Connect with us

Culture

Hannity Triggers Never-Trumpers Into a Frenzy As He and Kim Dotcom Continue to Discuss Seth Rich

Published

on

Neoconservatives and shills for the Democratic Party were on the attack on Sunday evening, as Kim Dotcom continued to assert that Seth Rich was the source of the Democratic National Committee emails published by WikiLeaks — and Fox News host Sean Hannity urged his followers to hear him out.

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/866464187173752832

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/866469670609670145

Trending: Dr. Anthony Fauci Plotted ‘Global Vaccine Action Plan’ with Bill Gates Before Pushing COVID Panic and Doubts About Hydroxychloroquine Treatments

If Dotcom’s assertions are true, and the leak did in fact come from within, the entire Russian meddling narrative that anti-Donald Trump lawmakers and media personalities have been forcing upon the public will be proven to be false — and simply a cover for the Democratic Party’s own failings.

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

After Dotcom shared a report from Big League Politics detailing his assertions, Hannity quoted the tweet and urged Congress to investigate the murder. The Fox News host noted that if Rich is in fact that leaker, it would prove there was no collusion between Trump and Russia.

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/866454097599356929

Immediately, the ‘Never Trumpers’ went berserk.

Ana Navarro of CNN quoted the tweet and demanded that it was fake news — urging her followers to “condemn the insanity.” The 45-year-old commentator worked doing Hispanic outreach for war hawk John McCain in 2008, one of the biggest peddlers of the Russian conspiracy theories, and voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016.

In 2015, Trump tweeted that Navarro has no talent, and shared a petition for CNN to fire her.

“We demand CNN immediately fire so-called ‘Republican strategist’ Ana Navarro based on the falsification of her credentials, her lack of any particular expertise on political matters and her obvious bias toward Presidential flame-out Jeb Bush as well as her general stupidity. Should Jeff Zucker and CNN ignore this petition, the next step will be civil disobedience at various CNN bureaus and orchestrated verbal confrontation with CNN on-air talent,” the petition stated. “The people will not be denied. Ana Navarro must go!”

Following Navarro’s condemnation of people actually seeking to find out the truth of what happened, a random author named Molly Knight chimed in and went full attack mode on Hannity — culminating in a back-and-forth between the two.

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/866478848657027073

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/866488466883956737

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/866489025762340865

Meanwhile, over on the Reagan Battalion, the account that infamously goes after Trump supporters in all-out attacks which many have labeled “political hit-jobs,” they were calling for their followers to urge Hannity’s sponsors to drop his show.

The account is widely believed to be run by neoconservative deep state types who are connected to failed candidate Evan McMullin and Nathan Lerner.

The account was quickly called out for using the far-left tactics of attacking someone’s livelihood over speech.

https://twitter.com/kenyonbburner/status/866479816949760000

Hundreds of other accounts joined in the attacks, declaring that the theory had been entirely debunked, and shaming those who would dare to question what mainstream media was feeding them.

It remains unclear how the theory can be debunked without a single suspect being taken into custody to explain their motive.

In nearly every case of someone claiming that the theory was nonsense, the person cited the family’s spokesperson Brad Bauman as the source of this so-called “debunking.” What they fail to mention is that Bauman is also a Democratic Party crisis PR manager with a motive to not want these theories to be discussed.

In an aggressive, and strange, statement following new reports that Rich was the source of the leak, Bauman claimed that even if an email to WikiLeaks was found, it would not be evidence of foul play.

“Even if tomorrow, an email was found, it is not a high enough bar of evidence to prove any interactions as emails can be altered and we’ve seen that those interested in pushing conspiracies will stop at nothing to do so,” Bauman said in a statement.

Some how, with today’s journalistic standards, it is expected that you take every statement and claim at face value — as long as it protects Democrats or undermines Trump — even if there are highly visible conflicts of interest.

Dotcom, founder of Megaupload and friend of Julian Assange, has offered to provide Congress with written testimony and proof that murdered staffer was WikiLeaks’ source — if they will include his murder in their Russia investigation. He has stated that he was personally in contact with the murdered staffer.

Hannity also covered the killing on his show last week.

“Now, let me connect the dots from here,” Hannity said. “Now, from my perspective, this could be a very huge bombshell story. If this is true, and Seth Rich gave Wikileaks these DNC emails which ultimately led to the firing, remember, Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the eve of the DNC Convention, this blows the whole Russia collusion narrative out of the water.,” Hannity asserted. “Now, maybe Seth Rich was upset that the DNC was conspiring to hurt Bernie Sanders and help Hillary Clinton when the nomination. We learn from those released emails, remember this, that that was the case.”

Hannity asserted that if this is true, “this could become one of the biggest scandals in American history, and could mean that Rich could have been murdered under very suspicious circumstances.”

Rich was murdered early morning hours of July 10, 2016, near his home while he was on the phone with his girlfriend. The police initially ruled that it was a botched robbery — but his wallet, watch, and necklace were still on his person when he was discovered by police. After his death, his girlfriend told a local news station that she believed that it sounded like he was murdered out of anger.

Assange has previously hinted that Rich may be the leaker, while repeatedly reminding the public that they never comment on their sources. 

“Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often significant risks. There was a 27-year old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back… murdered.. for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington,” Assange said during an interview with Dutch TV last year.

WikiLeaks has retweeted articles claiming that Rich was their source, while refusing to confirm or deny it directly. Assange has stated multiple times that the emails did not come from Russia.

Following Rich’s death, the controversial publisher offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of his killers.

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Bypass Tech Censorship!

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively restricting conservative content through biased algorithms. Silicon Valley doesn't want you to read our articles. Bypass the censorship, sign up for our newsletter now!

Have a hot tip for Big League Politics?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@bigleaguepolitics.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@bigleaguepolitics.com.

Deplorables

Harvard Law School Planning Conference to Smear and Silence Homeschoolers

It seems doubtful the conference will feature parents’ rights advocates.

Published

on

Harvard Law School is planning a conference on the topic of homeschooling, with speakers and content of the tenative June summit suggesting the event will be very negative towards the practice.

The Homeschooling Summit: Problems, Politics, and Prospects for Reform is planned for June 18-19th. The conference listing states that a focus of the conference will be to “discuss child rights in connection with homeschooling in the United States.”

Further investigation of the conference’s premise suggests it’s outright hostile to the notion of homeschooling entirely. One event scheduled for the second day of the conference is entitled “Concerns with Homeschooling.”

take our poll - story continues below

Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump?

  • Are Democrats and the Fake News Media rooting for the Wuhan coronavirus to destroy the economy to remove Trump? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The Home School Legal Defense Association questioned what seemed to be the outright hostility to homeschooling that will be part of the event, pointing out the concerning public statements of some of the educators participating in the summit.

The pro-homeschooling rights group highlighted the anti-homeschooling track records of the event’s speakers.

Some, such as College of William and Mary law professor James Dwyer, have fundamentally questioned the rights of parents to homeschool their children. Dwyer has argued in law review article that “the claim that parents should have child-rearing rights—rather than simply being permitted to perform parental duties and to make certain decisions on a child’s behalf in accordance with the child’s rights—is inconsistent with principles deeply embedded in our law and morality.”

It almost seems anachronistic that the fixings of elite cultural liberalism are maintaining themselves in the midst of the national Chinese coronavirus epidemic, an event that has actually forced the American public and policy makers to focus on things that matter. This anti-homeschooling summit might end up being cancelled because of the coronavirus epidemic. But it any case, Harvard Law’s academic elites seem intent to question the rights of homeschoolers either way.

 

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending