Big League Politics interviewed Simona Papadopoulos about the details of her husband George’s arrest at Dulles International Airport for obstruction of justice and making false statements. As former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos faces charges, let’s review the Department of Justice case against Papadopoulos.
According to the THE DEMOCRATS’ MEMO: CHARGE AND RESPONSE
As stated in the declassified GOP memo on FISA abuse, information about Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos “triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in the late July 2016 by FBI agent Peter Strzok.” Once underway, the investigation was fueled by Christopher Steele’s dossier, which the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used to get a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant on Carter Page.
Here’s what Simona Papadopoulos told us, in addition to other sources and pieces of information that we collected:
- George Papadopoulos, dual citizen of the US and EU, flew in from Germany leaving at 7PM local Munich time to the United States the night before he was arrested. Like all arrests made at the airport by Mueller’s team they all had one thing in common: they all had appointments or interviews set up with Fox News.
- When he was arrested he had been up for more than 24 hrs and put in holding and questioning without a lawyer between 1 am and 8 am until he was brought in front of a judge. Which means that George Papadopoulos was overborne and under duress when speaking with Mueller’s team and trying to recall an alleged conversation that happened in passing over a year ago. and when you are physically and mentally tired from a transatlantic flight being confronted with manufactured evidence you may misspeak and entrapment seems to be the driving force.
- The conversation that “triggered” the Counterintelligence Operation Crossfire Hurricane happened in May 2016 , and the FBI supposedly knew about in July 2016, BUT the FBI didn’t even interview George Papadopoulos until January 27, 2017 which was almost six months after they liberally used FISA court to issue a barrage of warrants on many members of the Trump Campaign. If George Papadopoulos was indeed the reason Crossfire Hurricane was triggered, why was he not mentioned in the Steele dossier or the original FISA warrant applications or the three intelligence reports?
- There are Three Intelligence Community Reports about Russian Election Interference – none of them even mention George Papadopoulos.
- In addition, the fabricated, manufactured DOSSIER which was integral for the FISA warrants issued by Judge Collyer on October 21, 2016 doesn’t mention George Papadopoulos at all.
- Mueller put in his recommendation to the court asking for 0-6 months jail time and a maximum fine allowed under the law they were charging him with which is way different than the criminal complaint he was charged with to which he was arrested for with no warrant. Due process? Does Mueller’s team not have an obligation to follow the RULE OF LAW?
- Why just a fortnight or so away from Papadopoulos sentencing would Mueller file a motion to suppress how they found evidence? Why did George agree to it or did he?
George Papadopoulos is a dual citizen of the US and EU and at 7 pm Munich time he flew out from Munich, Germany to Dulles International. Since George is a dual citizen he would have entered customs with EU ID and at the gate shown his US passport for quick boarding. That doesn’t even get scanned at the second entry point most of the time. Thus, George flying back into the US would have been extremely difficult to track UNLESS a warrant was issued and flagged but we know that an arrest warrant wasn’t even issued when he was arrested.
Mueller’s team appeared to court an hour late. That’s the first red flag as to why the Judge didn’t dismiss everything right then and there or hold Mueller’s team in contempt. Then after arriving late, the Mueller team had the warrant, the recently created criminal complaint and order to seal the case all done at the same time. Again, the warrant for arrest and the criminal complaint didn’t exist before that morning.
This is how the case that morning went down :
The Judge, Judge Buchanan formally advised George that he’d been charged in a criminal complaint. The two charges in the complaint were obstruction of justice and making false official statements. Then George heard Mueller’s team recite the max penalties for each charge as 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine and five years and a $250,000 fine respectively for the aforementioned charges. Oddly enough with all these huge penalties Mueller’s team didn’t want him to be put in prison and an innocent man’s biggest mistake is hoping that without much action the truth will prevail, which is almost never the case especially when a person is a victim of clear entrapment. Mueller’s team requested both his EU and US passport be surrendered and that he not speak to anyone related to the charges against him. The dialogue went as such:
G. Papadopoulos: “Is it possible to know what individuals and entities” shouldn’t be contacted?
Judge Buchanan: “You’ll have to give him a list”
Mueller Counsel: “Yes, your honor”
Judge Buchanan: “All right. He’ll be released. Thank you”
Needless to say the list is very vague and broad.
Here is the audio of the Judge asking the Mueller team why they were late .
“We have restrictions on who we can speak to, so we have difficulty in even finding a lawyer to help us scrap the plea deal George struck under duress” said Simona Papadopoulos.
Mueller and his team along with the Democrats can’t get their stories straight. The Democrats claim that Papadopoulos’ alleged conversation initiated Crossfire Hurricane investigation by Peter Strzok but they didn’t even question Papadopoulos until 2017? So, how did they substantiate their initiation of the investigation and use it as grounds for the illegal FISA warrants without substantiating if the conversation ever took place or at least questioned Papadopoulos?
We have the answer, according to sources and other information.
Ever since their FISA warrants and application for surveillance came under question even by the Judges who signed the FISA warrants themselves, the Mueller team and the FBI have been scurrying to figure out how to substantiate the frivolous claim of “loose suspicion” that was never substantiated. After a trip to London to secure an asset in the presence of Papadopoulos that would go on the record to say such a conversation occurred they found their exit. There was never any mention of Papdopoulos, not even for the FISA warrant for Carter Page in 2016 so that means the Papadopoulos narrative was manufactured retroactively to substantiate their actions. Who filed these fake 302s retroactively? Strzok. Who approved them? Rosenstein.
Even though the statements from FBI Robert Gibbs and Mueller kind of align there are discrepancies. The July 28, 2017, affidavit signed by FBI Agent Robert M. Gibbs, and one from the Oct. 5, 2017, Statement of the Offense issued and signed by Robert Mueller. The affidavit of the FBI agent made it clear that he was questioning Papadopoulos and that it was voluntary but his consent to that would be questionable as he had not slept and could not be in the right frame of mind. As someone who has flown transatlantic numerous times you find yourself drinking the complimentary wine with dinner on the flight like water in hopes of some shut eye. I think this is very important. He was not in capacity to make decisions or talk and of course being awake for 24 hrs, being arrested unexpectedly, jet lagged and maybe a bit off your game because you had one or two mini bottles of wine whatever you say at that point should not even be admissible because he had no attorney and they didn’t tell him he was under arrest. All they told him was he was being questioned.
THE SMOKING GUN
According to the FBI, George chatted with some guy on Facebook at some point in 2016, and that the guy was a Russian. In George’s own words he said “he’s nothing,” referring to the guy. In EURO lingo this means, statements about that topic don’t have credibility. We have to remember George is a global traveler and married to an Italian and he is Greek. Euphemisms amongst Southern Europeans are common speech. Anyone who is culturally Italian, Spanish or Greek can vouch for that raising claim that the statement was taken out of context and not recognized for the value it provided. It reinforced the notion he was probably talking himself up and not taken seriously.
Regardless, Australian diplomat Alexander Downer claims the conversation happened, and Adam Schiff embellished, saying in George’s plea agreement that George made reference to emails, even though Downer never said that. Downer never made such a reference. Downer also stated that he told Australian intelligence about the conversation but Australian Intelligence denies it and Downer also said he told the FBI directly by way of telling the US embassy in London. The narrative fails to align with timelines and how this “information” was received. But again it doesn’t matter because due process was disregarded and all evidence points to retroactive planting by Strzok. I will substantiate this claim further.
The Steele Dossier created around the end of July has almost all the information we find in the affidavit and Mueller’s Statement of Offense as seen here which further substantiates the notion of retroactively manufacturing George Papadopoulos being the reason surveillance on the Trump campaign occurred.
George Papadopoulos isn’t mentioned in any of the Intelligence Reports and Downer never did say anything to Australian intelligence at the time because no record of such a report exists which means any report and or statements were one sided by the Crossfire Hurricane team which didn’t even mention George Papadopoulos until their FISA warrants, methods and Judges approving them came under scope. They didn’t think President Trump would win, and they thought the back up plan to nullify his election prior to his inauguration would have been successful. The whole Papadopoulos story manifested just before January 21, 2017.
On August 13, 2018 a motion to suppress how Mueller’s team gathered evidence was filed here and here. This is what prompted Simona Papadopoulos to seek new counsel and scrap the plea deal and fight this because it seems George’s attorney wasn’t working for him. George, unable to work, travel and or conduct business as normal has thrown a huge wrench into his finances. Mueller knows the financial disadvantage George is facing and is most likely taking advantage of it.
Why would George’s lawyer agree to suppress evidence that Mueller supposedly has against George when George himself never saw the evidence? Discovery was never an option for Papadopoulos, why?
