Pro-abortion advocate Hillary Clinton promoted the killing of pre-born children (again), tweeting out her support for late-term abortions.
“Clinton is correct that abortions after 21 weeks make up only 1.3 percent of abortions annually, according to the most recently available 2014 data from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, however, that still comes to just over 12,000 abortions a year,” according to Life News.
Only about 1% of abortions happen later in pregnancy—almost always because a woman’s health or life is at risk, or the pregnancy is no longer viable.
Lying about this is dangerous, and a slap in the face to families who face heartbreaking situations. https://t.co/732pfPXaxr
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) February 12, 2019
Using a typical left-leaning approach to abortion, Clinton claims that late-term abortions are “almost always” due to a threat to health of the mother. Finishing up her Tweet she said, “lying about this is dangerous, and a slap in the face to families who face heartbreaking situations.”
In an interesting contrast, Guttmacher Institute, the research arm of Planned Parenthood, reported a study in 2013 that “data suggest that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.”
Crooked Hillary is perfectly fine with 12,000 innocent lives being taken in an excruciatingly painful operation. She mentions that President Trump is “lying” about late-term abortions and that is should be “a slap in the face” to those affected by it. However, her words and advocacy for an inaccurate New York Times article create a problem. The only one lying in this situation is Hillary.
There is never a medical necessity to perform abortions in the third trimester. Dr. Omar L. Hamada, an OB/GYN told Fox and Friends, “There’s absolutely no reason to kill a baby before delivery in the third trimester. Not a fetal or maternal indication – what we say in medicine. If there’s a problem, and there are problems in the third trimester, both with the babies and with the mom that require delivery, just deliver the baby. We don’t have to kill it.”
While the New York Times wants to claim that “Trump got it wrong” in reference to his late-term abortion comments at the State of the Union, He actually hit the nail on the head. Hillary agrees with the Times’ claim:
“Late-term abortion is a phrase used by abortion opponents to refer to abortions performed after about 21 weeks of pregnancy. It is not the same as the medical definition obstetricians use for “late-term,” which refers to pregnancies that extend past a woman’s due date, meaning about 41 or 42 weeks. Contrary to Mr. Trump’s claim, late-term abortions do not allow “a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments before birth.”
But, that’s exactly what happens. At any point during an abortion, be it the abortion pill or a D&E abortion used in later pregnancies, a baby is ripped from a mother’s womb. The NYT tries to get technical on terminology used by obstetricians yet fails to recognize that regardless of gestational development, abortion removes a human from their mother’s womb, thus ending their life.
Their matter-of-fact ploy that a fetus can’t “feel pain until at least 24 weeks” is completely inaccurate. The Times uses sources from 2010 and before to back up this claim. However, the most recent science indicates that babies in the womb can respond to touch as early as 8 weeks. Having touch receptors all over their body and the ability to respond to stimuli led Maureen Condic, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Utah to explain to Congress that babies feel pain much earlier than 20 weeks. “The neural circuitry responsible for the most primitive response to pain, the spinal reflex, is in place by 8 weeks of development. This is the earliest point at which the fetus experiences pain in any capacity,” Dr. Condic said.
WATCH: Portland ANTIFA Deploys Incendiary Device Directly Against Portland Police in Nightly Riot
This is terrorism.
An ANTIFA militant threw an incendiary device directly at officers of the Portland Police Bureau during a Breonna Taylor riot in Portland, Oregon on Wednesday night.
The device, which may have been a molotov cocktail, caused a considerable fire right next to a formation of marching officers.
BREAKING: Portland ANTIFA has just deployed an incendiary device against the police. pic.twitter.com/rNReUQgmf3
— Richard (@Wildman_AZ) September 24, 2020
The considerably large fire set by the device is quickly extinguished by an officer carrying a fire extinguisher.
This could’ve easily killed someone. Portland ANTIFA elevated its level of agitation and violence on Wednesday night, largely aware that they can act with impunity without fear of consequences from Portland’s neutered police department, complicit prosecutor, and clueless mayor.
Another view of the attack shows just how dangerous the de facto grenade was to the public and to law enforcement. This was an act of terrorism and attempted murder.
Another angle. That person was clearly aiming the Molotov cocktail at police officers. Attempted murder. pic.twitter.com/SE0mWsZ2Aa
— Richard (@Wildman_AZ) September 24, 2020
The individual who threw the incendiary device was wearing a mask, and runs off on the video footage of the attack. It’s unclear if the Portland Police Bureau arrested them for the criminal act, but he or she could be charged with a range of felony offenses as severe as attempted murder.
The demonstration was declared and riot and dispersed shortly after the attack. It’s likely Portland ANTIFA will continue street havoc in full force this weekend, with the Breonna Taylor grand jury decision(all the way across the country in Kentucky) potentially inspiring the most dangerous street riots in Portland since the organized criminal behavior began more than three months ago.
An Oregon man used a molotov cocktail device in an attempt to start a wildfire in the already devastated state earlier this week. Firefighters have been combating some of the most destructive fires in recent history in Oregon and California, and one man charged with starting them is a longtime left-wing activist with a criminal record of riot violations.
Politics2 days ago
Judge Amy Coney Barrett Recently Approved Democrat COVID-19 Lockdown Policies
Violent Left3 days ago
Bezos-Linked Thinktank Official Calls for Michael Anton’s Execution for Exposing Anti-Trump Color Revolution
Videos3 days ago
SPOOKY: Video Footage Appears to Capture ‘Ghosts’ Running Across Gettysburg Battlefield
Deplorables4 days ago
Nebraska Small Business Owner Commits Suicide After Being Railroaded With Manslaughter For Defending His Bar From Criminal Rioters
Campaign 20203 days ago
WATCH: Joe Biden Struggles to Read Scripted Answers off a Teleprompter During An INTERVIEW
Congress3 days ago
He Found His Spine: Vulnerable Senator Cory Gardner Vows to Support Trump’s SCOTUS Nominee
ANTIFA2 days ago
EXPOSED: BLM Promises to Burn Louisville to the Ground Over Breonna Taylor Case
States2 days ago
Billionaire Mike Bloomberg Pays $16 Million in Fines of Black and Hispanic Felons to Enable Them to Vote