Every presidential election season, we’re treated to a barrage of harebrained schemes for overturning the two-party system that have persisted throughout American history.
“It could totally work!” the masterminds behind such plans always claim, as one ex-Republican operative did this week about her idea for a third-party Democrat-Republican ticket to defeat Donald Trump: former Vice President Joe Biden and incoming Senator Mitt Romney of Utah.
Such schemes are always pure fantasy, though. America has always had a two-party system, and it always will as long as we maintain a winner-take-all electoral process.
Even the most successful third party efforts do nothing but siphon votes from one of the major party candidates. In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt’s “Bull Moose” candidacy helped Woodrow Wilson kick Republican William Howard Taft out of office. Democrat Alabama Governor George Wallace stole the South from Hubert Humphrey and helped ensure Richard Nixon’s win in 1968. And in 1992, billionaire Ross Perot helped elect Bill Clinton by splitting the Reagan coalition that George H.W. Bush needed to win reelection.
That’s the goal here, too, even though proponents won’t come right out and say it. It’s just about undermining President Trump by planting the idea you can oppose him without supporting the Democrats and their liberal agenda.
There’s nothing new about this kind of deluded thinking, of course. Donald Trump has been facing abortive attempts to split his base ever since he announced his run for President. In 2016, for instance, now-defunct Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol promoted a “Never Trump” candidacy by little-known columnist David French, who then passed that torch to the even lesser-known Evan McMullin. Nothing came of either run, but Kristol is still solicitinginterested candidates for a repeat attempt in 2020.
Reportedly, John Kasich — whom Donald Trump destroyed in the 2016 Republican primaries — and Democrat Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper are considering a joint run for president, as well.
There’s a reason these crossover ideas never amount to anything: they’re completely divorced from reality. Republicans don’t want to vote for a Democrat like Joe Biden, and Democrats don’t want to vote for a Republican like Mitt Romney. Combining them doesn’t make for a ticket that everyone likes, but rather one that everyone hates.
Things are different now, though, we are assured, as that ex-Republican operative asserts that Donald Trump running for re-election is a “break-the-glass” emergency that creates “an opening for a radical departure from our malfunctioning two-party political system.”
The theory is that Trump is so uniquely divisive that Americans will abandon both major parties en masse and flock to Biden as though he were some kind of messiah of unification. Yet, while some are able to foresee that a center-right candidate wouldn’t be viable at the top of a hypothetical ticket, based on the assumption that “around 36 percent” of Trump voters wouldn’t abandon him “under any circumstances,” it wasn’t explained how a Biden-Romney ticket would be able to overcome the Democrat Party’s formidable campaign apparatus and steal enough votes away to secure a plurality.
The implication here seems to be that if enough Republicans and GOP-leaning independents give up on President Trump and the America First agenda, Democrats will repudiate the progressive radicalism that is rapidly consolidating power within their party. Not only is that premise contradicted by common sense, the liberals are literally telling us that they will not do that.
So why are we talking about this? Because the ex-Republican operative is now working for Joe Biden, so it’s in her interest to undermine President Trump and help Democrats win the White House in 2020. And if she can get people talking about her new boss’s presidential prospects in the process, so much the better for him.
When swamp dwellers on a Democrat’s payroll start pushing ideas that your gut tells you make no sense, it’s probably because they make no sense. And when they claim that “It could totally work,” you can be certain they already know that it totally couldn’t.
Harlan Hill is a political advisor, media commentator, and an advisory board member of the Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Not all Shi’a-Majority Nations are the Same
The recent alleged arson attack on the Tomb of Esther and Mordechai, a Jewish holy site in Iran, was indicative of the ever-rising rate of anti-Semitism and broader religious intolerance in the Islamic Republic. The recently released United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) annual report had highlighted Iran’s anti-Semitic targeting of its small Jewish population as well as other minorities including followers of the Baha’i faith; the most persecuted faith in Iran.
The USCIRF described that it documented “a particular uptick in the persecution of Baha’is and local government officials who supported them in 2019. Iran’s government blamed Baha’is —without evidence — for widespread popular protests, accusing the community of collaboration with Israel, where the Baha’i World Centre is located. Iran’s government also continued to promote hatred against Baha’is and other religious minorities on traditional and social media channels.”
U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Elan Carr has said that “anti-Semitism isn’t ancillary to the ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is a central foundational component of the ideology of that regime, and we have to be clear about it, and we have to confront it and call it out for what it is.” After the Tomb of Esther and Mordechai was set ablaze last weekend, Carr reiterated these statements and called Iran the “world’s chief state sponsor of anti-Semitism.”
In 2016 I wrote, “According to Articles 12 and 13 of the Iranian Constitution, all branches of Islam and Christianity have the right to worship, as do Jews and Zoroastrians, within the limits of the law there. However, converting away from Islam to any other religion is considered haram, or forbidden, and in many cases, could result in execution.”
Anti-Semitism is a historical reality in Iran’s strict brand of Shi’a Islam, which emphasizes the separation between believers and non-believers, expressed in terms of purity versus impurity. The Jewish People Policy Planning Institute explains that in Iran, “under the influence of Zoroastrian traditions, the Jews were considered physically impure and untouchable (najasa). Jews were also prohibited from inheriting from Shiites, whereas the opposite was allowed. A Jew who converted to Islam was entitled to the entire inheritance. Shiites were not allowed to marry Jewish women, except for in temporary marriage (mut’a), which is an inferior and exploitative type of concubinage.”
It is also a little-known fact that the country name of Iran is derived from the ancient Persian word Arya, a linguistic predecessor of the modern European term Aryan. Further, Armenian Nazi collaborator Garegin Nzhdeh (1886-1955) is the founder of the racist Tseghakronism movement, whose ideology is reminiscent of the Aryan supremacy espoused by Nzhdeh’s Nazi comrades. Today, Nzhdeh’s brand of Aryan and anti-Semitic ideology is palpable in both Armenia and Iran, neighboring countries where the Anti-Defamation League has documented that more than half of the populations hold a series of anti-Semitic views — at even higher rate in Armenia (58 percent) than in Iran (56 percent).
At the same time, it is important to note that the majority of Iranians are secular and the regime does not necessarily represent them, or their values. In fact, the Iranian government persecutes its Azerbaijani, Arab, and other citizens from minority populations.
Yet a stark contrast with Iran is found in its Shi’a-majority neighbor, Azerbaijan, which has strong relations with Israel and protects its Jewish citizens as well as other religious and ethnic minorities.
Southern California-based evangelical pastor Johnnie Moore has elaborated on the telling differences in the realm of religious tolerance between Azerbaijan and Iran, noting that Azerbaijan is “a country where Sunni and Shi’a clerics pray together, where Evangelical and Russian Orthodox Christians serve together, and where thriving Jewish communities enjoy freedom and total security in their almost entirely Islamic country.” He has also called Azerbaijan “a model for peaceful coexistence between religions.”
During my own visit to Azerbaijan, I observed and documented this first-hand. I believe that Azerbaijan is a nation that bears the torch, and burden, of bringing religious freedom to its less tolerant neighbors in the region, like Iran.
Perhaps the most dramatic indicator of Azerbaijani tolerance is the post-Soviet state’s special relationship with its Jewish community and with Israel. Last November, Azerbaijan unveiled a statue in honor of the nation’s Jewish war hero Albert Agarunov (1969-1992). Although Agarunov was killed in battle, his legacy remains a powerful symbol of Jewish integration and pride for his Muslim-majority country.
Israel and Azerbaijan have closely cooperated for more than a decade in the realms of security, energy, and tourism. Most recently, Azerbaijan sent its Finance Minister Samir Sharifov to this year’s American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) policy conference, where Sharifov said that the country’s “cooperation with Israel is not limited to oil supply; we are interested in widening cooperation in defense and the transfer of technology.”
Sharifov also read remarks from a letter to AIPAC by Mehriban Aliyeva, the first vice president of Azerbaijan, who wrote, “It is gratifying that our former compatriots of Jewish origin, living nowadays in the United States and Israel, have maintained close ties with Azerbaijan and contribute to the strengthening of our relations with these countries. We are grateful to them.”
How can Azerbaijan govern and act so differently from its Shi’a neighbor? Iran is a theocracy that mixes religion and state more thoroughly than any other country in the world. In contrast, Azerbaijan’s constitution affirms the country as a secular state and ensures religious freedom for its citizens. Azerbaijan is also facing its own human rights issues and working on progressing as a nation. However, the fact of the matter remains, though Iran and Azerbaijan share a border, the similarities between their governments largely end there. Not all Shi’a-majority nations are the same.
Videos3 days ago
VIDEO: Brawl Breaks Out as Patriots Rise to Confront ANTIFA for Threatening a Disabled Veteran in Colorado Suburbs
Fake News Media3 days ago
Joe Rogan: “I’m Not Buying” Mainstream Media Polls Showing Biden Blowout
Sports3 days ago
Cheater Lance Armstrong’s Store Forbids Sale of Bicycles to Austin Police Department
Big League Guns3 days ago
Four Indicted in “Pay-to-Play” Concealed Carry Bribery Scandal, Including Santa Clara Sheriff’s Captain
News3 days ago
Former NFL Star Calls Out Leftist Radicals for Ruining American Sports
News2 days ago
New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu Vetoes Red Flag Gun Confiscation Order
Around The World3 days ago
Large-Scale Scientific Study Shows That ‘Pupils Pose No Risk of Spreading Covid’ in the Classroom
Culture2 days ago
EXECUTION STYLE: Black Man Charged with Murdering 5-Year-Old White Child in Cold Blood in North Carolina