Connect with us

Big League Wellness

Harvard Study: Patients Who Recover From COVID-19 are Immunized From Reinfection for Four Months

Great news for a very healthy president!



A new Harvard study has indicated that patients who recover from COVID-19 are immunized from reinfection for four months, which means President Donald Trump could resume full campaigning without any public health risk.

The Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) has discovered that serious COVID-19 patients develop a strong immune response to the virus, which they surmise gives them protection from reinfection for four months. The peer reviewed study has been published in the Science Immunology journal.

Richelle Charles, an investigator in the Division of Infectious Diseases at MGH who was a major contributor to the study, noted that their research intended to address the “big knowledge gap in terms of how long…antibody responses last” in recovered COVID-19 patients. They studied blood samples from 343 patients to determine their conclusions.

Trending: VIDEO: Riots Surface in San Bernardino After Armed Suspect Resists Arrest, Retrieves Weapon

They figured out that patients who recover from COVID-19 have an elevated total of the antibody, immunoglobulin G (IgG) in their blood for four months. They also discovered that the blood of recovered patients has the presence of protective neutralizing antibodies that also protect them from reinfection.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“That means that people are very likely protected for that period of time,” said Charles. “We showed that key antibody responses to COVID-19 do persist.”

The researchers claim that the findings will help improve the efficacy of nasal swab tests, which have been notoriously unreliable throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

“There are a lot of infections in the community that we do not pick up through PCR testing during acute infection, and this is especially true in areas where access to testing is limited,” said Jason Harris, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at MGH.

“Knowing how long antibody responses last is essential before we can use antibody testing to track the spread of COVID-19 and identify ‘hot spots’ of the disease,” he added.

Big League Politics has reported on how shoddy testing has led to COVID-19 mass hysteria to take hold across the country:

Scientific experts are raising concerns about the efficacy of COVID-19 tests, claiming that they are too sensitive to the virus and recording an astronomical amount of false positives as a result.

The experts are claiming that people taking the tests are showing up with “positive” results even though there is virtually no way they could ever spread COVID-19 with the negligable amount of the virus in their system. The tests are picking up trace levels of COVID-19 and reporting them as positive tests, which fuels the media-driven hysteria.

The PCR tests that have been most regularly used for COVID-19 screenings gives a yes-or-no response regarding infections. The experts claim that this is woefully inaccurate to make public health considerations.

“We’ve been using one type of data for everything, and that is just plus or minus — that’s all. We’re using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making,” said Dr. Michael Mina, who is an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Dr. Mina is calling for more COVID-19 tests but not under the regime that is currently in place throughout the country right now.

“In fact, we should be ramping up testing of all different people,” he said, “but we have to do it through whole different mechanisms.”

The Trump administration announced last week that they will be purchasing 150 million rapid tests, which experts say is more accurate because they determine how much of the virus is in a particular individual. This information can more accurately determine who needs to be quarantined.

“It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” Dr. Mina said.

Sets of testing data in Massachusetts, Nevada and New York show that up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus. Of course, this news is only being released now that the vast majority of the public has already lost their souls to the chaos and confusion of the scamdemic.

The findings in the Harvard study will stick in the craw of Democrat politicians who want to demonize President Trump and stop him from resuming his campaign following his recovery from COVID-19.

Big League Wellness

Medical ‘Experts’ Claim COVID-19 Vaccine Tests are Safe Despite First Death in Clinical Trial

This vaccine may be deadly.



Big Pharma is doing damage control after a volunteer in a Brazilian COVID-19 vaccine trial died after being stuck with experimental shots.

A Brazilian health authority, Anvisa, has announced that a person had died while participating in AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine study. AstraZeneca’s stock took an immediate downturn as a result of the news. They are trying to downplay the news to protect their immense profits.

A spokesperson from AstraZeneca is claiming that “medical confidentiality and clinical trial regulations” prevents them from commenting on the volunteer’s death in specific terms. They added that ”[a]ll significant medical events are carefully assessed by trial investigators” and ”[t]hese assessments have not led to any concerns about continuation of the ongoing study.”

The academics in the pocket of Big Pharma are rushing to defend the vaccine trials as well. A University of Oxford spokesman claimed “there have been no concerns about safety of the clinical trial” in Brazil, despite the death.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The independent review in addition to the Brazilian regulator have recommended that the trial should continue,” Oxford spokesperson Alexander Buxton said. So, it seems Big Pharma has investigated Big Pharma’s actions and found that Big Pharma did nothing wrong. What a shocker.

Big League Politics has reported extensively about the dangerousness of the frenzied push to develop a COVID-19 vaccine:

The early trials of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are showing horrific side effects, including fever, headaches and sustained exhaustion as Big Pharma rushes to get them approved for the masses.

Pharmaceutical giants Moderna and Pfizer are already injecting these dangerous shots into patients, and many of the people involved are reporting terrible side effects. There are currently at least 41 COVID-19 vaccines that are undergoing human trials right now but only Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson are currently in phase three of their trials. Regardless of the potential damage, these powerful corporations intend to have a vaccine approved for the public by the end of the year.

Tens of thousands of individuals are participating in these trials, with some receiving experimental drugs while others receive placebos. The pharmaceutical giants are underplaying the negative side effects in order to protect their cash cow. They stand to make billions, if not trillions, from the vaccines after the media has primed the masses with hysterical and irresponsible propaganda for months.

“No safety signals have been identified in the study,” Pfizer spokesperson Jerica Pitts said in an email. “As discussed earlier, safety and tolerability of our vaccine candidate are continuously monitored by Pfizer qualified personnel and a DMC, an independent external data monitoring committee, which has access to unblinded data.”

Even though they are suffering during the trials, the brainwashed saps who signed up to participate are still happy to be involved. 44-year-old biologist Luke Hutchison is happy to suffer to increase Big Pharma’s profit margins because he worships the golden calf of science and doesn’t care that his RNA will likely be altered permanently during the trials. Anything to help the technocracy take shape is the credo of the soulless globalist.

“I had a high degree of confidence it would work and I wanted to contribute to the solution,” Hutchison said.

Big Pharma and its lackeys has trillions of reasons to obfuscate the truth about the hazards regarding their experimental and unproven COVID-19 vaccines.

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!