At this point it is important to understand just what a huge injustice has been done under very dubious circumstances. This young man was literally framed as a pawn and since he was innocent never expected to be in the position he is right now and TRUSTED the process which is corrupt and as we’ve seen unfold before our eyes extremely compromised. In essence a complete overhaul, down to administrative assistants is necessary in the Department of Justice and FBI.
There has been a GOFUND ME account set up to help George fight this corrupt system and fund an attorney for him to battle it out that was set up by Simona Papadopoulos just hours after reading and understanding what Mueller had done with his Motion to Suppress. I believe if corrupt, disgraced officials like Comey, McCabe and even Peter Strzok can raise funds an innocent young man used as a prop warrants our assistance. Feel free to donate at :
Bypass Tech Censorship!
Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Former U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher CONFIRMS That He Floated Possible Presidential Pardon to Julian Assange
Trump’s alleged willingness to pardon Assange shows that he is still fighting the deep state.
Yesterday, an attorney for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in court that his client was offered a presidential pardon in exchange for Russia testimony. Former Congressman Dana Rohrabacher has now essentially confirmed those allegations.
“I spoke to Julian Assange and told him if he would provide evidence about who gave WikiLeaks the emails, I would petition the president to give him a pardon,” Rohrabacher said to Yahoo News. “He knew I could get to the president.”
Rohrabacher had a three-hour meeting with Assange in August 2017 while he was holed up at the Ecuadorian Embassy in Britain. Rohrabacher was hoping to gather proof that Seth Rich, a former DNC staffer murdered in 2016 who many now put on the Clinton kill count, or another individual leaked the information to WikiLeaks. The deep state claims the Russians were behind it.
He made it clear that he only requested “truthful” information from Assange, and in no way meant to coerce him to produce a “lie.” Rohrabacher talked to former White House chief of staff John Kelly after the fact about the meeting, whom he said was “courteous” but ultimately brushed him off.
White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham, who worked for the First Lady when this took place, is vehemently denying the allegations.
“The President barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman,” she said in a statement. “He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject. It is a complete fabrication and a total lie. This is probably another never ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.”
Right now, Assange is facing 18 felony charges, including 17 under the Espionage Act, for allegedly helping former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning hack information exposing deep state crimes and other illicit activities in 2010.
“Chelsea Manning’s plea and mitigation to the military commission has key passages which we will be relying on so we would seek to extract that and key press reports so the court has key materials,” said Assange’s attorney Edward Fitzgerald, who is arguing that Britain should not extradite his client back to the United States, during a preliminary court appearance this week.
“What we say is it is an abuse to seek extradition for a political offense so that is really part of the abuse argument,” he added.
Assange has repeatedly said on the record that Russia did not give him the information that his organization leaked from the DNC.
“Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false. We can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange said in Nov. 2016 in an interview with an Australian broadcaster.
“Well, the reason is obvious. They’re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House. They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate President,” Assange told Sean Hannity during a Fox News interview, explaining the genesis of the Russia lie.
“We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party,” Assange told Hannity.
A pardon of Assange would be a devastating blow to the deep state, which has been battling to overthrow President Trump since his election.
Politics2 days ago
VIDEO: Indiana Teacher Claims She Was Fired for Exposing Left-Wing ‘Social Emotional Learning’ Scheme
Campaign 20204 days ago
EXPOSED: Florida GOP Candidate Caught Defending Amnesty for Illegals in Deleted Video
Fake News Media3 days ago
New Lawsuit from Covington Catholic Students Levels Defamation Case Against Hoax Hatemongers
Violent Left4 days ago
Libertarian Party Defends Left-Wing Mob That Attacked Gun Girl Kaitlin Bennett at Ohio University
Big League Guns3 days ago
Parkland Father Demands for Red Flag Laws to be Used on Kaitlin Bennett Following Campus Gang Attack
Culture2 days ago
New York Library Plans LGBT Re-Education Program After Community Rejects ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’
Border Security3 days ago
Due to Trump’s Immigration Crackdown, Immigrants Flock to Canada Instead of the United States
Culture3 days ago
Documents Show Officials Lied to the Public about Giving Background Checks to Library Drag Queens
Campaign 20202 days ago
Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker: “Anti-God”
News2 days ago
Female Prisoner Sues Prison After a Transgender Inmate Allegedly Raped Her
News2 days ago
Former Bernie Sanders Consultant Arrested for Planting Weapons Inside of Jail in Order to Break Inmates out of Prison
News4 days ago
Harvard and Yale are Under Investigation for receiving $375 million in Funding from China and Saudi Arabia