to allow Judge Jeanine to return.

Published

on

Jeanine Pirro Returns Fox News

During a conversation with President Donald J. Trump, Fox News host Sean Hannity confirmed Judge Jeanine Pirro’s program will return to its lineup this Saturday after the network weathered weeks of conservative backlash.

As President Trump thanked news personalities who were fair to him during the media’s two year disinformation campaign surrounding the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory, he mentioned Pirro by name, saying he hoped she would return to the network, telling Hannity, “I hope she’ll be back soon.”

This prompted Hannity to respond immediately, “She’s back Saturday.”

Fox News infamously negotiated with the terrorist-affiliated Council on American Islamic Relations in its decision to suspend Pirro’s show from its lineup for the last two weeks, after the host correctly questioned whether antisemitic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar could uphold the U.S. Constitution while appearing to believe in Sharia Law.

Big League Politics reported:

Despite the claims of many Muslim women that it is “their choice” to wear a hijab, the truth of the matter is that according to Sharia —the “Sacred Path of Islam”, wearing head coverings for women is “Obligatory” in most of the Muslim world.

In Chapter “w” Section 23 of “Reliance of the Traveller”—the sharia manual for Muslims, it states that the hijab is obligatory under Sharia. “A woman must not reveal anything except her hands and her face when outside the home and on the street.”

In other words, Pirro was speaking the truth and nothing but the truth.

Following the segment, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) wrote a letter to Fox News, calling for Pirro to be fired for what they called “Islamophobia”.

Since Pirro’s suspension, Big League Politics also broke the bombshell story that Fox News’s Shepard Smith stands accused of sexually assaulting another man, allegedly groping him and kissing him against his will while the man was drunkenly sleeping in Smith’s spare bedroom.

Fox News has refused to suspend the anti-Trump show host even as a petition calling for his removal from the network continues to gain steam.

Apparently sexual assault allegations are fine, so long as the show host does not question Sharia Law.

Fake News Media

PATHETIC: Reason Magazine Calls Proud Boys ‘White Nationalist’ and Criticizes President Trump for Not Condemning Them

Reason Magazine lies again.

Published

on

The smear merchants are out in full force after President Donald Trump refused to condemn the Proud Boys at the first presidential debate on Tuesday night.

The controversial clip can be seen here:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Although President Trump said he would disavow white supremacist groups, he would not disavow the Proud Boys, who are led by a dark-skinned Cuban man, or militia forces, who have defended property when cops were ordered not to do so in left-wing sustained riot situations.

Perhaps the most pathetic attack against President Trump comes from Reason Magazine, the globalist propaganda rag funded by the Koch network. Reason associate editor Scott Shackford lied about the Proud Boys, calling them a “white nationalist” group, and lied about President Trump, implying that he refused to disavow white supremacy, in his cheap smear piece.

“Trump still, unlike Biden, seems unable to repudiate violence from people who support him,” Shackford wrote.

Reason was immediately taken to task by their own libertarian-leaning fan base, who may not support President Trump but aren’t willing to accept blatantly false propaganda about the man.

“The Proud Boys are not “white nationalists.” Why lead with something so demonstrably untrue?” wrote commenter Geiger Goldstaedt.

“Given that they welcome people of color into their group and have zero white nationalist causes. I will take a person’s word for it whether they are white nationalist. It’s not exactly a cause that’s easy to stumble into,” wrote Ben of Houston.

“Reason’s race-baiting false witness is a sin and malignant societal cancer. They are scum,” buybuydandavis wrote.

They were similarly eviscerated on social media:

Big League Politics has reported on how Proud Boys have done nothing wrong except support Trump and defend themselves against ANTIFA terrorists. Group members have paid a steep price for their patriotic activity:

Two “Proud Boys” members were sentenced to four years in prison by a Manhattan judge on Tuesday after they defended themselves against ANTIFA terrorists who attacked a New York event featuring their leader, Gavin McInnes, over a year ago.

Big League Politics covered the scene last year when ANTIFA terrorists defaced the Metropolitan Republican Club (MET) in an attempt to threaten the organizers into canceling the event the day before it was scheduled to commence. They threatened to return and use violence if the MET went on with the event.

When the MET refused to bow to the will of the domestic terrorists, ANTIFA showed up yet again and provoked event attendees with violence…

In the aftermath, ANTIFA terrorists escaped charges while examples were made out of the Proud Boys. The fake news media invented a narrative that the Proud Boys were the provocateurs, which was seized upon by liberal city and state officials, and the result was a show trial where two Proud Boys ended up being convicted and sentenced to prison terms for self-defense.

Maxwell Hare, 27, and John Kinsman, 40, were each sentenced to four years in prison by Justice Mark Dwyer, who made clear in his remarks that his ruling was meant to send a political message.

“It’s a shame when some people jump up and down on a platform,” Dwyer said, referring to McInnes, “and their followers, their soldiers, get into trouble.”

“I’m not sure the most moral responsibility belongs to these two defendants,” he added.

Dwyer also made a thinly-veiled reference comparing the Proud Boys to Nazi streetfighters in 1930s Germany.

“I know enough about history to know what happened in Europe in the ’30s when political street brawls were allowed to go ahead,” Dwyer said during the sentencing. “We don’t want that to happen in New York.”

10 Proud Boys members were charged as a result of their response to the coordinated ANTIFA terror attack on the MET last year. Seven ended up taking plea deals while one other individual is still awaiting trial.

“This is pure clown world. The fake news is leading to real sentences,” McInnes explained in his response video to the sentencing.

President Trump showed courage by refusing to throw the Proud Boys under the bus. He should continue to reject the fake news media’s games and call out ANTIFA as the real terror threat.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending