Connect with us

Big League Wellness

Harvard Study: Patients Who Recover From COVID-19 are Immunized From Reinfection for Four Months

Great news for a very healthy president!

Published

on

A new Harvard study has indicated that patients who recover from COVID-19 are immunized from reinfection for four months, which means President Donald Trump could resume full campaigning without any public health risk.

The Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) has discovered that serious COVID-19 patients develop a strong immune response to the virus, which they surmise gives them protection from reinfection for four months. The peer reviewed study has been published in the Science Immunology journal.

Richelle Charles, an investigator in the Division of Infectious Diseases at MGH who was a major contributor to the study, noted that their research intended to address the “big knowledge gap in terms of how long…antibody responses last” in recovered COVID-19 patients. They studied blood samples from 343 patients to determine their conclusions.

Trending: DNI Ratcliffe: China Interfered in 2020 Election, CIA Suppressed Info

They figured out that patients who recover from COVID-19 have an elevated total of the antibody, immunoglobulin G (IgG) in their blood for four months. They also discovered that the blood of recovered patients has the presence of protective neutralizing antibodies that also protect them from reinfection.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“That means that people are very likely protected for that period of time,” said Charles. “We showed that key antibody responses to COVID-19 do persist.”

The researchers claim that the findings will help improve the efficacy of nasal swab tests, which have been notoriously unreliable throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

“There are a lot of infections in the community that we do not pick up through PCR testing during acute infection, and this is especially true in areas where access to testing is limited,” said Jason Harris, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at MGH.

“Knowing how long antibody responses last is essential before we can use antibody testing to track the spread of COVID-19 and identify ‘hot spots’ of the disease,” he added.

Big League Politics has reported on how shoddy testing has led to COVID-19 mass hysteria to take hold across the country:

Scientific experts are raising concerns about the efficacy of COVID-19 tests, claiming that they are too sensitive to the virus and recording an astronomical amount of false positives as a result.

The experts are claiming that people taking the tests are showing up with “positive” results even though there is virtually no way they could ever spread COVID-19 with the negligable amount of the virus in their system. The tests are picking up trace levels of COVID-19 and reporting them as positive tests, which fuels the media-driven hysteria.

The PCR tests that have been most regularly used for COVID-19 screenings gives a yes-or-no response regarding infections. The experts claim that this is woefully inaccurate to make public health considerations.

“We’ve been using one type of data for everything, and that is just plus or minus — that’s all. We’re using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making,” said Dr. Michael Mina, who is an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Dr. Mina is calling for more COVID-19 tests but not under the regime that is currently in place throughout the country right now.

“In fact, we should be ramping up testing of all different people,” he said, “but we have to do it through whole different mechanisms.”

The Trump administration announced last week that they will be purchasing 150 million rapid tests, which experts say is more accurate because they determine how much of the virus is in a particular individual. This information can more accurately determine who needs to be quarantined.

“It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” Dr. Mina said.

Sets of testing data in Massachusetts, Nevada and New York show that up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus. Of course, this news is only being released now that the vast majority of the public has already lost their souls to the chaos and confusion of the scamdemic.

The findings in the Harvard study will stick in the craw of Democrat politicians who want to demonize President Trump and stop him from resuming his campaign following his recovery from COVID-19.

Big League Wellness

As Trump Leaves Office, Media Cites Ineffectiveness of Lockdowns and Democratic Leaders Display Eagerness to Reopen

Right on cue.

Published

on

With President Donald Trump’s impending exit from the White House, many are starting to perceive pivots from Democratic leaders and the mainstream media on the ineffectiveness of lockdowns and the reopening of society.

For example, Newsweek ran an article Thursday titled “COVID Lockdowns May Have No Clear Benefit vs Other Voluntary Measures, International Study Shows.” The study, published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, found through a mathematical model that there was “no clear, significant beneficial effect of [more restrictive measures] on [COVID-19] case growth in any country.”

This is just one study, of course, so it may not reflect objective reality any more than one study which concludes that lockdowns saved “millions of lives.” But after getting bombarded with messages from the media that lockdowns were necessary—with the opposite message found only on explicitly conservative outlets like Big League Politics—it may seem too coincidental to see such a story while the changing of the presidential guard takes place.

Not only that, it also comes at a time when some Democratic leaders appear to be chomping at the bit to reopen restaurants, bars, and schools—after several months of harsh insistence that they all must stay closed in the name of “safety” and “public health.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense?

  • VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters? 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

On Monday, for example, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York called for the reopening of the state’s economy “smartly and safely.”

“We simply cannot stay closed until the vaccine hits critical mass. The cost is too high. We will have nothing left to open. We must reopen the economy, but we must do it smartly and safely,” Cuomo tweeted.

Mayor of Chicago Lori Lightfoot put out a similar call on Thursday, saying that bars and restaurants need to reopen “as quickly as possible” because it will help those businesses survive and reduce the number of large private parties and gatherings.

And incoming president Joe Biden recently pitched a $175 billion plan to return children to school, $130 billion of which would be for public elementary, middle, and high schools, the other $35 billion for colleges and universities. Many teachers unions stubbornly refused to return to in-person classes for the longest time, but now that Biden has come out in support of in-person classes, don’t be surprised to see them suddenly change their tune.

The left is so predictable, isn’t it?

Continue Reading
It's time to name Antifa a terror org! Sign your petition now!


Trending